Home | KEEPING YOUR BELOVED CENTERED ON YOU--jk | LIFE-LONG LOVERS: how to--JK | WHY WOMEN LIVE LONGER | HRT concise summary--jk | HORMONE REPLACEMENT THERAPY REVIEWED--WOMEN--JK | HRT is safe--Scientific American | Genes, estrogen receptors, and breast cancer | ONE TYPE OF ESTROGEN LOWERS THROMBOSIS RISK | POST MENOPAUSE SEX STATS | Tamoxifen side effects--avoid | PM WOMEN ON ESTROGEN LOOK YOUNGER | ESTROGEN SUPPLEMENT REDUCES HEART DISEASE | ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES NOT ASSOICATED WITH BREAST CANCER | HRT-- MORE STUDIES SUPPORT IT | HRT, SEVERAL STUDIES, ABSTRACTS | Mechanism of how estrogen accelerates cancer | Acupuncture versus Estrogen for Hot Flashes | BRAIN AS CLOCK FOR MENOPAUSE--Scientific American article | ESTROGEN PREVENTS ARTHRITIS | Osteoporosis Screen: What you need to know | Femur Fractures Bisphosphonate Treatment | Runners 40% greater bone density | Ovarian Cysts, an overview | TESTOSTERONE FOR WOMEN? | 55% Breast Implants leak--FDA study finds | Genetic risk for breast cancer | CERVICAL CANCER RISK FACTOR | Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome | Pap Smear, Once every 5 years recommended | Breast Cancer Tests Frequently Wrong | FDA's ARTICLE ON MENOPAUSE | ASPIRIN REDUCES C-SECTION 400%--meta-study reveals--another shows reduces breast cancer | downers during pregnancy harm baby | Women Health Links
Acupuncture versus Estrogen for Hot Flashes

Acupuncture for menopausal hot flushes

Bandolier (Evidence based thinking about health)


At http://www.jr2.ox.ac.uk/bandolier/band132/b132-7.html

Evidence-based thinking occasionally means having to rub a few neurones together to make sense of something one reads. A perfectly good randomised trial of acupuncture, sham acupuncture, and oestradiol in menopausal women with hot flushes [1] is a useful test. It concluded that acupuncture and sham acupuncture work, but less well than oestradiol [form of estrogen], and that acupuncture is a viable alternative, but not sham acupuncture. Is that a sensible conclusion based on the evidence?



The report [1] presents data on three arms (acupuncture, sham acupuncture, oestradiol) of a five-arm study. There were 43 women in the three arms reported, who underwent two weeks of baseline data collection, and then 12 weeks of treatment, with later follow up which can be ignored, mainly because patient withdrawal reduces its value.

Acupuncture or sham acupuncture was given twice a week for two weeks, followed by once a week for 10 weeks. Sham acupuncture involved superficial needle insertion in the skin, one to five centimetres away from acupuncture points. Acupuncture involved electrostimulation and deeper insertion at true acupuncture points.


The number of hot flushes over 12 weeks of treatment in the three groups is shown in Figure 1. There was no difference between acupuncture and sham acupuncture over 12 weeks, but oestrogen reduced flushes to below one per day on average.


Figure 1: Average daily flushes in postmenopausal women treated with acupuncture, sham acupuncture, or oestrogen



The obvious conclusion is that acupuncture doesn't work. Another conclusion, that drawn in the paper, is that this proves that acupuncture works by reducing daily flushes by half. We are treated to a long discussion that ambles through endorphins, effects of needles, is nothing if not comprehensive, as is the huge weight of statistical analysis used. But the headline conclusion found in the abstract (all that most will read) is that “acupuncture is a viable alternative treatment”.

This is the problem we often find, that the "non-active, active" control works as well as the active. Here, though, we can shine a little more light on this problem. Table 1 shows the start and end of trial daily flush rate in this randomised trial, and the results for oestrogen and placebo found in a Cochrane review of the effect of oestrogens [2].


Table 1: Average daily flushes in postmenopausal women at the start and end of treatment, in the randomised trial and in a Cochrane review




Sham acupuncture

(Sys Rev)


(Sys Rev)

Start of treatment






End of treatment







It shows that the effects of oestrogen in the trial and review are about the same. It also shows that the effects of acupuncture or sham acupuncture are about the same as placebo. In other words, acupuncture is about as good as doing nothing, but it is much, much, more expensive.

When will alternative therapies really prove they work? While we wait will they stop fleecing people of huge amounts of cash for doing nothing?


  1. Y Wyon et al. A comparison of acupuncture and oral estradiol treatment of vasomotor symptoms in postmenopausal women. Climacteric 2004 7: 153-164.
  2. AH MacLennan et al. Oral oestrogen and combined oestrogen/progestogen therapy versus placebo for hot flushes. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004, Issue 4.

On Publisher:

The first issue of Bandolier, an independent journal about evidence-based healthcare, written by Oxford scientists, (RAM AND HJM) was printed in February 1994. It has appeared monthly ever since and has become the premier source of evidence based healthcare information in the UK and worldwide for both healthcare professionals and consumers.



Enter supporting content here