Home | Book outline by chapters and subheadings | Abbreviation used repeatedly | Letter on book project sharing | Sickness growth and Burkitt & Trowell's seminal book | 2:1 The basic on sugar, and related topics | 2:6 Rancid Unsaturated fatty acids in cell membranes | 2:7 THE FAT STORY. History and Science | 3-1 Mitochondrdial structures and maintenance | 6:1 AUTOPHAGY, repair, replace, recycle, and defense systems | 6:2 HORMONAL HEALTH | 6:3 Diet basics: Energy restriction, keto, and fasting diets | 5:4 Diabetes pandemic & its natural cure | On the good life

Book on fructose, mitochondria, and the sickest of mammals

6:3 Diet basics: Energy restriction, keto, and fasting diets


6-3-Diet basics, caloric restriction, keto, fasting    7/10/20


 


File:Suckale08 fig3 glucose insulin day.png


Chapter 3:  Diet basics and t2d before meds:  1. Mediterranean diet   2. Why the Mediterranean diet works    3. Weight regulatory system (WRS), Biggest Loser   4. Blaming the victims    5 Three types of diet: caloric energy restriction, low carbs, and Atkins-keto diet   6. How bariatric surgery causes permanent weight loss    7. Going without food-fasting    8. Extended water fasting—Angus Barbieri record   9. Amino acids and insulin   10. A modern update on diet   11. Short list of what is best for dieting   12.  Personal note, how I ate the western diet and avoided CAWD


 


Abbreviation:  ATP adenosine triphosphate   B4 fructose, mitochondrial dysfunction, reduced production of ATP, reduced autophagy     CC contributing cause   CVD cardiovascular disease    CAWD conditions associated with the western diet    IER Intermittent fasting     IR insulin resistance   KOL key opinion leader-pharma’s stooges    MI myocardial infarction    mtDNA mitochondria DNA,   RAPT reduced production of ATP   t1d type-1 diabetes    t2d type-2 diabetes  Wiki Wikipedia     WRS weight regulatory system


This is not just a book roadmap book work written by KOLs to an audience of true believers, but a book which must clear the miles of dirt roads leading to cognitive dissonance and dependents on guidelines and their authors.  Some of you will want to arrive at where you started and know the place for the first time—quoting TS Eliot on science.  For this reason, I write in this chapter, e.g., on the Mediterranean diet, resistant carbs, why proteins raise insulin, and how KOLs have us treating elevated glucose instead of insulin resistance.      


 


1.    Mediterranean Diet:  There is something very wrong about the diet message we are given and thus the western diet.  More than half of dieters regain the majority of their weight loss within the first 12 months and less than one-third are able to avoid weight regain over a 3-year period.” [1]  The Mediterranean diet has been held up as a model because of those in trials who have switched to it had significant benefits, though well below those of the Mediterranean countries.  Given that the source in the media and who teach the CME calls believe that the low fat diet is cardio-protective, they have asked why are the CHD mortality rate averaging less than half that in the US though their fat intake, mostly saturated fats, is over 40% above the U.S.?  Given the results of dieting, the fix isn’t for most to diet, but rather to change the diet of our children (and thus adults) to be similar to the Mediterranean diet, or better.  So what is better in the Mediterranean diet? 


Though consuming about 40% more, mostly saturated than in the US, the US premature death rate from ischemic heart disease is rated at 1,476, while the French is 549, that is 2.7-fold greater in the US. [2]  And life averages reflect this:  the French women average is 85.7 years and the men is 79.8 (US is 72 years for men).  This difference of 7 years entails a lower rate of all chronic and fatal conditions, not just MI.  The reason for what has become termed “the French paradox” is that they consume about half the total sugar that Americans consume.[3]   Our media not wishing to finger our sugar consumption gives us is a long list of miracle foods and even there is an even longer list of good molecules in the scientific journals.  This list of crapolla creates cognitive dissonance.  Given what is at stake, industry is protecting their sugary-golden goose, and pharma the profits from illness. 


       That protection is working.  My search of the literature has not found the link of fructose to MTDD, and the low sugar benefits of the Mediterranean diet.  In his Mitochondria in Health and Disease, 2018, Ray Griffiths explains (pgs. 136-37) with journal references as proof states what is good about the Mediterranean diet: 


Many components of the Mediterranean diet support mitochondria in subtle but incredibly important ways.  For example, plant compounds can activate mitochondria-support endogenous antioxidants, protection against aerobic-glycolysis (Ferramosca & Zara 2014a) and can help block mitochondria reactive oxygen species (ROS) induction by pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) from gut microbiota (Morris et al. 2015a).  Additionally, the low glycemic index of plant fiber, whole grains and nuts can help protect mitochondria from extremely damaging-effects of high blood sugar (Rodriguez-Rejon et al. 2014; Yan 2014). 


Olive oil polyphenols can also protect against neurodegeneration and depression by increasing the expression of neurotrophins such as nerve growth fact (NGF) (Carito et al. 2016).  This neurotrophin helps to concentrate mitochondria at sites for axon growth in neurons.  Without mitochondrial ATP, axon growth is inhibited (Hroudova and Fisar 2011). . . . Interestingly, social enrichment is another potential source of the neuotrophin NGF (Brachi et al. 2006) found to support mitochondria-dependent axon growth within neurons (Hrodova & Fisar, 2011).


Impressive evidence, but as I said the standards for science are compromised to protect sugar. Griffiths claim for antioxidants making the difference is inflating the mouse to elephant size.  Surprisingly, the single greatest contributor to the total antioxidant intake was coffee” and chocolate came in second at 1/5th that of coffee.” [4] Shelve polyphenols and other antioxidants.  Given that LSPs are health without supplements, drink wine, we can shelve the rest of putative solutions.  As by now you know, sugar is the elephant in the room.   


There is a social trait whereby our analytic part of the brain creates explanations of phenomena when there is a need.  Even Dr. Lee Know, who has built upon MTD basics the causes for CAWD, who teaches about health, has a very good grasp of processes, and understands the role of the mitochondria and ATP, both of which are at the center of his explanation of CAWD, he falls short because he has missed the role of glycation, sugar, and fructose.[5]  Dr. Know, for example, believes fats are toxic and free fatty acids the most toxic.[6]  I bring up Griffith and Know because there is much of value in their books, and there are limits.  A survey of the field, put topics in their current context, is an essential starting point for the topic of diets.


 


2.  Why the Mediterranean diet works: The first study of this diet was in the 50’s based upon Italians who ate a peasant diet.[7]  They eat real foods and have little added sugars.  From their positive results a number of additional studies were done over the decades.  But without knowing the cause for the pathogenic differences, the number of candidates used explicatively is long and in this insignificant.  The recently published PREDIMED randomised controlled trial was stopped early after it showed that in high risk people, the Mediterranean diet achieved a 30% improvement over a “low fat” diet in terms of cardiovascular events.” [8]  The standard answer as to why the benefit:


The all-embracing term 'Mediterranean diet' should not be used in scientific literature.”  Among errors:  “olive oil consumption is negligible… Mediterranean countries tend to consume relatively high amounts of [saturated] fat, they have far lower rates of cardiovascular disease than in countries like the United States, where similar levels of fat consumption are found…The most popular dietary candidate, olive oil, has been undermined by a body of experimental evidence that diets enriched in monounsaturated fats such as olive oil are not athero-protective when compared to diets enriched in either polyunsaturated or even saturated fats.  A healthy active lifestyle (notable a physically active lifestyle or larbour) is also beneficial… red wine … contains flavonoids with powerful antioxidant properties… The proposed mechanism is solar UVB-induced synthesis [sun] of Vitamin D in the oils of the skin, which has been observed to reduce the incidence of coronary heart disease, and which rapidly diminishes with increasing latitude….  A recent randomized Spanish trial of diet pattern published in The New England Journal of Medicine in 2013 followed almost 7,500 individuals over around 5 years found that individuals on a Mediterranean diet supplemented with mixed nuts and olive oil had a 30 percent reduction in risk of having a major cardiovascular event and a 49 percent decrease in stroke risk.  A 10-year study found that adherence to a Mediterranean diet and healthful lifestyle was associated with more than a 50% lowering of early death rates.[9]


As Gary Taubes points out that put people on a diet to lose weight and among the changes is a reduction in sugar.  Candies, sodas, fruit juices are all reduced, and there are other healthful changes by some such as exercise and smoking cessation.


 


Undoubted influenced by pharma’s thought leaders (KOLs), the 2016 Wikipedia article is a survey, a kitchen-sink full of garbage & no mention of sucrose, fructose, refined carbs, or glycation and the 2020 update still lacks the villains of sugar, glycation, fatty liver, and insulin resistance—and fasting and MTDD are off the radar map. 


The Mediterranean region has other healthful differences besides less sugar: lower PUFAs, higher saturated fats and monounsaturated fats, less manufactured foods, more physically active, lower consumption of pills, and less smoking.  Having lower rate of IR entails a lower rate of obesity and diabetes. Population studies will find many difference causes, causes that are dependent on the author’s beliefs.    




[1] Brunner, Eric, Martin Shipley, et al, Jan 2006 Relation between blood glucose and coronary mortality over 33 years in the Whitehall Study.  At 6 years over 95% of the obese have regained over half the weight loss—excluding those who had bariatric surgery.  The WRS is working longterm 

[2] IHME (The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation) at the University of Washington, http://www.healthdata.org/ Dec 2019. 

[3] Frustratingly the Google search has become every increasingly commercial, and entering in “sugar consumption France” doesn’t take me to the right page--time wasted effect productivity   Numbers that should be easily available for sugar and coronary events, they simply aren’t. and it is by designed of the business think-tanks and corporate media.  Marketing is about sales; evidence is about making a better choice.  We have marketing, and our pro-ruling corporatism adversely affects the information flow.  Consumer Report Magazine functions to fill that gap, as too the reviews on Amazon.  If we had a populist government, one of their functions would be to counter market by published product surveys, and putting them on product labels, like the energy of some appliances.  Cars should have on their window not just MPG, but also average repair costs per year.       

[4] Svilaas, Arne, Amrit Sakhi, et al, March 2004 (Oxford) Journal of Nutrition, Intakes of Antioxidants in Coffee, Wine, and Vegetables Are Correlated with Plasma Carotenoids in Humans

[5] Lee Know N.D. Mitochondria and the future of medicine¸2016. 

[6] Supra 93

[7]   The village of Pioppi and surrounding area (south of Naples) the source for data on the Mediterranean diet in the 50s. at. 

[8] Malhotra, Aseem, Oct 2013, Saturated fat is not the major issue

[9] Wiki, Mediterranean diet, Aug 2016.  This has since been removed from Wiki.  Troubling is the “talking points” which exclude a comparison for conditions between the US and those of the different Mediterranean countries, or any of the health issues covered in my work such as low rancid fats, drug usage, sugar content, and manufactured foods.  The December 2019 articles lists benefits for the diet for the cancer rate, diabetes, obesity, and cognitive ability, but no quantifications.   




3.  The weight regulatory system (WRS) and the biggest losers:  this is at the heart of why calorie restricted diets fail; the system turns on to preserve the adipocytes set level of fats stored through hormonal regulations of which 6 are produced in the adipocytes.  The other barrier is that with IR the adipocytes, depending on degree of IR and social environment, will reset as weight is gained after a period of time (I guess at 1 to 2 years depending on age, hormones, fatty liver, and physical activity). Once set, the WRS will cause the regaining of weight for years until the set point has been reach, and depending on the degree of insulin resistance can cause continuation of weight gain after reaching the old set point.  


Free-living humans are especially vulnerable to the effects of obesogenic environmental and behavioural pressures, which pose a significant barrier for the continued success of weight-loss attempts. This is further compounded by elevations in metabolic efficiency (whereby energy expenditure declines beyond that predicted from the change in metabolic mass) and


appetite which accompany weight-loss, and may ultimately predispose to weight regain.  Moreover, changes in neural activity within brain regions known to be involved in regulatory, emotional and cognitive control of food intake have been observed following weight loss.[1]


          This process of regaining has been called the yo-yo diet.   Caloric energy restriction (CER) has been shown to work year after year in a TV contest, The Biggest Losers. In a boot-camp for the obese, contestants compete for cash.  They are on the healthful standard “move more, eat less” program.  There were 16 contestants in the 2009 season of which 6 men and 8 women agreed to participate in the follow-up study 6 years later.  These 14 lost an average of 38% of their weight, 127 pounds over the 30-week show.  CER works for contestants, but for how long?


In the Journal article and New York Times articles on The Biggest Losers, it showed that they at 6 years the 14 had regained 71% of their weight, and “Weight regain was not significantly correlated with metabolic adaptation at the competition's end (r= −0.1, P = 0.75), but those subjects maintaining greater weight loss at 6 years also experienced greater concurrent metabolic slowing (r = 0.59, P = 0.025).”[2]  The averages at baseline were 35 years, weight 327 lbs., BMI of 49.5, percentage fat 49%,   At end of show, 30 weeks, weight 199 lbs., BMI 30, percentage fat 28%,  Weight gain at 6 years would have been a greater if they excluded the one contestant, Rudy Pauls, who prior to surgery had regained 167 lbs.  Rudy after bariatric surgery lost 102 pounds, thus at 6 years he was just 65 heavier than at end of show.  His metabolism at the end of the show had dropped by 804 calories, after surgery it was 520 calories less than baseline 6 years before.[3]  Excluding Paul, only one contestant at 6 years their basal metabolism had improved compared to at the end of the show, the other 12 had a further decline in metabolism than week 30.  The contestants 6 years later eat hundreds of calories less than people of a comparable size just to maintain their new size.  All 14 contestants at 6 years had a decline in metabolism.  At 6-years for Mark, his metabolism was 525 calories below at the start of the show.  Only one contestant, Erinn Edbert, kept the weight off (and afterwards lost 25 pounds more), but her metabolism dropped at end of show just 30 calories, but at 6 years it was 570 calories lower than baseline.  This is about 30% less calories to maintain her weight loss.  She was the only contestant to continue to lose weight.   Danny Cahill, the biggest lost 235 pounds of which he restored 105 pounds by the 6th year.  All the contestant experienced a very significant reduction in metabolism at the 6-year mark, their WRSs were still functioning to cause weight gain. 


The processes are controlled by hormonal systems designed through evolution to promote survival.  Slow starvation as supported by the example of the Biggest Losers show that CER is for the long-term overweight a fix that fails.  What is known as the yo-yo diet. 


There are hormones that regulate weight, and if the system has been rest to 350 pounds, it will function to maintain that weight.  In a social environment those controls can be overridden.  Remove the social environment, the boot camp, and the controls again dominate.  How much weight depends on both how much repair occurred during the boot camp, and how much.


 


4. Blaming the victims:  Industry and their puppets blame the victim, and not the food manufacturers.  In the UK the BBC has done a series of documentaries exposing the role of the food manufacturers who put profits before people, the same has been done in Australia and Canada, and I assume in the other European countries.  So what are the major ways to blame the victims in the US?


The weak-willed yo-yo dieters:  an example is all but one of the Biggest Losers.  Ignored is Leptin and the other hormones that control appetite and metabolism.  The second errors is that the brain doesn’t and the hormones that regulate functions are not controlling.   The weal-willed  is based on a theory that the homunculus (commonly called a soul or mind) controls behavior over the hormonal regulatory system.  The neuroscience has shown that the brain is in charge, but the common mimi[4] is that the homunculus/soul is the decider.  I will resist going into neuroscience, but recommend Free Will and Free Won’t at http://www.skeptically.org/spiritualism/id11.html.  The brain rules, including what is thought and said.  That the rational module isn’t aware of the brain functions promotes the illusion that it is in control.  It is part of the input for what is done, but it isn’t the decider.  I will leave you with that proposition since it is beyond the scope of CAWD.    


Those who succeed, which for long-term overweight is under 10%, occurs because of details not mentioned, such as bariatric surgery, extended fasting (#7), amphetamines, illness, chemotherapy that damages the digestive system, and others less common.  The example above of Mrs. Errin Edbert mainly turns upon the relief of boredom caused naturally by the reduction in the rate of metabolism.  The reduction in brain and physical activity is popular not just among HSPs and LSPs, both populations which have a significant numbers of those who regular take substances such as ethanol, marijuana, and neuroleptic drug, and among the paleo there is a long list of herbal drugs,[5]  Mrs. Edbert in the biggest losers, her brain chose the body’s way of relieving boredom, which was probably supported by the social environment.  Sure, the rational module[6] contributes, but it doesn’t control.  Everyone knows that smoking shorten life and reduces its quality; thus if reason ruled there wouldn’ t be cigarettes, pipes, and cigars.  


Gluttony and sloth are commonly used to explain why people gain weight and retain it.  The phrase is used as a character description.  It could be caused by inheritance or by the mind, which thus is another way to point the blame the victim for the above weak will.  The inheritance is to blame their genes, a version of the thrifty gene theory.  This explanation excludes the food manufacturers, media, and blames the victim.


Thrifty gene theory merits more space since those who should know better, don’t, including Robert Lustig and Richard J. Johnson (see bibliography) for their books--both books of high quality by widely published authors.  It is a popular excuse for why we get fat, the genes made us.  This implies that we have a system different than other mammals. 


Genes are used to explain the failure to lose weight.  She has thrifty genes; thank-god I wasn’t born with them!  Her body is programmed to store fat to promote survival during a food shortage; that is why she puts the weight back on.  This theory assumes there is a survival advantage during scarcity of food thus the genes for being overweight are selected for among Homo sapiens; but is there.  


  First, it is unlikely that the paleo ancestor would have zero food.  These hunter-gatherers have secondary, less-favored sources of food during draughts or other events affecting their food supply.  Starvation is not common.  Second, the news reports of famine are not among the paleo peoples, but the areas which depend on farming with a typically 10-fold denser population.  Third there isn’t a mammalian model for thrifty gene:  when there is plenty of food there isn’t obese species, expect by design.  Design such as when there is long migration or hibernation.  The mechanism for increase fat is through insulin resistance,[7] and there is a biological clock.[8]  Weight is so important for survival that the palate doesn’t control it.  That since doesn’t cause morbid obesity in mammals, and they can lose the weight after migration or hibernation.  Why can’t we.  The only explanation that fits the facts is that our WRS on a cellular level is broken. 


An obese person is a target for arrows, stones, and spears, common causes of death.  Obesity is selected against, unless it promotes survival as in cold climates for the whale and walrus, or for sexual selection, the male walrus.  A broken system causes obesity.[9]  The Rhino, hippo, and elephant have muscle and thick hides, not large stores of fat.  I too have a thick hide that protects me from casuistry of all types.  Through sexual select obesity is  strongly selected against,  On top of that a person with an extra 50 lbs. their risk of death by 50%.[10] A thrifty gene would be strongly selected against.   


An addition to the theory of thrifty gene is added by Richard Johnson who combines the uricase gene deletion which occurs in apes and guinea pigs.  He argues that during the ice age there is a selective advantage to the deletion of the uricase gene (4:1, 6, also known as urate oxidase), which causes a higher level in the apes of uric acid.  The effect of the deletion is higher uric acid which Johnson proposes causes increased conversion of fructose to fatty acids—a plus during the ice age with scarcity of food.  “The Uricase Mutation enhanced the ability of fructose to increase fat stores and insulin resistance.”[11]  For a researcher with both skills in writing and analysis this is a howler.  First, the mutation occurred first among the tropical apes, who were not subjected to the ice age and long before the split to from homo Sapiens.  Second, the elevated uric acid causes increased DNL is less than certain, since DNL is a response to inadequate ATP; thus the role of uric acid in production of ATP hasn’t been confirmed.  Fourth, Why would the guinea pig also have that mutation (and possible other untested mammals).  Fifth, articles on uricase suggest that there was based on current primate population a decline in uricase activity among many of the primates.  Why have hominids gone one step further, the mutations removing uricase production?  Sixth, the Wikipedia article and other suggest that the increased uric acid was for its antioxidant action.  “Uric acid is a powerful antioxidant and scavenges of single oxygen and radicals.  Its presences provide protection from oxidative damage, thus prolonging life and decreasing age-specific cancer rates.” [12]  This wiki article analysis fails for the other hominids aren’t that long-lived, other mammals are long lived without the mutation, and the guinea pig is short lived.  The uricase mutations remain a mystery, for which Johnson’s solution falls short.  We all at times fall on our face.  His The fat switch is among the best of books on western diet and diseases.       


 


5. Three types of diets:  caloric energy restriction, low fat high carbs, and Atkins-keto diet:  As covered above the caloric energy restriction (CER) has few successes because the WRS increases hunger and reduces metabolism. Heads on studies comparing low carbs to high fat diets have shown that fat is better than carbs.  Moreover, compliance is low in the CER diet because of leptin increasing hunger and making the dieter feeling crappy and moody because of the reduction in the rate of metabolism.  Life-long changes in diet is an issue with diets.  CER is seldom a lifestyle change because of the action of leptin, and the low carb Atkins-keto diet because of social pressures and simply put sugar and carbs taste good to us—but not to carnivores. 


The western low fat diet is life-long, or should I say, life shortening?  The low fat and low cholesterol diet is the food manufacturers wet dream, less eggs, meats, expensive saturated fats, and more carbs.  Low fat foods are bland; mother nature wants us to eat plenty of fats--as most paleo peoples do.  To improve flavor, the food manufacturers have upped the sugar, for which by biology there is a reinforcing response in the brain, and sugar is much cheaper than vegetable oils.  The net result of the high sugar diet that causes insulin resistance, and with that is weight gain and increased calories—more sales.  And pharma profits from the pathogenic pathway.


The assault on the American diet has been going on for over a century by the Sugar Institute and food manufacturers, and we are seeing the toxic results.[13]   


          In the widely reported A to Z trial, which was published in the JAMA, compared low carb with high fat and proteins to 2 energy restricted diets with varying amounts of protein and fats and the LEARN program of exercise and eating less.  Atkin’s (Keto) diet doesn’t restrict calories, only carbs, while the others restrict calories and the Zone diet is higher in fat but less than the Atkins, and with moderate carbs.  The Ornish diet is a very low fat diet, and moderate protein, very high carbs vegetarian diet.  The results hands-down favored the Atkin’s diet averaging nearly twice the weight loss. 


In this major head to head study funded by the NIH, 4 popular diets were compared in a randomized 1-year trial with 1-year follow up, conducted from 2003 to 2005.  Three hundred and eleven free-living overweight/obese, non-diabetic premenopausal women were assigned to one of 4 diets.  Atkins, LEARN, Ornish, and Zone diets.  


Diet and Physical Activity Data. Dietary intake data were collected by telephone-administered, 3-day, unannounced, 24-hour dietary recalls using Nutrition Data System for Research software, Versions. . . The recalls occurred on 2 weekdays and 1 weekend day per time point, on nonconsecutive days whenever possible. A “food amounts booklet” was u sed to assist participants with portion size estimation.  Energy expenditure was assessed using the well-established Stanford 7-day physical activity recall.  In all 4 diet groups, 85% to 89% of participants attended at least 75% of their assigned classes.[14]


Only the Atkins diet did not require energy restriction; even so the kcal/day was within the range of the other 3 diets—protein and fats have a higher satiating score than the carbohydrates and therefore a reduction in calories and an even greater reduction in ATP because Atkins is also a high protein diet and also because per calorie the ATP production of fats (rated at 10 calories per gram is less than for carbohydrates rated at 4 calories per gram.[15] 


Surprising to the Stanford group who administered the trial, the Atkins group lost over twice as many kilograms:  4.7 for Atkins and 2.2 average for the others 3 in the trial.  The trial lead Prof. Christopher Gardner of Stanford, a vegetarian, spun the conclusion to support his belief: “While questions remain about long-term effects and mechanisms, a low-carbohydrate, high protein, high fat diet may be considered a feasible alternative recommendation for weight loss.” (supra, 969).  Why not say, given those numbers that the Atkins diet had twice the weight loss of the four popular diets?  


          On looking at the dietary numbers these results are strong evidence for the conclusion that strict adhesion to the Atkins diet for most is not necessary and that with a mere 22% increase in calories from fat and a 289 calories less per day they lost more than the other 3 CER diets with normal carbs or increased carbs.  Fats for the Atkins went at baseline 36.2% of calories to 44.3% at 12 months and calories at baseline went from 1888 kcal/d to 1599 at 12 months, a 15% reduction in calories.” [16]  The numbers were similar as to calories and energy expenditure at baseline compared to 12 months for all 4 diets. 


All the diets showed significantly greater adherence at 2 months, but by the 6th month adherence significantly declined.  This is consistent with many, many other diets, in that around 2.5 months, leptin levels change to conserve fat, and weight loss is modest thereafter.  The point is that that increasing fats and staying with low sugar is the big difference.  Those on the Atkins diet would have had lower sugar at 12 months than the other 3 diets (though not measured in this trial, which swallowed the lipid-cholesterol fallacy).  Those with the greatest IR would have to notch up the adherence, and I would recommend increasing the fat and dropping net carbs to about 15% of calories or less if need, and adding intermittent fasting, and the worse cases would need to add alternate day fasting (#7-8).  In other words, they would need to stay longer in the fat metabolizing and autophagy phases.     


I smell a KOL not just from what he said and his being selected as lead author.  Christopher Gardner is an outspoken vegetarian.  Second he could have selected the top quintal of each group for comparison, since those would have the greatest compliance which given the protocol of the trial is a significant issue.  Third, it is common for those with a bias to spin both the conclusion and the abstract, which is what I found.  Fourth our government’s record of health science is in support of industry, with a few exceptions.  Is this an exception?


9        The numbers for the carbohydrate consumption of those on the Atkins diet indicate very low compliance and compliance given that major weight loss requires ketosis.  “Fats for the Atkins cohort went at baseline 36.2% of calories to 44.3% at 12 months and calories at baseline went from 1888 kcal/d to 1599 at 12 months, a 15% reduction in calories.” [17]  The numbers for fat of those on an Atkins diet should have been around 70% with about 25% protein and 5% carbohydrates.  Overall compliance was not just poor in this self-reporting study for Atkins but also for the LEARN,[18] Ornish, and Zone diets.[19]  The first 2 months of the Atkins diet followed the recommended 20 grams of carbohydrate (5%) for the induction phase, and raised to 50 grams per day for the subsequent 10 months which is 12.5% of calories from carbs.  However, assuming 25% of calories from proteins, the average carbohydrates is 31% or 124 grams a day, 2.5 times the 50 grams allowed in the maintenance phase.  A study of the compliance of the 232 women in the A to –Z trial found, “Given these low numbers, no further data are presented comparing absolutely adherent vs nonadherent participants. . . . In general, absolute adherence to all three dietary guidelines was very low.” [20]  Note the ketogenic diet, such as used for intractable epilepsy is at 5%, as too diet for starving cancer.  Thus the high amount of carbs under-estimates the effectiveness of the Atkin’s diet; that amount of carbs causes a Randle cycle switch that reduces metabolic rate, not just fat metabolism, typically during the 2nd month of the diet.  The A-to Z comparison study conforms to other that show in the real world a compliance is low.   


Gardener is not the only Professor to let his beliefs cloud his reasoning processes.  In the Scientific American of 2015, a full article was written in response to Dean Ornish’s in the New York Times.  They gave the task to their science writer:


Ornish goes to argue that protein and saturated fat increase the risk of mortality and chronic disease. As evidence for these causal claims, he cites a handful of observational studies. He should know better. These types of studies—which might report that people who eat a lot of animal protein tend to develop higher rates of disease—“only look at association, not causation,” explains Christopher Gardner, a nutrition scientist at the Stanford Prevention Research Center. They should not be used to make claims about cause and effect; doing so is considered by nutrition scientists to be “inappropriate” and “misleading.” The reason: People who eat a lot of animal protein often make other lifestyle choices that increase their disease risk, and although researchers try to make statistical adjustments to control for these “confounding variables,” as they’re called, it’s a very imperfect science. Other large observational studies have found that diets high in fat and protein are not associated with disease and may even protect against it. The point is, it’s possible to cherry-pick observational studies to support almost any nutritional argument.[21]


Moyer then goes on to give some of the evidence that fats are heart healthier than carbs (which includes gobs of fructose on the western diet). 


          For those who like the video format a series of educational, mostly excellent coverage of topics, which averages 16 minutes, with excellent supporting video materials, done under the pseudonym of What I’ve Learned, with a number of them on diet.  This one covers the crapolla of Harvard professor Kim Williams whose references to his meta-analysis doesn’t support his claims


***** Obesity and diabetes explained: the overflow phenomenon 16 min, 538,000 views, Oct 2018, What I’ve Learned.  Starts with history, good basics such as insulin causes fat storage, and rebuttal of bad studies, but failed to mention industry funding or going into the biology behind ketogenic diet—covered elsewhere. He shows how KOLs lie to the public & physicians  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xlfZvnV4v50  Excellent                                      Part II is  Can you cure diabetes/does fat cause diabetes


          Of the gems in this 16-minute video, it takes to task the claim of Harvard cardiologist Kim Williams who, said “No one should be doing the ketogenic diet.  It is an article with Williams quote as title Sept 5, 2018,[22] and with over forty reference in support of the meta-study. He supported this statement by a meta-analysis of 17 studies—sounds good!  The claim was based upon the finding that the low carb diet increased heart conditions and mortality. Seventeen of the studies his studies were based on questionaires, moreover, none of these studies mentioned a ketogenic diet.  One of these studies Kim used wrote in its conclusion:  “Our results do not support a clear, general association between LCHP score and mortality.”   Four studies showed better outcomes with low carbohydrate diet.  Eight of the studies used did not specify the amount of carbohydrates consumed.  The ten studies that specified amount of carbs well above the level for a ketogenic diets.  Low carb is 10% of calories, and ketogenic 5%.  The lowest of the studies, 2 of them were 25% of calories from carbs, and the remaining 7 studies were at or above 30% carbs, which is 6 times higher than ketogenic diet.  In summary Williams deliberately lied in his published meta-study.  What percentage of the readers will check his references?  What percentage of reader will assume the evidence supports the standard recommendations of move more, eat less, less fats, and that the popular ketogenic diet is just another fad diet?  Very few readers have the background to recognize his tobacco science.  


While the ketogenic diet has taken off like the Atkins diet of 40 years ago.  They are brothers in that both are very low carbs (5 to 10% for the keto & Atkins diets), and thus high in fats.  At above 10% of calories, I would not consider it an Atkins-ketogenic diet because of the carbohydrate’s effect upon ketosis (fat metabolism).  It is thus important to stay in the under 10% range, because of what is called the keto flu, a period lasting several hours.  I call it hitting the wall, referring to when an athlete runs out of energy.  Going in and out of ketosis has this price.[23]  It is part of the body’s adjustment to fat as the only source for the production of ATP, a metabolic switch conserve ATP occurs during the switching process. One way of avoiding it is to start with a 36 hour fast. 


The new Atkins diet which limits proteins, I find the science for it flawed (#9),[24] and would have a lower rate of adherence.  With less protein, there should be a lower adherence in the New Atkins diet.  Proteins have a higher satiety rating, and fill as the pleasing the palate the gap left by carbs from breads, beans, etc.  The quick boost in energy from digestible carbs is a strong reinforcer, thus satiety reduces the hunger for carbs.   As for adverse health consequences of high protein, that hasn’t been shown by quality studies.


          This pattern of very low carbs reminds me of the niacin story for lowering cholesterol.  The official recommendation is a high dose, 1,500 to 3,000 mgs which causes unpleasant flushing lasting about 10 minutes, and the peak level of serum niacin is half hour, with half-life under one hour.  Moreover, cholesterol is made by the liver at night, and over 70% of cholesterol is produced by the body.  Thus few will follow the recommended niacin treatment for hypercholesterolemia. 


In my extensive research lasting over 2-months on niacin and its related compounds, I found out that cholesterol medications should be taken at night.  A study in the 1960s followed that in their protocol in a clinic where blood levels of cholesterol were measured during the night for the cholesterol lower effect of niacin and 3 other related compounds.  I knew that the liver makes cholesterol at night, when other metabolic and catabolic demands are low, but I hadn’t realized what that entailed until I read the article.  Thus by 2010, I had concluded that a low-dose, slow release at night would be more effective than a high dose of niacin (or a statin) in the daytime.   See http://healthfully.org/rc/id4.html for my extensive research on niacin.[25]  So why would the standard be 3 grams of niacin with it side effect of hot flush feeling lasting about 15 minutes.  This creates a compliance issue.  II see this pattern repeated with the keto diet, very low carbs-creates a compliance issue. 


I also believe, on weak journal evidence, that mega niacin has antibiotic property.  A journal article so stated and the high amount made by yeast, supports such antimicrobial action.  On that basis, with the excess niacin excreted in the urine, it might help cure a UTI (urinary-track infection) depending upon strain of bacteria.   The colony might exist in tissue not exposed to the high concentration of niacin in urine.  The best and safest treatment are the sulfa drugs.  I tell you this because the physician’s computer directing his prescription writing won’t mention sulfa drugs—it is up to the patient. 


          Back to the question of best diet.  During the weight loss phase, carbs should be kept at a minimum.  On weak evidence, but personal observations and journal articles and books, they have caused me to believe that a diet of 85% of calories from fat (not counting proteins ) and 15% from carbs in the maintenance phase works once the youthful weight has been obtained.  If weight is gained than lower carbs.  One reason is that consumption of a modest amount of carbs won’t throw the Randle cycle switch to fat storage. Some of the evidence in support of this hypothesis is that following bariatric surgery, during the first two weeks the diabetic make major improvements, some of whom are off their diabetic drugs.  Secondly the success of Michael Mosley’s diet plan (see bibliography) based on his combination of fasting (#7).  It permits during fasting days 500 calories for women, and 600 for men—no restriction on carbs (I think there should be).  His plan (book was an international best seller) has a much higher long-term compliance than a ketogenic diet.  More research is needed on the level of insulin, proteins, and carbs that operates the Randle cycle, and also the hormonal changes that affect metabolism and appetite.  


In fact, I find Atkins works with its maintenance phase effective, but most drift back to excessive carbs, and like in the The Biggest Losers (#3) regain slowly their weight.  The New Atkins diet claims that moderate protein produces superior results, a change that I find the evidence lack and contrary to evolutionary biology and the androgenic role of insulin (#9).  Atkins is high protein and high fats.  Atkins recommended that once the lean weight is obtained, that carbs can be gradually be reintroduced to the point where weight is gained.  At that amount of carbs, (say 25% of calories, then back off about 5% so not gain weight.  The New-Atkins Diet recommends no more than 20% of saturated fats, thus high in the rancid PUFAs—stupid ignorance of the science and catering to popular belief (4:4, 4).    


I have seen over and over again those who have not followed the maintenance level recommendation and have gained most of their lost weight.  I have seen the same with the Medfast diet, once off the plan the WRS restores gradually the previous level of obesity.  Medfast is a very low calorie, low fat diet, with prepared foods and powder mixes and weekly counseling.  We live in a toxic social including media environment, and the research on yo-yo dieting is often just number gathering.  There is need for research as to when the leptin and other hormones stop operating for gaining weight and the cause for this change.  Observational studies need to go beyond numbers gather and examine hormonal changes that cause weight gain.


          Dieting has a very low success rate for those with long-term excess weight of more than 20% their lean body weight.  We have reviewed the failure of The Biggest Losers (#3), the modest results of the A to Z trial (#5), and we all know of the yo-yo diet.  Not all is gloom:   bariatric surgery has been able for some to bring about long-term weight loss and for most to cure t2d.  Does the same apply to the ketogenic diet?  Does it get past the hormonal regulatory system?


Atkins-Ketogenic diet:  Beyond the A to Z trial, ketogenic diet has consistently outperformed the calorie restricted diet. It is simple, limit net carbs to 50 grams a day or less (net carbs are total carbs minus fiber).  The original KD was designed as a 4:1 lipid:nonlipid ratio, with 80% of daily energy intake from fat, 15% protein, and 5% carbohydrate.” [26]   In 6:4 #4 the many health benefits are listed.  These benefits come from turning up the healing processes, autophagy, by maintaining low insulin (6:1).  As for weight loss, those that adhere to it have the pounds melt off.   


A neighbor and friend of mine in under 4 months, from September through December of 2019 lost 38 pounds.  I saw Margret regularly and often walked with her and her 2 dogs.  She told me that this was her third time on the Atkins diet, the first time she weighed 219 pounds.  Margret at the age of 38 lost a pound a day and in less than 3 months returned to her youthful 135 pounds.  I found that hard to believe, then accepted it based on my observation of her weight loss in just under 4 months, where she has gone from 178 to 140.  Her normal weight at 5’9” is 135 pounds.  At the age of 63 she said this time was significant more difficult, took longer.  Margret said the hardest thing was giving up eating fruits.  She understood the biology behind the ketogenic diet.  I didn’t have to explain mitochondria and ATP.  She understood that with declining MTD functions the rate of weight loss was slower this time around. 


I did explain to her about autophagy, Ketogenic diet turning it up, and the metabolism of the excess fat in the liver and pancreas; science not in the books on ketogenic and Atkins diets.  I suggested a morning fast, and she told me that she normally skips lunch.  It makes me smile inside to know that some people see further in my senior community.    


Another neighbor has done the same.  Started near the end of a bout of gastroenteritis.[27]  Having gained about 20 pounds over the last 10 years she went on an Atkins diet.  Stephanie’s 5-months of general malaise and stool problems was cured—possible helped by her change in diet.  Within 3 months she had lost the excess pounds, at 5 foot 1, 20 pounds shows up. 


          Adherence has two foes, that of the social environment, including a mead loaded with food ads and cooking shows.  The second is that of a craving for carbohydrates mainly because of extreme low carbohydrates requires the glycogenesis in the liver to supply the needs of the most common type of cells, the erythrocytes which lacking mitochondria, rely upon fermentation in the cytosol to produce ATP—there is no process in the cytosol for the production of ATP from fats. 


          As for the weight loss on an Atkins type diet the evidence in journals is on short-term, trials, all with the major issue of compliance, and lacking tracking participants for more than a year.  Except for tobacco science, significant funding for decisive trails has not been available.


          The best I could find was a The prospective study was carried out at the Academic Department of Surgery, Consultation and Training Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University (Jabriya, Kuwait) in 83 obese subjects (39 men and 44 women).”  [28]  The decline in the rate of weight loss in this 24-week study indicates a lack of compliance, since the keto diet avoids the effects of leptin at 8 weeks.  Other indicators are their triglyceride level which should have been lower, as to the fasting glucose which leveled off at 5.65 mmol/L at week 16 through to the 24th week.  From week 8 it was as 5.8, at baseline it was 7.3 mmol/L.   Compared to the results of Margret, and there are many other case examples and the well documented issue of compliance, the ketogenic diet, short of starvation, is the most effective for those who comply with the 5% carbohydrate limit and follow it by the 10% maintenance. 


          The science behind the weight loss finds 4 ways in which a KD improves weight loss compared to CER.


The possible reasons for the effectiveness of KD for weight loss may be listed as follows, in order of evidence, strongest first:


  1. Appetite reduction: protein satiety, effects on appetite-related hormones such as ghrelin, and possibly a sort of direct appetite-blocking effect of KB
  2. Reduced lipogenesis and increased fat oxidation
  3. A reduction in respiratory quotient may indicate a greater metabolic efficiency in fat oxidation

A thermic effect of proteins and



[1] Antoni, Rona, Kelly Johnston, et al, March 2014, The Effects of Intermittent Energy Restriction on Indices of Cardiometabolic Health

[2] Fothergill, Erin, Juen Guo, et al, May 2016, Persistent metabolic adaptation 6 years after “The Biggest Loser” competition

[3] A though on the net result of losing significant weight as to caloric needs.  Suppose a 100 pounds of fat is lost.  Since the adipose tissue use of ATP is quite low—after all is an energy storage vault, it has a very low rate of metabolism, compared to myocytes.  Thus a person who goes from 400 pounds to 300, shouldn’t all things being equal expect his metabolism to drop by 25%, but  a bit less than 10% (I don’t know of on-point studies).  Thus Paul hasn’t with bariatric surgery has stopped the WRS from lowering his metabolism to restore the lost weight.   

[4] Mind virus, coined by Richard Dawkins, for false beliefs that are passed around like a virus. 

[5] Plants of the Gods, is a seminal work by two giants, Richard Evans Schultes and Albert Hofmann, which was updated in new edition in 2001 by othes.  Over 100 plants are listed with information on their neuro-active chemicals. 

[6] The module description of the brain is used both in evolutionary psychology and in neuroscience. 

[7] Shi, Shu-qun, Tasneem Ansari, et al March 2013, Circadian disruption leads to insulin resistance and obesity.  They used Bmal-1 knock-out mice to demonstrate the mechanism.  Moreover, clock-disrupted Bmal1-knockout mice are locked into the trough of insulin action and lack rhythmicity in insulin action and activity patterns.”. 

[8] Okamura, Hitoshi, Shun Yamaguchi, et al, July 2002, Molecular machinery of circadian clock in mammals

[9] There are few rare exceptions where social conditioning (status) creates in a select sub-population obesity; e.g.. the Suma wrestler

[10] The Merck Manual, 8th Edition, 1950, p 266. 

[11] The fat switch, P 71.

[12] Wiki, Urate oxidase, Dec 2019. 

[13] Moss, Michael, Salt sugar fat:  how the food giants hooked us, 2014.  While telling the history of food manufacturers function, we get a glimpse of profits before people.   

[14] Gardner, Christopher, Alexandre Kiazand, et al, March 2007, JAMA, Comparison of the Atkins, Zone, Ornish,

and LEARN Diets for Change in Weight and Related Risk Factors Among Overweight Premenopausal Women

[15] Based on the production of pyruvate per calories, there are about 1/3rd more calories per pyruvate from palmitic acid compared to glucose; this is a rough approximation in a much more complex process.  I failed to find an article comparing per calorie or per gram the production of ATP. 

 

[16] Proteins were increased from baseline to 24% at 12 months, Supra P 973. 

[17] Gardner, Christopher, Alexandre Kiazand, et al, March 2007, JAMA, Comparison of the Atkins, Zone, Ornish,

and LEARN Diets for Change in Weight and Related Risk Factors Among Overweight Premenopausal Women

[18] The LEARN isn’t a diet but rather based on lifestyle changes, and so data on calories were not collected. 

[19] Alhassan, S, S. Kim et al, 2007, JAMA, Dietary adherence and weight loss success among overweight women: results from the A TO Z weight loss study

[20]  Alhassan, S, S. Kim et al, 2007, JAMA, Dietary adherence and weight loss success among overweight women: results from the A TO Z weight loss study

[21] Moyer, Melinda Nov 2019, Scientific American, Why almost everything Dean Ornish says about nutrition is wrong. The  two imbedded links http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3280017/ http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa055317

[22] The video by What I’ve Learned shows the cover of the article and the reference page with its date, but just the quote of Williams in very large print and 2 food pictures below.  I could not find after over 30 minutes the article using Google.scholar and  Medline.  

[23] This is a generalization which I find applicable in my own case, but younger, fit, and overweight dieters probably have significantly different experience.  I have not found studies done on the keto flu.

[24] Proteins are filling, and when measured by the net production of ATP, the 6 calories form a calorimeter is inaccurate. It is about 2.5 calories.   Therefore, the higher protein version of the original Atkins diet is superior and it has a higher compliance. 

[25] The same would apply to statins, they should be taken at night slow release low does.  There are benefits for niacin, which has many bio-functions, including lowering the mortality rate long term, but for statins it is net harm. 

[26]  Paoli, Antonio, Antonio Blanco et al, July 2015, The ketogenic diet and sports, a possible marriage?

[27] An inflammation of the gastrointestinal track (stomach and small intestine), for which I prefer the older usage of it to include the large intestines and to blanket the various inflammatory bowel conditions such as Crohn’s, dirverticulitis, and others.  Naming a condition on symptom has a low rate of confirmation, and often the testing falls well short of high percentage confirmation of diagnosis.   Gastroenteritis is a major cause of death mainly in children of the 3rd world, about 700,00 yearly under the age of 5.  About half of cases are in adults, with increased risk because of poor sanitation, food handling, elderly, and among those on a PPIs or polypharmacy.  If the condition persists over 3 weeks, I would take an enema and a strong laxative to flush the system out and hopeful permit the normal bacterial flora to replace the pockets toxin secreting bacteria or protozoa, or if invasive pathogen to have those destroyed by the immune system.   Fasting can starve the pathogenic colony as to a ketogenic diet without vegetables. Stressing the colony can help the immune system.  If these fail, the fecal enema has a high cure rate.  Unfortunately, the money interest has continued their war against this drug free alternative, and through guidelines have made this alternative unattractive to licensed care givers.        

[28] Dashti, Hussein, Mathew Thazhumpal, et al Fall 2004, Long-term effects of a ketogenic diet in obese patients



6. How bariatric surgery causes permanent weight loss:  Studies on the hormonal changes following bariatric surgery is a window on why some avoid the restoration of weight.  Another study showed that the increased fat was associated with t2d, and that following it “drastically decreased.”[1]  This confirms the work of Roy Taylor and team at Newcastle University of the increase in pancreatic fat as causal for t2d.[2]  Bariatric surgery, causes both a major reduction in weight and it cures those most with t2d within 2 months, before major weight loss (also covered in 6:4. 6).  I have found just three long-term follow up of bariatric surgery and a significant percentage keep their weight off and many of the diabetics are off their drugs.  The results are superior for the Swedish study.  The 2 studies have a control group who weren’t operated on.  (A 3rd study will be covered below these two).  These studies have mortality figures and from them we must assume an improvement in quality of life over the control group.  In the 10.9 year follow up of the Swedish study following 2010 with surgery and 2037 without surgery, there was about a 25% increased survival with surgery, and at the 10.9 years a 19% reduction in weight. [3]  Interestingly, of the deaths, there were 25 from MI in the control group and 13 in the surgery; but for cancer the unexpected 47 and 29 respectively.[4]  See 2 paragraphs below for my solution to the anomaly.


In the study published in the NEJM, Sept 2017, which had a 12-year follow up, there were 3 groups of severely obese, bariatric surgery for which 418 had the Roux-en-Y bypass, second group of 417 who sought surgery but for lack of insurance didn’t have surgery, and 321 who didn’t seek surgery.  During the 12-year follow-up 35% of the second group and 12% of the third had surgery. At 12 years for the 3 groups the adjust weight loss was 35 kg, 3 kg,[5] and 0 kg respectively (these latter 2 groups included the 35% and 12% who subsequent to baseline had bariatric surgery).  “Among the surgery group who had type 2 diabetes at baseline, type 2 diabetes remitted in 66 of 88 patients (75%) at 2 years, in 54 of 87 patients (62%) at 6 years and in 43 of 84 patients (51%) at 12 years” [6].  Weight loss was, 45 kg, 36 kg, and 35 kg at 2, 6 and 12 years; thus a net 10 kg gained at 12 years, a 22% regain.  Thus compared to other studies using CER, the difference is like night and day.  It seems like the hormonal changes that cured t2d also occurred in those who weren’t diabetic.  This raises the question of what hormonal changes relevant to resting the WRS occurred Roux-en-Y surgery group (#12).     


The drop in the number of patients in the follow-up of the surgery group was because of suicide, “5 patients of the gastric-bypass group died by suicide” Supra. None of the other 2 groups who didn’t have surgery committed suicide.  Note, 2 of the 2nd group who had the surgery committed suicide.  The author goes on to say that the suicide and self-harm “have been shown by previous studies” (supra). 


Unlike the author, who probably isn’t aware of the association of neuroleptic drugs with self-harm, I hold that it is the cause (4:5).  Those who undergone surgery are more likely to be given neuroleptic drugs (drugs that cause drowsiness other than opioids) and this is strongly associated with suicide, weight gain, and polypharmacy.    Those who had the operation are likely to be put on a sedative in the hospital and continued thereafter. Neuroleptics are a gate way drug inhibiting cognitive function and thereby increasing their reliance up their pill-pushing physicians.  Confirmation of my hypothesis on neuroleptic drugs as slow poison and a strong association with polypharmacy will require the opening of the data banks.


The Swedish study for which the cancer rate increased from 29 without surgery to 47 with surgery.  The increase in cancer I hold would follow from polypharmacy, especially the reduction in metabolism caused by neuroleptic drugs.  The US study didn’t track deaths from cancer.  Like with statins and dementia, pharma funds studies that deflect this obvious consequence by pharma’s studies finding a reduction.  We won’t know the numbers of deaths associated with drugs until the data banks are open for real world population studies. 


As for the mechanism for weight loss, the Roux-en-Y is very significantly better than the gastric band (#8) for its curing t2d.  BMI at 2 years was 29.7 compared to 36.3 for the band.  The hormonal cause was measured:  


Likewise, leptin levels were lower in the patients who underwent Roux-en-Y (P = .003), and levels correlated with weight loss, loss of fat mass, insulin levels, and Homeostasis Model of Assessment 2. Adiponectin correlated with insulin levels and Homeostasis Model of Assessment 2 (r = −0.653, P = .04 and r = −0.674, P = .032, respectively) in the patients who underwent Roux-en-Y at 24 months.[7]


However, with insurance companies deciding the treatment, the much less expensive gastric band is the standard or similar less invasive treatment dominates.[8]  Dollars before patients. 


Others studies support the conclusion that biliopancreatic diversion group has the best result.  In a 2012 study 75% with gastric-bypass and 95% with biliopancreatic diversion at 2 years were still in remission, and as expected a lower glycated hemoglobin level, 7.69 for the standard treatment gastric bypass group compared to 4.95 for the biliopancreatic group.[9] This clearly is a sign of regulatory hormonal changes (#12)


It has been proposed by Jason Fung and others that a type of fasting occurs following surgery, when the person is fed intravenously a low calorie infusion.  Fung et al hold during this period there is significant improvement in the diabetic patients.  This improvement occurs before significant weight loss, which is pharma’s explanation.  Fasting has been proposed by Jason Fung and others.  Through the extended fast it has been proposed that the fat in the excess lipid droplets in liver and pancreas have been metabolized, ant this changes results in a reversal of IR and restoring the WRS, and with that a major improvement in homeostasis.  More studies are needed to confirm these changes, thus showing what is causing the reversal of IR.   Something has happened to avoid the yo-yo diet, something that distinguishes them from the biggest losers that has caused a reversal of IR.   


 


7.  Going without food--fasting:  In a lecture by Dr. Jason Fung relates his 6-year old son’s reply to the question, how do you lose weight?  “Simply, don’t eat!”  There are two well established ways to lose weight, one is to turn up the daily rate of fat metabolism by lowering glucose metabolism, the other is by fasting, which of course turns up fat metabolism.  Both have many variations as to methods.  Since the two are complimentary, it would seem that the combination of both is superior to just one of them; and it is!  Now to resolve, what fasting type is best for one’s situation?


Medicinal fasting, historical background:  Before there was bariatric surgery, water fasting was the most successful treatment for the morbidly obese and obese.  The patient was monitored in a metabolic ward of a hospital, or as an out patients.  For most, health issues were minor, because like other mammals we have evolved to go long periods without food.  A normal weight male during starvation can go over 4 weeks before metabolizing muscle during starvation—autophagy of skin and adipose tissue supplies needed amino acids for autophagy.  The fit, thin male is about 13% fat, while the fit woman is about 23%.  At about 7% for men the body adds from fat metabolism to amino acids from muscles to also contribute to the ATP production.  A normal weight (thin) woman has near twice the store fat and takes longer before they metabolize muscle.  Biological like other mammals we are designed to survive prolonged food shortages—most common being underfed.  Since being underfed would include some carbs, the adaptations would be different, one of which is hunger being greater.  However, when the stored fat is quite low (~ 7%) the body switches into another phase to conserve fat through diminished ATP for movement, and to metabolize muscle so as to conserve fat.  Note fat is essential for building cell membranes for repair and replacement, thus the reserve is mainly for that purpose and as a building block for other bioactive molecules.      


PHASES OF STARVATION In the transition from the fed to the fasted state, a sequence of metabolic alterations occurs, listed as follows with their approximate duration: 1) Gastrointestinal absorption of substrate 1-6 hours 2) Glycogenolysis 1-2 days 3) Gluconeogenesis first week 4) Ketosis 3-4 days onward 5) Diminishing gluconeogenesis and increasing cerebral ketone consumption second week onward/[10]


          Five biological changes occur during starvation; they were identified in the 1970s George Cahill Senior, Harvard Professor.  In the earlier stages there is an increase the level of the catechol amines and human growth hormone (HGH) which in turn stimulates IGF-1.  IGF-1 stimulates serum glucose and FFAs.  The net result from the catechol amines and maintenance of the energy molecules more energy and mental alertness—a survival advantage.  Later stages operate to produce glucose for erythrocytes[11].  This is at the reason why those who try alternate fasting and extended water fasting report that they feel fine.  Moreover, measurements of leptin show that as meals are missed its secretion declines and thereby the hunger. 


          Fasting has been used to starve cancer, because all cancers have defective mitochondria; defective because apoptosis is initiated by the MTD, and disabled MTD by past this mechanism for dismantling significantly abnormal cells, the Warburg effect (3:3, 2).  Three of my friends through extended water fast were cured of their cancers.[12] 


          There are a number of variation as to what counts as a fast.  For the sake of discussion, and consistent with the journal literature, I adhere to the standard of 600 calories a day for men and 500 for women, which has been used for over a century, more calories will be labeled as CER.[13] Currently, Dr. Michael Mosely has made that fast popular with his best-seller books.[14]  Whether the water fast is superior when used for weight loss and for t2d, I cannot say; there are reasons for both. 


Intermittent fasting:  this consists of going from three meals a day to one are two.  Just missing one meal in a study show an average reduction in calories of over 500 per day.  On top of that the duration of fat metabolism increase.  Building upon that snacks should be low in total digestible carbs, so as not to shut down fat metabolism and autophagy.  Meals too should be low in carbs.  I skip breakfast since 2014 6 days a week.  I find it easy, and since I am not on a weight loss program, I could do better at least twice a week by skipping dinner.  I also a couple of day a month do a 22 hour fast, as I am in the medical library, and on those days I take the snacks out of the car.  Turning up autophagy is healthy, thus everyone would benefit from intermittent fasting who has been on the western diet. 


          Key points, assuming intermittent fasting is for weight loss and thus better health.  skip one meal a day is a good starting point, which can be extended.  Low carbs improve   the results.  Find a sustainable pattern. 


Alternate day fasting:  This is the next step up and should be used if the progress slows or stops with intermittent fasting. It is simple, made easier once adjust to the intermittent fasting, to switch to alternate day fasting.  Again by keeping the carbs to under 25% of calories on non-fasting day the results improve. 


As mentioned before, Michael Mosley’s 5:2 diet has been tried with success by millions, and his book was on the a #1 best seller on the international non-fiction list. On the fasting days, calories are limited to 500 for women and 600 for men.  There are many variations to this diet, many health benefits.       


Extended water fasting, this has the most healthful consequence, and one I do at least once a year for 5 to 6 days.  Since I am at the normal weight I go strict ketogenic with about 500 calories a day from butter and cheese.  I do this because at the age of 76 (2019), I have what runners call hitting the wall.  This hitting the wall didn’t occur until about the age of 70.  It is an extreme lack of energy, for example, walking slow around the block or 20 minutes of house cleaning is followed by exhaustion lasting several hours. Sometimes it occurs without physical activity and there is a prior warning at least proceeding it by a half hour that I need to eat and it must include some carbohydrates. This might not occur for younger and heavier with extended water fasting.    


As repeatedly stated, the hormonal processes are what causes weight gain, and the processes must be reversed for long-term weight loss:  the WRS establishes the level of fat; it must be reset.  Adipose tissue functions not only as an important buffer for fatty acids but also as a highly active secretory organ, capable of influencing whole-body physiology through the production of an array of bioactive Adipokines.” [15]  The role of insulin in weight gain is beyond questioning both at the laboratory level and observational level.  The success of fasting is beyond questioning, and the combination of high fat thus low carb diet with fasting entails the Randle cycle stays in the fat metabolizing setting.  There is a lack of quality long-term studies of low carbs, of fasting, and the combination of the two.  Studies are need which measure, the effects on liver metabolism, insulin and leptin levels, CER diets, and whatever else would elucidate the processes.


Fasting also turns up autophagy and thus goes far beyond curing t2d: 


There is large empirical and observational evidence that medically supervised modified fasting (fasting cure, 200-500 kcal nutritional intake per day) with periods of 7-21 days is efficacious in the treatment of rheumatic diseases, chronic pain syndromes, hypertension, and metabolic syndrome. The beneficial effects of fasting followed by vegetarian diet in rheumatoid arthritis are confirmed by randomized controlled trials. Further beneficial effects of fasting are supported by observational data and abundant evidence from experimental research which found caloric restriction and intermittent fasting being associated with deceleration or prevention of most chronic degenerative and chronic inflammatory diseases. Intermittent fasting may also be useful as an accompanying treatment during chemotherapy of cancer. . . . Various identified mechanisms of fasting point to its potential health-promoting effects, e.g., fasting-induced neuroendocrine activation and hormetic stress response, increased production of neurotrophic factors, reduced mitochondrial oxidative stress, general decrease of signals associated with aging, and promotion of autophagy.[16]


          Fasting is easier than caloric restriction.  It is easier to stay out of the kitchen, to be away from food, than to be around it and limit the portions:


Persistent hunger and irritability noted in non-obese men and women in earlier IER trials, where food was completely restricted on alternate days, suggest that some individuals are unlikely to be able to comply for extended periods of time.  Compliance with IER [intermittent fasting] protocols which allow some intake on restricted days have been promisingly high. . .  Findings from rodent trials suggest that IER (50-100% ER/alternate days) is capable of modulating adipose physiology, independently of changes to fat-mass. [17] [IER alternate days is alternate day fasting, ER energy restriction, the 50-100% is the amount of restriction of rat chow on fasting days.]


The first part above is evidence that intermittent fasting compliance is higher than CER. This is consistent with my observation The second section quoted above states that through IER (alternate day fasting) the adipose tissue hormones don’t kick in, in particular leptin, to cause increased hunger and lower metabolism, a metabolic response to preserve adipose tissue and restore its fat to prior level.[18]  Thus alternate day fasting or the short intermittent version are a way to lose weight, cure or manage without drugs t2d, and avoid the at 2 months reduction in metabolism and increase in appetite caused by leptin.


          The benefit of IER is improved insulin response.  The article points out that with moderate to high carb diet does the glucose level rise to abnormal levels, and thus with low carbs the production of insulin is sufficient to keep the serum glucose at a normal level.  Clearly the low carb diet is the way to manage t2d.


Hepatic IR ensues, increasing endogenous glucose production, hence elevating plasma glucose levels and stimulating further insulin secretion.  Within pancreatic β cells, excessive lipid deposition causes the metabolic inhibition of postprandial insulin secretion which, above an individual threshold, will herald the onset of hyperglycaemia.  Within pancreatic β cells, excessive lipid deposition causes the metabolic inhibition of postprandial insulin secretion which, above an individual threshold, will herald the onset of hyperglycaemia.[19]


It isn’t rocket science that the low carb diet is the way to keep serum glucose within the normal level and thus not need drugs for managing it, and IER is the most effective of the many types of diet for significant weight loss. 


          This brings back to what I would do if my BMI was above 30.  I would do a long-term water fast, and if that proved difficult, I would include small snack low in carbs and high in protein, and if I feel I need more energy add butter.  I would add to that male hormone replacement, and for women estradiol with progesterone for seniors (6:2) because of their role in lipodystrophy and metabolism.  I would also take three-325 uncoated aspirin[20] because it lowers blood glucose and has been used in very high dose to cure t2d (see http://healthfully.org/rc/id3.html under diabetes heading). The object is to reverse insulin resistance and improve quality of life.  


For lower risk for CAWD:  Risks for an assortment of conditions has in the literature been shown to be lowered by extended fasting: 


There is large empirical and observational evidence that medically supervised modified fasting (fasting cure, 200-500 kcal nutritional intake per day) with periods of 7-21 days is efficacious in the treatment of rheumatic diseases, chronic pain syndromes, hypertension, and metabolic syndrome. . . . Further beneficial effects of fasting are supported by observational data and abundant evidence from experimental research which found caloric restriction and intermittent fasting being associated with deceleration or prevention of most chronic degenerative and chronic inflammatory diseases.  . . . Various identified mechanisms of fasting point to its potential health-promoting effects, e.g., fasting-induced neuroendocrine activation and hormetic stress response, increased production of neurotrophic factors, reduced mitochondrial oxidative stress, general decrease of signals associated with aging, and promotion of autophagy.[21]


Autophagy is what reverses IR and t2d by metabolizing lipid droplets that cause pancreatic inflammation and its beta cell dysfunction.  Autophagy selective follow the surgery promotes the metabolism of pancreatic lipid droplets and hepatocytes droplets. 


 


8. Extended water fast, Angus Barbieri:


https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/57/Angus_Barbieri.jpg/220px-Angus_Barbieri.jpg


An example carefully tracked by physicians and in the Guinness Book of Records is Angus Barbieri, a 456 lbs. record water fast. Angus is Scotsman from Tayport.  “Initially there was no intention of making his fast a protracted one, but since he adapted so well and was eager to reach his “ideal” weight, his fast was continued into what is presently the longest recorded fast (Guinness Book of Records, 1971).” [22]  Starting in June 1965, at the age of 27, he went on a medically supervised water fast lasting 382 days and lost 276 lbs. to obtain his goal of 180 lbs.  He consumed only vitamins (Paladac), vitamin C, yeast, electrolytes, and zero-calorie beverages.  Initially he was treated in the hospital, “but for the greater part of the time he was allowed home, attending regularly as an out-patient for check-up” (supra).


Monitoring for health reason would reveal any significant consumption of food.  “Twenty-four hour urine collections were made periodically throughout the fast.  His mean urinary creatinine excretion was 1541 mg/24hrs, with a deviation of 25% from the average. . . there were 37-48 days between stools latterly.” (supra).  His fortnight blood test included tolbutamid (sulfonylurea drug), glucose tolerance, and glucagon tests, as tests for carbohydrate metabolism.  Tolbutamide was given 1 ½ hours after glucose infusion.  “Test for glucose tolerance showed unimpaired capacity for glucose uptake” [IR cured] (supra). His average blood glucose was 30 mg/dL (1.7 mmol/L),[23] which confirmed that he wasn’t eating carbs—as too his weight loss.  The low level of glucose is consistent with others studies of long-term water fasting.[24]  He was well below what causes hypoglycemia shock in diabetics 40 mg/dL, (2.2 mmol/L).  Hypoglycemia in diabetics is listed at 70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L).  The sudden drop of glucose of diabetics, without the 5 metabolic shits that occurs over a period of about 5 days, this is the reason for diabetic hypoglycemic shock.


The case study was published 7 years later.  He didn’t need an operation to remove the skin folds because autophagy metabolized the excess skin and adipocytes to supply the needed amino acids for autographic cellular repairs—the recycling of amino acids.  Only when fat stores become low, then the body starts metabolizing muscle—that occurs when fat drops below 7%.  On his examination at 7 years, Angus had gained only 16 pounds—much better than the contestants on The Biggest Losers show.[25]   Note: after an hour, I gave up on trying to find Angus’s cause of death at the age of 51 and weight at that age.  


Not all are so fortunate, and a friend of mine, a middle-age geriatric physician, had to undergo surgery to remove his folds.  I recall him power walking around the track holding the large flaps of skin with subcutaneous fat on each side against his body.  He lost nearly 150 pounds eating 1 meal a day for a year.  With the social support of his wife, a nurse, he kept the weight off, an indication that his insulin resistance was reversed and with a supportive social environment he did not at 5 years become obese again.   


 


9.  Amino acid and insulin:  It is widely circulated that certain amino acids raise inulin; the combination of essential amino acids raise insulin the most.  It is a topic I have been pondering over since 2015.  Why should insulin go up when amino acids increase in the blood?  I stopped nibble on cheese during my intermittent fast in the morning in 2016.  In 2018, I found an article which stated that it only happened when consuming proteins with carbs.  So I started again cheese nibbling.  Then in December of 2019 I searched insulin amino acids and fond that the glucose amino acid combo was wrong, that the essential amino acids (30 grams infusion) would cause for 1 hour an insulin spike significantly greater than any one of the amino acids.[26]  The spike of the 30 was similar to an infusion by glucose.  So why has nature given us an insulin spike for essential amino acids.


          Nature is very good at fine-tuning processes on a cellular-molecular level.  In general, the more significant for survival and reproduction the finer the adjustment are and the more complex the processes.  For example the adipokines (also known as adipocytokines) are cell signaling proteins secreted by the adipose tissue:  The first adipokine to be discovered was leptin in 1994.[1] Since that time, hundreds of adipokines have been discovered.”[27]  I bring adipokine to give an idea of the complexity of the homeostasis systems and by extension that it is very likely there is a system that responds to amino acids and doesn’t lower blood glucose is both possible and likely. 


That the essential entails stimulate insulin and doesn’t respond to the non-essential amino acids which are synthesized as needed, this suggests that the insulin has another function besides stimulating glycogen synthesis, the release of glucose by the liver, and the uptake by cells of glucose.  Insulin also stimulates the product and release of two androgens, IGF1 and IGF-2—insulin like growth factors.  The insulin rise is because of the need to utilize the amino acids which can’t be stored.  The growth factors stimulate skeletal muscle and other targeted tissues growth.  Thus insulin is signalling for the synthesis of proteins as needed.  I suspect that this doesn’t throw the Randle cycle into glucose metabolism unless there is significant amount of carbs—not a common occurrence among paleo peoples who tended to eat only one type of food at a meal.  The modest drop in serum FFA during the insulin spike caused by amino acids suggest that fat metabolism continues and their conversion into triglycerides. 


Another piece of the puzzle is the in mammals glutamine is part of the mTOR, regulation system and this turns on autophagy by down regulation of mTOR.[28]  Liver autophagy not only promotes both the anabolism and catabolism of the amino acids during fasting, but also the regulation of blood glucose.[29]  Whatever the details the net purpose of autophagy and insulin is to increase survival in the natural environment. 


Unlike the affluent populations, paleo peoples didn’t make a ritual out of meals, but for special occasions.  They didn’t eat a balance meal, but rather often ate just one food.  Thus they would eat meat without starches, or starches such as taro without meat, or just nuts; etc.  Secondly scarcity of meat and other protein sources in some populations supports a set of thrifty genes for the construction of proteins, and such construction requires autophagy thus the role of insulin is different when the carbs are low in a high protein meal.


As for my diet, I am still doing the intermittent fast, and since I am at my ideal weight, I am not on a weight reduction program.  The last time I was in 2003, when after 2 weeks with relatives, I put on 15 pounds, which I promptly took off when returning to California.  Since then with the supplement of testosterone high dose from a compounding pharmacy, I have not attempted to lose weight.  I naturally stay within the around 160 lbs.  The WCS is working as designed.  Prior to that since I was 27, I would watch my weight, and when it creeped up 6 pounds I would cut back on portions.  I believe that the testosterone makes a major difference, and that I was on two 325 mgs of aspirin daily—aspirin lowers serum glucose. 


With my current diet my snacks are small portions of cheese, about 8 grams with about 12 grams of butter, or I eat bell pepper with homemade Russian dressing.  Small portions low in carbs keeps my insulin low and I stay in mainly the fat metabolizing mode.  I have come to believe based on a number of trials with alternate day fasting and calories up to 500 per day women and 600 men that the results aren’t compromised and the compliance is significant.[30] The complexity has promotes efficiency,[31] thus I presume on indirect evidence that proteins with fats in moderate amounts do not overturn the apple cart, that they are an ideal snack in addition or with leafy vegetables.   


Dietary examples support this conclusion that proteins don’t cause fat storage.  The success of the high protein low carb diets stands as evidence.  The Banting diet[32] and that of Atkins have  both done better than the low carb CER diets. 


I mention this about proteins so that those who wish to try out intermittent fasting, high fat diet or alternate day fasting will have some tips by one who is strong in nutritional science and practical experience. The evidence supporting both long-term water fasting, and also low carb fasting comes from many directions. If your body sends a strong message to eat, try as I do, the protein saturated fat snacks.  Remember that are appetite is set up to promote survival as long as it is properly functioning as it does for the LSPs.   


Wasting t1d prior insulin days:  given what has been said of the role of insulin as to its regulatory function for the insulin like growth factors.


 


10.  A modern update on diet:  What diet depends upon one’s health, for which I have broken down into 5 diets depending on situation, at http://healthfully.org/rh/id8.html.  Empower the rational module of the brain by watching the YouTube videos listed at http://healthfully.org/rh/id7.html under categories 1, 2 and 3—knowledge effects behavior.  If I was diabetic.  We are a social animal, thus for most people it is necessary to get the support of the significant other.  Having them watch the videos is a start.  Work on them to be supportive by using condition techniques of reward and withholding rewards. It is hard to diet when the other half is an obstacle. 


          If I was overweight or worse, I would start with low sugar and intermittent fasting while gradually lowering carbs and increasing saturated fats.  I wouldn’t count calories.  When not hungry skip a second meal.  Non-carb snacks help.  I snack on cheese with a big wad of butter (zero carbs), sometimes it is salted nuts with butter.  Sex hormones (6:2) play an important role.  I am 76 as of 6/19, have been on this diet since 2014 with intermittent fasting since 2014 and low sugar.  Lower carbs was introduced in 2016.   However, I have always been of normal weight so I don’t try to lose more weight.  I haven’t watched my weight since I started testosterone replacement in 2003. 


If I had t2d I would go on a very low carb, high fat diet with extended water fasting to metabolize the lipid droplets in the liver and pancreas.  Once restoring weight and glucose metabolism to normal, I would stay on a high fat diet with intermittent fasting (#5).  I would once ideal weight increase carbs to about what is craved.  I currently get about 20% of ATP from carbs 70% from fats and 10% from excess amino acid.  Let the body be the guide, unless the leptin system is causing weight gain.  Intermittent fasting might be sufficient, otherwise continue with alternate day fasting and lowering carbs. There would be no need to say no to the drugs? 


Water fasting or if too difficult extremely low net carbs[33] is a key part of the cure.  The fast increases autophagy with a major increase in mitophagy.  The rate of replacement of the MTD in the liver peaks at 1.25 days; the control at 1.85 days, and there is nearly zero overlap of the 2 bell curves.[34]  The article goes on to warn that using fasting glucose and BA1c are inferior to that of “changes in circulating insulin concentration, fasting (hepatic) insulin sensitivity, and glucose uptake/clearance. ..”[35] The mitophagy increase is the key part of what gives the superior results.  Moreover, in this seminal review article it noted with references to 6 articles that “Compliance with IER [intermittent fasting] protocols which allow some intake on restricted days have been promisingly high” (supra).  The review article supports both dietary management of t2d but also through fasting with low carb its cure. 


 


11. Ketogenic diet


 


Figure 1


 


          Much of what has been said about multiple day water fasting applies to the ketogenic diet in that both, both metabolize fat producing ketone bodies, both turn up autophagy, both cause significant weight loss, both improve insulin sensitivity, and both have been shown to treat or reduce the risk of a number of conditi  Much of what has been said about the salubrious effects of fasting can be said of a ketogenic diet.


D-beta-hydroxybutyrate, the principal "ketone" body in starving man, displaces glucose as the predominating fuel for brain, decreasing the need for glucose synthesis in liver (and kidney) and accordingly spares its precursor, muscle-derived amino acids. Thus normal 70 kg. man survives 2-3 months of starvation instead of several weeks, and obese man many months to over a year. Without this metabolic adaptation, H. sapiens could not have evolved such a large brain. Recent studies have shown that D-beta-hydroxybutyrate, the principal "ketone", is not just a fuel, but a "superfuel" more efficiently producing ATP energy than glucose or fatty acid. In a perfused rat heart preparation, it increased contractility and decreased oxygen consumption. It has also protected neuronal cells in tissue culture against exposure to toxins associated with Alzheimer's or Parkinson's. . . . Efforts are underway to prepare esters of beta-hydroxybutyrate which can be taken orally or parenterally to study its potential therapeutic applications.[36]


Beta-hydroxybutyrate stimulates neurotropic factors, for which there is evidence that it slows the progression of Alzheimer’s disease, and has been used to reduce to block epileptic seizures since 1920, and guidelines recommended for intractable cases for children, after the sedatives have proven unsatisfactory—thankyou pharma for the limits.  In a retrospective chart review of patients who had been on the diet for 6 years, 24 out of 28 patients had experienced more than a 90% reduction in seizures.” [37]  As an adult which would you do if having frequent seizures.  One of my neighbors is constantly low (not high) from the same treatment for intractable migraines.  Yes, there is evidence in support of treating migraines with a ketogenic diet—and also for dementia. 


 


Why carbohydrates are fattening unlike fats:  Insulin through the overstuffing of cells with glucose causes two things that promote weight gain when the WRS points to the right.  One is by synthesis of fats, the other by conversion of fatty acids into the storage from of triglycerides by the addition of glycerol. 


Acetyl-CoA-2D colored.svg                   Brenztraubensäure.svg


                             Acetyl–CoA                              Pyruvic acid--pyruvate is the base


Acetyl-CoA (acetyl coenzyme A) is a molecule that participates in many biochemical reactions of protein, carbohydrate and lipids metabolism. Its main function is to deliver the acetyl group to the Krebs cycle to be oxidized for energy production.  Two Acetyl-CoA through several steps gives rise to acetoacetate, beta-hydroxybutyrate and their break down product acetone, which are called ketone bodies.  They are mainly produced by the liver and released into the blood.  All cells with mitochondria (that includes all cells in the nervous system) can take up the ketone bodies.  Acetyl CoA can also be used in the cytosol to form fatty acids or converted to malonyl CoA for the synthesis of fatty acids.  Acetyl CoA can also enter the melavonate pathway which makes several essential compounds including cholesterol.   Acetyl is a substrate for flavonoids, polyketides, steroids, phospholipids, and on and on. 


Pyruvic acid is made from glucose and enters the Krebs cycle when oxygen is present; when not it is metabolized in the cytosol in a process called fermentation.


A more detailed explanation of the synthesis of fats from carbohydrates:  when insulin is high due to blood glucose, the cells become stuffed with glucose.  When there is sufficient ATP a feedback system causes the use the citrate (produced by the condensation of acetyl CoA with oxaloacetate) in the Krebs cycle.  This turns off the production of ATP temporarily.  When the level of ATP is sufficient the acetyl CoA is carried across the inner mitochondrial membrane into the cytosol.  In humans, fatty acids are formed from carbohydrates predominantly in the liver and adipose tissue, as well as in the mammary glands during lactation.  The pyruvate (pyruvic acid) produced by glycolysis is an important intermediary in the conversion of carbohydrates into fatty acids and cholesterol.


Most of the acetyl-CoA which is converted into fatty acids is derived from carbohydrates via the glycolytic pathway. 


 


12. A listing of what is best for dieting for weight loss, managing diabetes, and lowering risk for CAWD (in approximate order of importance):


SOCIAL FACTORS:  building the will power to behave differently


  1.  Enlist support of roommate, significant other, friends, family, and others

  2. Watch daily the documentary and lectures at http://healthfully.org//rh/id7.html

    ON DIETING:


  1. Intermittent fasting

  2. Extended low carb fasting

  3. Alternate day fasting[38]

  4. Very low digestible carb snacks[39]

  5. Ratio of fats 75% to carbs 25% in calories (not counting proteins)

  6. Hormone replacement after the age of 60 men 50 women (6:2)

  7. On non-fasting days no digestible carbs 3 hours before going to sleep

  8. Strenuous work or exercise including weight training—especially if on HRT




[1] Gaborit, B, I Abdesselam, et al, July 2014, Ectopic fat storage in the pancreas using 1H-MRS: importance of diabetic status and modulation with bariatric surgery-induced weight loss

[2] Knop, Flip, Roy Taylor, August 2013, Mechanism of Metabolic Advantages After Bariatric Surgery:  It’s all gastrointestinal factors versus it’s all food restriction.  Prof. Roy Taylor has several lectures on YouTube on this topic.

[3] Sjostrom, Lars, Kristina Narbo, et al Aug 2007, Effects of Bariatric Surgery on Mortality in Swedish Obese Subjects, FULL, while suicides are not listed, sudden deaths are 20 vs 14 for the non-surgery.  This greater sudden death rate probably reflects the reluctance in reporting suicide, and the requirement for clear evidence that it was suicide as cause of death.    

[4] Unexpected because there is a strong association of cancer with obesity, thus the surgery group should have had less caners.

[5] Many of them had the surgery years later, and many would have had a type surgery which reduces the size of the stomach, for which the evidence on benefits are well below that of the Roux-en-Y type of bypass. 

[6] Adams, Ted, Lance Davidson, et al, Sept 2017, Gastric Bypass Surgery for Severe Obesity: 12-Year Outcomes.  There were 7 deaths by suicide (5 in the surgery group and 2 in non-surgery group 1); both suicide deaths in non-surgery group 1 occurred after the patients had undergone bariatric surgery.”

[7] Trakntenbroit, Michael, Joshua Leichman, et al May 2009, Body Weight, Insulin Resistance, and Serum Adipokine Levels 2 Years after 2 Types of Bariatric Surgery.  In another study at 12 months the BMI was also 29 for the Reux-en-Y bypass, Polyzogopoulou, Eftihia, Fotios Kalfarentzos, et al, May 2003, Restoration of Euglycemia and Normal Acute Insulin Response to Glucose in Obese Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Following Bariatric Surgery, and their t2d was cured at 2 months. 

[8] Pareek, Manan, Philip Schauer, et al Feb 2918, Metabolic surgery:  weight loss, diabetes and beyond

[9] Mingrone, Geltrude, Simona Panunzi, et al April, 2002, Bariatric Surgery versus Conventional Medical Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes

[10] Cahill Georg F Jr., May 1977, Physiology of acute starvation in man

[11] I have failed to find evidence that certain cells in the brain need glucose, since the measurement aren’t sufficiently selective to exclude erythrocyte glucose metabolism. 

[12] All cells require a supply of ATP, the more metabolically active the more ATP.  In most the MTD have been sufficiently disable so that dep[end totally on the cytosol for the production of ATP through a process called fermentation, fermentation of glucose.  A diet lack glucose will starve the cell, since the alternate glutamate isn’t in sufficient amount to yield enough ATP for cancer cell maintenance.  Ethics committees for approving clinical trials have block the clinical trials using just water fasting, or they require chemotherapy first.  But the fully functional immune system is need to destroy cancerous cell, and chemo very significantly weakens the immune system.  

[13] Tsukahara, Satooru, Makoto Ohno, et al, 1988, (book), Diet and Obesity p. 205-227, Dieting using a very low calorie diet

[14] Unfortunately, he doesn’t limit carbs for the obese, but does for diabetic and prediabetic, and recommends a high fat diet to replace the carbohydrates, The 8-week blood sugar diet:  how to beat diabetes fast (and stay off medication) P 67-9 & elsewhere. 

[15] Antoni, Rona, Kelly Johnston, et al, March 2014, The Effects of Intermittent Energy Restriction on Indices of Cardiometabolic Health

[16] Michalsen A, C Li, Dec 2013, Fasting Therapy for Treating and Preventing Disease - Current State of Evidence

[17] Antoni, Rona, Kelly Johnston, et al, March 2014, The Effects of Intermittent Energy Restriction on Indices of Cardiometabolic Health

[18] Antoni, Rona, Kelly Johnston, et al, March 2014, The Effects of Intermittent Energy Restriction on Indices of Cardiometabolic Health

[19] Antoni, Rona, Kelly Johnston, et al, March 2014, The Effects of Intermittent Energy Restriction on Indices of Cardiometabolic Health

[20] The coated aspirin takes 5 hours on an empty stomach and 8 hours on a full stomach to reach peak blood level, and total aspirin absorbed is one half that of the uncoated aspirin—part of bad pharma’s assault upon aspirin. 

[21] Michalsen A, C Li, Dec 2013, Fasting Therapy for Treating and Preventing Disease - Current State of Evidence.  Last 3 words shouldn’t be promotion of autophagy bur rather one facet, promotion of apoptosis.

[22] A case study was published 7 years later, Stewart, William, Laura Fleming, March 1973, Features of a successful therapeutic fast of 382 days' duration

[23] This level is well below that which causes symptomatic hypoglycemia and death.  During extended fasting the liver adjusts to the lack of food by producing glucose, and other adjustments occur.  Medical supervised water fasting was used to reverse obesity prior to bariatric surgery.   Drenick, Ernst, Marion, Swendseid, et al Jan, 1964, Prolonged Starvation as Treatment for Severe Obesity  

[24] The diabetic coma from hypoglycemia is caused by a failure of the body to make metabolic adjustments to the rapid change in serum glucose.  There are 5 metabolic switches that occur with extended water fasting. 

[25] See Jason Fung, The complete guide to fasting, 2016, P 104-106, who relied upon the New York Time’s article mostly, which was based upon an article in Obesity, Fothergill, Erin, Juen Guo, et al, May 2016, Persistent metabolic adaptation 6 years after “The Biggest Loser” competition. 

[26] Floyd, John, Stefan Fajans, et al, sept 1966, Stimulation of insulin secretion by amino acids

[27] Wiki Adipokine Jan 2020

[28] Nicklin, Paul, Philip Bergman and 15 others, Feb 2009, Bidirectional Transport of Amino Acids Regulates mTOR and Autophagy

[29] Ezaki, Junji, Naomi Matsumoto, et al, Autophagy Vol. 7, 2011, Liver autophagy contributes to the maintenance of blood glucose and amino acid levels

[30] One well received case is that of Michael Mosley, whose 5- 2 diet book made it to the best seller list:  The 8-week blood sugar diet:  how to beat diabetes fast (and sty off medications and The fast die t#1 New York Times Bestseller.  His documentary and interviews on YouTube are very good. 

[31] Patti, ME, Brambilla, et al, April 1998, Bidirectional modulation of insulin action by amino acids

[32] William Banting, Letter on Corpulence (1869) which is still in print a 150 years later.

[33] Net carbs are total carbs minus the fiber.  A tern used by the group of professors that runs the New Atkins diet. 

[34]  Antoni, Rona, Kelly Johnston, et al, March 2014, The Effects of Intermittent Energy Restriction on Indices of Cardiometabolic Health  https://wol-prod-cdn.literatumonline.com/cms/attachment/496dba0d-bac9-42ef-81c8-8bfc03fef479/acel_426_f2.gif

[35] Antoni, Rona, Kelly Johnston, et al, March 2014, The Effects of Intermittent Energy Restriction on Indices of Cardiometabolic Health

[36] [36]  Cahill, George Jr., Richard Veech, Trans American Climatol Association, 2003, Ketoacids? Good medicine? Beta-hydroxybutyrate is derived from short-chain fatty acids. GF Cahill (1927 to 2012) research director of the Joslin Diabetes Center from 1962 to 1978.  In 1970 he became a Harvard School of Medicine professor.   He was a leading researcher on metabolism, diabetes, fasting and related topics, number over 100 articles from 1958 to 1983, 25 years

[37] McArtney, Rowena, Alexancer Bailey, et al BMJ, 2017, What is a ketogenic diet and how does it affect the use of medicines?

[38] Both #s 2 & 3 a limited numbers of calories, 500 for elderly and women, 600 for men with very low carbs will not significantly tak the dieter out of fat metabolism through elevated insulin to cause conversion of free fatty acids to triglycerides or shut down autophagy

[39] This would consist of cheese, meets, fish, oils, green –leafy vegetables, nuts, in small portions so as not to significantly raise insulin and thereby shut down autophagy and causes the conversion of free fatty acids to triglycerides.  These types of snacks should be used to extend diet and make repeating of 1, 2, and 3 more likely.  


13.  A personal note on how I ate the western diet and escaped:  A number of socially driven behavior helped me.  First, my education and acceptance of Greek wisdom, which held that the highest pleasures are intellectual because of their duration and lack of negative consequences (if one had the spirit of the Greek philosopher, which among other things stressed public spirit and doing good).  I was a philosophy major with 2 years of graduate school.  Second, in 1974 on moving to California I notice that the fit and athletic were a happier lot of people.  So I socialized with them and took up volley ball and cycling.  That help me metabolize sufficient excess sugar.  Third prior to this, in 1969, I had as a policy watched my weight and took off promptly excess weight.  I had gained about 20 pounds in about 6 months while in graduate school, the University of Manitoba, philosophy, in 1969-1970.  Today I know that weight gain which automatically don’t result in a subsequent reduction in appetite, typically once the social environment which caused it has been removed, or weight is gained in the normal environment.  Mine was the latter case.  At the time and until recently I thought my metabolism had slowed down; no I had become insulin resistant.  If my metabolism did slow down, it was because of insulin resistance increasing leptin which caused a reduction in my metabolic rate.  I was gaining weight because of a weight regulator system that was malfunctioning because of insulin resistance, as explained in 3:4, 9.  Thereafter when I gained more than 5 pound, I cut back on calories.  This is important for if the weight remains on, the hormonal regulator system who is IR, that within 2 years the system will reset to the new weight.  If the system is working right, thus the person is not IR, then he will not need to diet because the system will reduce appetite.   Fourth, because of chronic back pain my doctor recommended in 1992 that I take 2.5 grams of enteric coated aspirin.[1]  Aspirin very significantly lowers blood glucose—neither of us knew that.  It also significantly lowers the risk of cancer by over 50% at the 325 mgs daily, along with the risk for atherosclerosis—two of the CAWD.  Even at 325 to 650 mgs per day it has a glucose lowering effect.  This help to limit, along with exercise and sport, the degree of insulin resistance.  Fifth, as mention in #8, I was aware of the importance of hormones by the 5th decade.  In 2002 at the age of 59, fearing regulations removing of DHEA from the market, I bought 250 mgs of DHEA.   I started taking under 20 mgs daily it sublingually, so as to bypass the liver which would metabolize nearly all of it on first pass from the venous portal vein.  Sixth, two-year later, at the age of 61, I was tested and had low testosterone, sufficiently low for my doctor to prescribe topical testosterone from a compounding pharmacy. 250 mgs daily in a lotion which yields about 25 mgs.  Testosterone through its androgen effect—and other way—lowers serum glucose, and I was a physical fitness addict.  The reduction in hormones with age is one of the contributing factors driving the continues weight gain we observe, must common by the 5th decade for women and 6th form men.  Their IR is progressing.  The combination of these is why I avoided the conditions associated with the western diet, though I was unaware of the hazard of the high sugar diet until 2013.  Now living in a gated senior community, I see a health disaster that bring a steady flow of inner tears.  I am by chance still running at the age of 76 over 60 miles a month, and the amount of weight I can lift is still the same, though my endurance while is about 1/3rd of when I was 50.  I certainly don’t have the mitochondrial wellness of the Kitavans nor their low risk for CAVD, but I am probably in the top 5% for my age group in the US.  Of course that don’t make me CAWD (bullet) proof like the Kitavans. 

          Another part of my good fortune was starting a medical website in 2004.  It has been the largest independent of industry tobacco science site on the internet. That site exposed me to the corruption worked by insurance, corporate clinics, and pharma, food manufacturers, tobacco[2] and the alcoholic beverage industry. 

These industries and our government makes use of the media through social conditioning to shape behavior.  The example of cigarettes (developed at  ???) illustrates the insidious effectiveness.  This too I missed, I’ve only owned a television for under 5 years, and in those years it usage was limited.  Secondly my education (11 ½ years was too much a gulf for me to enjoy in part because of education that made the mass manipulation of behavior And this made it easy to override the media generated social condition.  Profits before people, what I call tobacco ethics and tobacco science.  I had chosen to use a compounding pharmacy than to get 1/3rd the dose from pharma (comparing to Androgel).  The higher the dose the greater the greater the protection from fructation—a benefit I wasn’t aware of, though I was of the lowered risk for T2DM, see #15.  From 2004 I had been using the lotions from a compounding pharmacy.  In 2017 Medicare stopped covering drugs from compounding pharmacies.[3]  Now I was faced with the choice of paying or switching to a form offered by pharma.  Besides lower dose, chemicals in the patch was a concern.  The one offered in the formulary of Humana had 12 chemicals in a multi-layer patch.  Given the pattern of business, I doubted that the pharmaceutical company did honest testing or relied upon anything other than marketing science in their selection of chemical for their patch.  Their concern, given its complexity, was to get a patent of exclusivity, and Humana was the spread between billing Medicare at the average wholesale price and its cost.  Low dose and chemical cocktail decided the matter. 

          With my use of 325 to 650 mgs of aspirin since 1992, DHEA since 2002, and testosterone since 2004, I had lowered IR, and by lowering IR I was raising the level of IGF-1, and lowering the rate of fructation.  It wasn’t until 2014 that I reduced sugar consumption by 80%, and at the same time increased my ratio of fats (mainly saturated) to digestible carbohydrates to 4 to 1.   Prior to that my sugar consumption was near the US average of about 180 pounds yearly all sources (2:3), and by my 5th decade about 50 pounds under the national average—still well above a safe level for my age[4].  The WHO safe level is 30 lbm a year for men which equals 150 grams per day.[5]  This brings me back to the InCHIANTI Study, in that I had high DHEA and TTT which put me at the top of their 1st group by 2014.  Hopefully the autophagy has repaired 70 years of the western diet, including eliminating the MTD with significant damage to their mtDNA and replaced them with the best of my MTD. The repair process is measured in years and won’t give me numbers like those of the Kitavans and other LSPs (1:1).   

 

14.  Fixing the cause:  If we are to fix the problem, we must fix the cause, and this requires effective regulations of food content, advertisement, and pricing—making unhealthy food, like with cigarettes, more expensive.  We can’t change human behavior, we must change the environment, and thus must occur at the top.  We must blame the top for failing to promote the public weal.  The claim of service by government is a façade, the reality is that we have a corporatist state.  Only about 2014 had I stopped blaming the victim for obesity.  Our government must control the market place when it conflicts with the public weal.   



[1] Neither of us knew that the coating was designed to lower serum aspirin.  It takes according to a study 8 hours for peak level of aspirin in the blood, and total amount of absorbed aspirin is one half that of the uncoated which reach a peak within one hour.  More bad pharma wanting illness,3:5, 6.

[2] The blaming of cholesterol and saturated fats is another crime against billions of people:  that theory benefitted food manufacturers and pharma and got tobacco and ethanol off the hook for the ischemic events.  Under Nixon’s Republicans, there was a media orchestrated search for the cause of the increase in heart attacks. Though the science had already confirmed the role of tobacco and sugar along with refined carbs were the 2nd leading suspect, the powers blamed on the basis of tobacco science cholesterol and saturated fats, both of which are better than the carbs, sugar, and polyunsaturated fats whose stock went up.   Under our corporate system we have created a health disaster world-wide that has by percentages done more harm than any century of plagues and crop failures as to the world wide percentage of people harmed.  Historians, functioning as historians will write of the failure of science to serve mankind, and like the failure of social for political reasons, the same will be written of capitalism.  Or as Adam Smith wrote, “All for ourselves, nothing for anybody else, that is the rule maxim of the rulers of mankind,  

[3] When the media goes wild over a situation which could lead through regulations and profits for pharma, it is a pattern repeat, serving pharma before people.  The media serves their biggest advertise.

[4] I had near zero soda, very low in fruit juices and drinks, and very low in table sugar and syrups, average in ice cream, fruits, candies, and high in preserves.

[5] This is added sugar, a defect since for some people that get that amount from fruits and juices, and a molecule is a molecule.   Once for ounce coke and apple juice have the same amount of sugar.

Enter supporting content here

On how daily excessive fructose damages the mitochondria and thus is the main cause for the conditions associated with the Western diet--much, much, more the cause than insulin resistance, type-2 diabetes, and weight gain, all of which are caused by mitochondrial dysfunction, which starts first in the liver.