Methods A
population-based prospective cohort study was performed of 1423 middle-aged
Finnish men initially without cardiovascular disease, cancer, or diabetes. The
main outcome measure was death from cardiovascular disease and any cause.
Results The
mean follow-up was 11.9 years. There were 157
deaths during follow-up, of which 55 were cardiovascular. In age-adjusted
analyses, serum uric acid levels in the upper third were associated with a
greater than 2.5-fold higher risk of death from cardiovascular disease than
levels in the lower third. Taking into account cardiovascular risk factors and
variables commonly associated with gout increased the relative risk to 3.73.
Further adjustment for factors related to the metabolic syndrome strengthened
the risk to 4.77. Excluding the 53 men using diuretics did not alter the
results. In age-adjusted analyses, men with serum uric acid levels in the upper
third were 1.7-fold more likely to die of any cause than men with levels in the
lower third. Adjustment for further risk factors strengthened the association
somewhat.
Conclusions Serum
uric acid levels are a strong predictor of
cardiovascular disease mortality in healthy middle-aged men, independent of
variables commonly associated with gout or the metabolic syndrome. Serum uric
acid measurement is an easily available and inexpensive risk marker, but
whether its relationship to cardiovascular events is circumstantial or causal
remains to be answered.
The role of uric acid as an independent marker of cardiovascular
risk has been controversial for decades. At physiologic pH values, serum
monoanionic uric acid is the major product of purine metabolism in humans and
higher primates and is formed from xanthine, a reaction catalyzed by xanthine
dehydrogenase/oxidase.1,2 Several
epidemiologic studies have shown elevated uric acid levels to predict increased
risk of cardiovascular events,3- 12although lack
of an independent relationship has also been found.3,10
It is conceivable that the interpretation of the
"independent" role of uric acid is further complicated by the use of
diuretics and by the very close correlation of uric acid levels with
established cardiovascular risk factors such as hypertension,13,14 obesity,
low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, hypertriglyceridemia,
hyperinsulinemia, and reduced insulin sensitivity,15- 19 all of
which are components of the metabolic or insulin resistance syndrome.20 Moreover,
there are other features of atherosclerosis, such as inflammation,21oxidative
stress,22 and
endothelial dysfunction,23 that have
also been associated with increased serum uric acid levels. Furthermore,
clinical ischemic heart,24 cerebrovascular,25and even mild
renal26 disease
are all associated with increased uric acid levels.
Recently, the massive 16.4-year follow-up of the National Health
and Nutrition Examination Survey I (NHANES I),11 consisting
of 5926 subjects, has convincingly established the role of serum uric acid as
an independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality in subjects older than 45
years regardless of sex, menopausal status, diuretic use, presence of
cardiovascular disease (CVD), or race. However, NHANES I did not adjust for the
essential components of the metabolic syndrome, like waist circumference and
levels of glucose, insulin, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and
triglycerides. Furthermore, the baseline serum creatinine level was unknown in
60% of the participants.
As determination of serum uric acid is widely available and
inexpensive, a better understanding of its role as a risk factor is certainly
warranted. Therefore, we studied the predictive role of uric acid levels in a
population-based sample of 1423 healthy (free of CVD, diabetes, or cancer)
middle-aged men with respect to 12-year cardiovascular and total mortality.
Results
The unadjusted Kaplan-Meier hazard curves for serum uric acid
levels categorized into thirds (tertile limits, 5.04 and 5.88 mg/dL [299.78 and
349.74 µmol/L])… In age-adjusted Cox proportional hazards analyses, serum uric
acid levels in the 2 upper thirds were associated with 2.7-fold higher risk of
death from CVD than uric acid levels in the lower third. Further adjustment
for factors related to the
metabolic syndrome (dyslipidemia, insulin and glucose levels, leisure-time
physical activity, and cardiorespiratory fitness) additionally strengthened the
risk (relative risk for the upper third vs lower third, 4.77). ddition of
white blood cell count and serum fibrinogen concentrations to the models as
measures of inflammation did not weaken the association (data not shown).
Excluding the 53 men who were using diuretics at baseline had little effect on
the results. Men with uric acid concentrations in the upper third were also
more likely to die of coronary heart disease, but the association only tended
to significance (32 deaths; relative risk, 3.12 [95% confidence interval,
0.92-10.6]; model 2). Likewise, men in the upper third had an increased risk of
death from stroke (52 deaths; relative risk, 5.52 [95% confidence interval,
1.09-28.0]; model 2). Excluding the 53
men who used diuretics had little effect on the results. [Another example of
pharma attacking an off
patent drug as dangerous.] ….; The relationship between uric acid and
cardiovascular risk may therefore not be wholly linear, but whether this is so
and at what point the curve steepens has yet to be established. [Intermediate
range was at higher risk than the top 5th or top 3rd.]
Comments
Elevated levels of serum uric acid may be due to increased
dietary intake of purines, increase in uric acid production, or decrease in its
excretion. Differences in alcohol consumption, exercise, or dietary purine
intake may have caused transient hyperuricemia.42 Adjustment
for alcohol consumption, leisure-time physical activity, or cardiorespiratory
fitness did not attenuate the association of hyperuricemia with cardiovascular
mortality. Dietary purines are also unlikely to explain the association.
[As of 2004] the mechanisms by which hyperuricemia is associated
with atherosclerotic vascular disease remain to be clarified. It is not even
established whether hyperuricemia is a risk factor on its own, requiring
treatment, or an innocent bystander in proximity to vascular accidents, merely
reflecting an adverse risk factor pattern; or ev en whether, as a major
endogenous antioxidant, it could play a protective role in this respect.
With regard to the first possibility, there are no convincing
data to show that treatment of hyperuricemia reduces cardiovascular events.
Second, many associations of hyperuricemia have been reported, but during the
past decade hyperuricemia has also been linked to reduced insulin sensitivity.16- 19