Psychiatric Drugs

Home | Drugging senior very common | SSRI cause neuron damage | The Bipolar Bamboozle | Psychiatric drugs 32% bias reporting in journal articles | Ritalin and other ADHA drugs fail | Risperdal and other dimentia drugs fail | Increased mortality with dimentia drugs | Prozac fails | Psychiatric drugs increase mortality rate by 350% | Half million die early in EU and US from psychiatric drugs | John Nash and neuroleptic drugs are making us crazy

Ritalin and other ADHA drugs fail


Another example of harm done.  In this case compromise the quality of life of children for to make them better cope with inadequate home and school environments.  Few children look forward to taking a drug that makes them doppy.  Moreove, the results of the NICE review are understated because they didn’t look at the raw data, but instead looked at journal articles which on an average have a 32% positive bias. 


Study: ADHD drugs don't work


FiercePharma November 12, 2007

A new study may throw a big wet blanket over the market for ADHD drugs. According to the BBC, which obtained data from an unfinished, long-term study, meds aren't an effective way to treat attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. After three years of drug treatment, patients did no better than those who simply got talk therapy. And the drugs may have stunted some children's growth.

Ironically, this study is the very same one that started the ADHD drug craze back in 1999. The Multimodal Treatment Study of Children with ADHD concluded after a year of data-gathering that the drugs worked better than behavioral therapy. But now that the research has been ongoing for years, the original study's co-author says, "I think that we exaggerated the beneficial impact of medication...There's no indication that medication's better in the long run."

The research will be broadcast on the BBC tonight. Its release comes at a time when Britain's National Institute for Clinical Excellence--the panel that decides which meds the National Health Service will pay for--is reviewing treatment guidelines for ADHD. NICE is expected to make new recommendations next year. Meanwhile, the FDA and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality just launched a study of data on 500,000 children to see whether meds used to treat ADHD increase risk of heart attack, stroke, or other cardiovascular problems.

It is a gross dereliction of duty (failure to protect the public) when in this computer age it takes 4 decades for the FDA and NICE for to looking to issues of side effects of Ritalin--jk. 

BBC world News America, 12 November 2007

Drugs for ADHD 'not the answer'

Treating children who have Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) with drugs is not effective in the long-term, research has shown.

A study obtained by the BBC's Panorama programme says drugs such as Ritalin and Concerta work no better than therapy after three years of treatment. The findings by an influential US study also suggested long-term use of the drugs could stunt children's growth. It said that the benefits of drugs had previously been exaggerated. The Multimodal Treatment Study of Children with ADHD has been monitoring the treatment of 600 children across the US since the 1990s.

'Exaggerated impact'

Most of the estimated 500,000 children in Britain with ADHD receive no treatment at all.  But of those that do, most - about 55,000 last year - are prescribed stimulants like Ritalin and Concerta.  The cost of these drugs to the NHS is about 28m.

In 1999, the American study concluded that after one year medication worked better than behavioural therapy for ADHD. This finding influenced medical practice on both sides of the Atlantic, and prescription rates in the UK have since tripled. But now after longer-term analysis, the report's co-author, Professor William Pelham of the University of Buffalo, said: "I think that we exaggerated the beneficial impact of medication in the first study.   "We had thought that children medicated longer would have better outcomes. That didn't happen to be the case.  "There's no indication that medication's better than nothing in the long run."

Prof Pelham said there were "no beneficial effects" of medication and the impact was seemingly negative instead. "The children had a substantial decrease in their rate of growth so they weren't growing as much as other kids both in terms of their height and in terms of their weight," he said.

Aggressive behaviour

The Panorama programme features disturbing footage of a 14-year-old from Stoke-on-Trent, who has been on ADHD medication for a decade. Craig Buxton's family kept a video diary of his behaviour and captured on camera examples of just how explosive his behaviour can be.  He has self-harmed, suffers night terrors and is aggressive - he recently assaulted three school teachers. His mother Sharon said things had gone from bad to worse. "He has broke down and cried when he gets into situations," she said.  "He says: 'Why am I like this mum, I don't want to feel like this, I don't want to be like this, you know, help me'. "And all I can do is go back to the doctors and say: 'Is there anything more you can do?'  "All they say is, well, we are doing what we can."

The National Institute for Clinical Excellence is currently revising the treatment guidelines for ADHD.  Chair of the working group Dr Tim Kendall said they were devising a strategy which was likely to involve training for parents as well as "behavioural interventions".

"The important thing is that we have an approach which doesn't focus just on one type of treatment," Dr Kendall said.