Cancer, various tissues

Gauging Breast Cancer Risk

Home
Chemo, a bad choice for 90% of cancers, BMJ article
Thyroid cancer, another overdiagnosed as cancer
Over use of diagnostic radiation--24,000 deaths
HRT following breast cancer has positive outcomes
Phosphorous, Biomarker for late-stage cancer
Biomarker that allows a cancer to evade the immune system
Cancer, Classification of cell types
Lung cancer types and treatments
OBESITY increases cancer risk
Prostate cancer overview
PSA screening not recommended
Prostate conditions and examination
ELEVEN THINGS TO KNOW ABOUT PROSTATE CANCER
Hyperplasias and breast cancer risk
Gauging Breast Cancer Risk
Cervical Cancer

Articles on inherited genetic contribution to the risk for breast cancer (under 10%) at  http://healthfully.org/highinterestmedical/id29.html, cervical cancer (1/250 risk) at http://healthfully.org/highinterestmedical/id15.html, oral contraception and HRT and risk for breast cancer at http://healthfully.org/highinterestmedical/id7.html and http://healthfully.org/highinterestmedical/id25.html 

 

A New Way to Gauge Your Risk of Getting Breast Cancer

 

 

Abnormal breast cells found in biopsy is linked to an 8-fold risk increase

 

Matthew Schulman, 7/6/7

A new study presents what may be a more accurate model for predicting breast cancer in women diagnosed with a condition that often presages that malignancy. The finding is good news for doctors seeking to develop risk-reduction strategies for the condition, called atypical hyperplasia

Hyperplasias are benign, microscopic clusters of cells usually found through sampling of breast tissue. If the growth is abnormal, the resulting atypical hyperplasia can increase a woman's risk of breast cancer. Researchers at the Mayo Clinic studied 331 women diagnosed with atypia for an average of about 14 years, noting the number of foci, or spots, of the aberrant cell growths in each participant and how many women actually developed breast cancer. They found that the risk of developing the cancer varied depending on the number of foci of atypia. One focus more than doubled the risk for women compared with the general population, while the risk increased five-fold with the presence of two foci, and nearly eight-fold for three or more.

The study, published in the July 1, 07, edition of the Journal of Oncology, calls into question how the system called the Gail model, which is widely used to assess breast cancer risk prediction, should be applied to women with atypia. The Gail model weighs family history of breast cancer in calculating lifetime risk for the disease. The Mayo study found that, for women with atypical hyperplasia, the cancer risk was independent of family history. That inconsistency suggests the Gail model overestimates risk for women who have both atypia and a family history of breast cancer.

This new understanding of risk prediction may also stretch out the time frame during which women need to be concerned. "Previous studies indicated that there was an increased risk for breast cancer for only 10 years after a biopsy showed the presence of atypia," says Amy Degnim, the study's lead author and an assistant professor of surgery at the Mayo Clinic. "That's not what we found. The increased risk persisted up to 25 years." The researchers also found that women diagnosed with atypia before the age of 45 had a higher risk of developing breast cancer than those diagnosed after age 55.

While the findings can't yet be translated into clinical practice, Degnim is confident that assessing breast cancer risk from the number of atypia foci will offer women more accurate risk estimates and eventually improve their care. Armed with a more reliable measurement of the risk facing each patient, doctors will be better able to "advise patients on preventive strategies, including close surveillance with mammography, hormonal treatments with tamoxifen or raloxifene, and lifestyle changes like limiting alcohol intake and maintaining healthy body weight," according to Ted Gansler, a pathologist and director of clinical content for the American Cancer Society.

 

Enter supporting content here

INTERNAL SITE SEARCH ENGINE by Google

Disclaimer:  The information, facts, and opinions provided here is not a substitute for professional advice.  It only indicates what JK believes, does, or would do.  Always consult your primary care physician for medical advice, diagnosis, and treatment. 

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^