Aspirin: In the 1950s,
when I was growing
up, aspirin was the dominant over-the-counter drug for mild pain, arthritis, anti-inflammatory,
and colds. It came in 500 mgs,
and the initial dose was 2, followed by 1 every 3 hours, or as needed. The standard
daily usage for arthritic and
joint pain, and chronic lower back pain was 2.5 grams per day, with 7.5
grams as the upper limit—this continued to be recommended by doctors until the
1990s. Annual production reached a peak
in the U.S. of 20,000 tons in 1958. Nothing
has changes since the 1960s as to its risk factors, and several major benefits
were since discovered including those of prevention of blood
clots, heart attacks, cancer, atherosclerosis, Alzheimer’s, and increased
cancer survival, yet its sales have decline until now it is 8th--mostly
from the ineffective under 100 mg dose for those at risk of a heart attack. Aspirin
is an NSAID, the only safe one. The American Heart Association warns that all
NSAIDs[1]
increase significantly the risk of heart attack but for aspirin. Being 8th is proof that pharma
controls drug usage. Among its
significant benefits are prevention of hardening of the arteries,
cancer, Alzheimer’s disease, and thrombosis which causes heart attacks, strokes,
pulmonary embolism, and kidney damage. Aspirin
reduces significantly the top three killers.
Because of its anti-inflammatory action, “It is the standard against
which all rheumatoid arthritis medication should be measured” Goodman &
Gilman 11th Ed, 2006. Aspirin
is the drug of choice for osteoarthritis, Merck Manuel 15th Ed. p 973. Aspirin’s anti-inflammatory action prevents
hardening of the arteries, which is essentially an inflammatory process that oxidizes LDL. Aspirin also promotes the death of abnormal
cells by stimulating the body’s mechanism for destruction of abnormal cells
(necrosis factor) including trauma damaged cells and precancerous and cancerous
cells. By doing so it both prevents most
cancers and promotes survival For
example, with breast cancer the rate is reduced over 40% and survival of stages
I, II & III increased over 60% (doesn’t affect metastatic cancers). Yet
the FDA gives it the lowest approval
rating for cancer treatment. Pharma
attacks the usage aspirin because it would drastically reduce the sales of nearly
half their blockbusters. Besides
ignoring aspirin’s benefits, pharma has blown out of proportion its health
risks. Doctors automatically blame
all major &
minor bleeding episodes on aspirin, though scientific studies shown an increased
risk of ulcer to 4% over 5 years. This occurs because of pylori bacteria in their
stomachs. Goodman and Gilman supra,
comment that “many clinicians favor the use of other NSAIDs perceived to have
better gastrointestinal tolerability, even though this perception remains
unproven by convincing clinical trial”.
And to prevent the next generation from taking aspirin, pharma and the
FDA warn about Reyes Syndrome. Once
diagnosed based on symptom with 555 cases in 1980, with the advent of genetic
testing for the metabolic syndrome it dropped to two cases in 1994. This
drop in frequency is ignored by pharma and the FDA. Finally on dosage: pharma reduced aspirin from 500 to 325 mg, and
initial dose from 1 gram to 325 mg, which is too low to be effective for pain
and inflammation. Effective dose
for pain and arthritis is 2.5
gm daily. For prevention of blood clot (thrombosis)
cancer, atherosclerosis, and Alzheimer’s disease 325 mg once or twice
daily, and twice that amount as
chemotherapy for cancer. For over 50
years 2.5 grams or more taken by millions for arthritis--the 1987 Merck Manual
recommends 3.5 grams daily. The increased
ulcer risk was known for over a century, but it took pharma’s unwarranted assault
to change doctor’s opinion. Moreover the
other NSAIDs increase the risk of ischemic heart attacks and strokes, and acetaminophen
(Tylenol) causes asthma and liver failure. Tens of millions have died early
from cancer, ischemic
heart attacks & strokes, and Alzheimer’s disease because the marketplace
has no conscience.
Q10
(CoQ10): recognized
as the most effective antioxidant. A
number of major health conditions are caused
by oxidative damage including hardening of the arteries for which Q10 is
protective. Q10
is found in every cell in the body because it is used by the mitochondria in
the production of ATP from glucose. ATP
accounts for 95% of the body’s energy. The antioxidant
nature of Q10 derives from its energy carrier function in the production of ATP. As an energy carrier, the Q10
molecule is continually going through an oxidation-reduction cycle. It is the best of anti-oxidants because it is
distributed throughout the body. It is
found in LDL (bad cholesterol) and thus protects by preventing oxidative damage
to LDL which is the initial step in
the process that results in hardening of the arteries (cardiovascular disease, CVD).
High blood pressure is a result of clogged, stiff arteries. CVD
causes over 80% of heart attacks and strokes. It protects other tissues from
oxidative
damage and thereby reduces the risk for a number of serious conditions
including Alzheimer’s & Parkinson’s diseases, CVD, and macular
degeneration.
The second important function is protection of the mitochondria from damage
from the reactive chemicals produced in the metabolism of glucose. Long
term usage of Q10 through protection
of the mitochondria a greater production of ATP, thus greater endurance and
improved health for the elderly. It is
particular beneficial for those with heart disease, hypertensions, diabetics;
and for those taking statins or beta blocker (for hypertension), for these
drugs partially block the bodily production of Q10 (40% for statins) and the other
products of the mevalonate pathway. All
these benefits from long-term Q10 add up to an increase in lifespan and greater
endurance. Q10 is not toxic: a
study found that daily dose of 3600 mg was
well tolerated by both the healthy and unhealthy patients. Recommendation: 100 mg for children, being gradually
increased to 300 mg by the age of 40--and its yearly cost through Costco is
under $70 for Kirkland brand Q10.
Natural
Estrogen (Estradiol) with progesterone HRT: What
every woman should be taking because of
the numerous, major health benefits, benefits that would slash pharma’s profits.
As Dr. Ben Goldacre says, “the devil hides in
the details.” Of the 4 natural estrogens,
only estradiol (E2, 17β-estradiol) has major
benefits. Two (estriol (E3) and estetrol
(E4)) are found in pregnant women. They should not
be used in HRT because they
block estradiol’s action. Big pharma
being against hormone replacement therapy (HRT) markets ineffective products at
too low a dose, and Prempro, the most popular HRT. Based on marketing science,
including a major
clinical trial by the FDA which used Prempro, a combination of estrogen derived
from pregnant mare’s urine and the progestin MPA. The biological effects
of mare’s estrogens
are different than human estrogen and MPA blocks the some of the positive
effects of estrogen. The result contradicted other trials because of the use of
Prempro. The finding for Prempro[2]
cannot be validly applied to the
natural estradiol and progesterone—though pharma and the FDA did. The
FDA warns that HRT (hormone replacement
therapy) has only one valid medical use, to manage hot flashes, and it should
be used at the lowest dose for the shortest time. Earlier trials and epidemiological
studies
found that HRT lowers Alzheimer’s 83%, heart
attacks 32%, cronary heart disease 50%, colorectal
cancer 46%, breast cancer 73%, thrombosis 8%, osteoporosis fractures 90%, macular
degeneration 65%, reduces & prevents arthritic join destruction, firmer
breasts, healthier skin (less wrinkles, thicker, 48% more
collagen), reduces hair loss, improved cognitive function, less
depression and mental illness, and a general feeling of well-being with increased
libido. Estradiol is the only
effective treatment to prevent osteoporosis, and its methods of cardiovascular
protection are well documented. The
lack of estradiol is the reason for the
precipitous decline in health of women. Life extension with long-term natural
HRT
should be at least 4 years—though clinical trials do not address this. Because
of an increase in a low incident cancer (uterus) a
progestin (synthetic orally active hormone with some progesterone properties) is
added to hormone replacement therapy rather than the natural progesterone which
isn’t orally active—except when micronized and suspended in oil. Thus
like testosterone which isn’t orally
active, the best method of application is a lotion obtained from a compounding
pharmacy in a dose of 4 mgs estradiol plus 100 mg of progesterone per
application--absorption
rate is about 15% . Apply widely
as possible over the torso, back, shoulders, underarms, and face using
water and rubbing it in to promote better absorption. Recently
progesterone has been micronized in oil and available as a pill. Ideal free-serum estradiol level
is 7-9 pg/mL. A
compounding pharmacy can prepare a pill consisting of 2 mg of estradiol with 50
mg of progesterone. The lotion form is better
for the skin. Plant sources of estrogen
are not very effective. Doctors who
follow the Wiley Protocol are other methods of hormone balancing for post-menopausal
women are milking the insurance and patient, it lacks sound scientific
evidence. Keep it simple.
Testosterone: the male
hormone that is almost identical in structure to estrogen and thus has many of
the same benefits as estrogen. Noticeable benefits for testosterone: quality
of life in 4 weeks, depressed mood in 30 weeks, bone mass in 26 weeks, lipid
profile in 52, inflammation in 12 weeks,
sexual interest in 6 weeks, erection/ejaculation in 26 weeks, red cells in
52 weeks, insulin sensitivity in 52 weeks , muscle strength in 16 weeks,
fat mass in 16 weeks (Eur J
Endocrinol. 2011, Nov. 675-85). Other
benefits include improved cognitive
function, reduced risk for Alzheimer’s disease, metabolic syndrome, diabetes,
cardiovascular disease and the resultant heart attacks and strokes. The negative
claims made against testosterone
are more of pharma’s marketing science.
It is not associated with higher cholesterol levels or prostate cancer,
but rather the reverse. “Testosterone does
not cause or produce deleterious effects on prostate cancer” Wiki. Recommended: once serum cholesterol level drops
below 350, to use 100 mg of testosterone in a topical cream. Ideal level
in the 850 to 1200 ng/dL or
higher. Increased to 150 mg at age 75
as effects diminish--bio-receptors and response decreases with age as does the
level of free (available) testosterone. Current assay methods are inaccurate
as to measurement of free testosterone. Best
source for testosterone is from a compounding pharmacy. Apply widely
as possible over the torso, back, shoulders, underarms, and face using
water and rubbing it in to promote better absorption. Doctors who follow
a program of hormone balance are milking the insurance and patient. There is
probably a value to taking also HGH,
though how much lacks quality evidence.
The fifth healthful choice,
recommended only for those with Cardiovascular disease (CDV) or cholesterol
above 280
The Niacin section of this article has been deleted because cholesterol is not a
causal factor for coronary artery disease. A series of articles are to be found on the cholesterol myth and related
topic at Recommended long /rl Recommended
healthful diet Recommended concise. The evidence presented in these articles confirm the claims below made on bad pharma.
Bad Pharma: Any
discussion of what people take for health must be prefaced by an assessment of
the ploys of the major pharmaceutical corporations, hereafter called (big) pharma.
On point are three statements. Harvard
Professor Marcia
Angell MD, states “We
certainly are in a health care crisis ... If we had set out to design the worst
system that we could imagine, we couldn't have imagined one as bad as we have.”
Dr. Philippe
Even
describes
it” “The pharmaceutical industry is the
most lucrative, the most cynical and the least ethical of all the
industries. It is like an octopus with
tentacles that has infiltrated all the decision-making bodies: world health
organizations, government
agencies, parliaments, high administrations in health and hospitals and the
medical profession." Dr. Des Spence
a British Medical Journal columnist describes this process “Conduct
questionable research and control the original data[3],
then schmooze health regulators and patient groups to established more
inclusive drug-treatment protocols that is supported by the questionable
science.” The 800 pound gorilla
(a phrase used by Dr. Marcia Angell) gives
the continuing education class required for doctors, who then repeat to
patients what they have learnt from the gorilla’s
thought leaders[4] &
sales reps, and often officially approved in schmoozed treatment guidelines. In
our corporatist state, the FDA is a friend
of pharma; and our corporate media won’t offend its major source of
income. The same forces which caused the
tobacco companies to glamorize cigarettes in the 1920s fully aware of its health consequences,
to aggressively market them, and to produce junk science to deny their harm;
these forces operate upon all corporations, including pharma. Pharma is very
good at persuading doctors and
the public that their new drugs are developed based on the latest sophisticated
advancements in medical science, and thus that they are much better than older
drugs. While there are some, the vast
majority of new drugs are short term barely better than nothing at all (a
placebo) in phase III testing for the FDA.
They are not compared to older drugs.
They then are hyped based upon subsequent junk science phase IV studies generated
by pharma’s marketing departments. This
“information” is fed in required continuing education classes to doctors by well
paid thought leaders. Their control of
research which produces junk science and their influence upon treatment
guidelines has turned upside down the decision process and forced doctors to rely
upon thought leaders rather; a process that Prof. Ben Goldacre, MD calls, “expert
based medicine”. Every move made by
pharma is designed to increase profits, which is the fiduciary duty of
pharma. Knowing what has happened to
medical science: an incredible amount of
harm has resulted, and this website is dedicated to exposing it.
Take a
deep breath and absorb the dismal state of medicine; and if inclined to read
more, start with Marketing
Science. What
follows is the summation of several
thousand hours of analysis of journal articles and medical textbooks on over 30
health/treatment topics. This
information has been used in the development of the http://healthfully.org website—started in 2004. The results are at variance to the gorilla’s marketing
science.
The purpose is both to advise and educate: advice on what works, doesn’t work, and to educate
on the relevant basic biology. What
follows below is based on careful analysis of the journal articles adjusted for
marketing-science bias. For confirmation
of claims here made, go to http://healthfully.org/rc/
and /rl. Based on a large body of published journal
articles, three drugs are clearly very healthful. Aspirin
and natural hormones—estradiol and testosterone--have come under attack by
pharma (corporate medicine). Minor
health concerns with these drugs are blown out of proportion by junk science,
and their benefits contradicted by more marking (junk) science, or simply
ignored. The third Q10 is totally safe; thus
only its benefits are denied and/or ignored.
Pharma’s recommended doses are well below the ideal. That is to
be expected from profit seeking
corporations, since these drugs would dramatically lower the sales of their
block-busters. Moreover, physicians are
taught by pharma in continuing educations class that that if a patient insists on
taking aspirin or hormones, that because of “serious health risks” they should
be taken in the lowest dose for the shortest time. At http://healthfully.org/rc/index.html
you will find the evidence based upon meticulous journal research (links
provided) and the basic biology of the medical conditions. Remember
that Pharma hawks remedies by hyping
benefits and hiding side effects. They
do junk science to support those claims and to eliminate off-patent competition
such as from aspirin and hormones. The corporate forces
that shape the tobacco companies are at work upon pharma. Corporations are
profit-maximizing entities.
[1] NSAID are None Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug, this
includes naproxen in Aleve, ibuprofen, Celebrex, and over 30 others. Naproxen,
for example, has been shown when
taken long-term to increase the risk of heart attacks at least 50% and Celebrex
200%, yet both are widely prescribed for arthritis. Vioxx was removed by Merck
(pending FDA
actions) when it was shown to increase the death rate from heart attacks by
400% in a study on the prevention of Alzheimer’s disease.
[2] Prempro has been the leading selling
HRT
since the mid 40s in the US, and it still is.
The issues with MPA and mare’s urine estrogen have been know for decades
by scientist including those in the FDA, as too the superiority of the natural
HRT. Because of birth control pills,
HRT, and the possibility that an estrogen would protect men—as it does
women—from cardiovascular disease, there has been thousands of published
articles on the estrogen and progesterone family of hormones.
[3]
This control goes to setting up the conditions of the clinical trial and other
research, and then submitting the results doctored as their marketing
department finds efficacious, and holding back the raw data and negative
results, thus making editorial review by the journal a façade. They then use
the conclusions contained in a
short abstract to educate physicians about their product.
[4]
Thought leaders
are renowned specialists. Their rise to prominence is based on providing
services for pharma, for which most receive 6-digit income. Their success is dependent
upon being pharma “friendly”. They are the lecturers at continuing
educational classes, the lead researchers in journal articles, and they are
interviewed by the media.
|