http://healthfully.org/rhi/id1.html-- 4/13/16,
33 pgs
Read carefully the material on
corporate medicine, then you will understand what I would do if experiencing an
AMI or had CVD.
For background there are a number of
articles on related topic such as hypertension, diet, cholesterol, etc. See #4
or use the internal google search engine or each page of the recommended sites,
/rg, /rc, /rhi etc.
1 long-page
of illustration and photos is at http://healthfully.org/rhi/id2.html
6-page, short non-technical version is at http://healthfully.org/rc/id11.html
5 page least technical version at http://healthfully.org/rns/id2.html
Topics
1 Introduction to CVD
|
13 Risk factors
|
24 Spasms causing occlusion, bleeding,
perforation with PCI
|
2 Bashing pharma
|
14 Key points for MI
|
25 Atherectomy
|
3 Causes for MI & CVD
|
15 The ad post hoc fallacy
|
26 Bypass surgery
|
4 JK topic articles
4a Symptoms
|
Ancillary
materials
|
27 Hopes hypothesis buried
|
5 Recommended prompt treatment
|
16 Cardiac
arrhythmia 16b procedures
|
28 Summation
|
6 Diagnosis of AMI
|
17 Thrombolysis (t-PA)
|
29 Non-technical
summation
|
7 Prognosis
|
18 Angiogram and side effects
|
30 Why pharma is against aspirin
|
8 Treatment
|
19 Renal reaction to Iodine contrast
|
31) Merits of exercise—journal article
|
9 Drugs of value
|
20 Angioplasty procedure (PCI)
|
32) Restenosis 52%--journal article
|
10 Avoid list
|
21
Angioplasty for AMI & CVD
|
33) Description of angiogram and angioplasty
procedures
|
11 Recovery in hospital and nursing home
|
22 Cholesterol embolism
|
|
12 Do list prior to MI and subsequently
|
23 Restenosis and increased mortality
|
|
Abbreviations
AMI Acute myocardial
infarction
|
|
MeS
Metabolic syndrome
|
AS Atherosclerosis
|
|
MI
Myocardial infarction
|
CABG
Coronary bypass surgery
|
|
PCI
Angioplasty
|
CME
Continuing medical education
|
|
PPI
Protein pump inhibitor
|
CVD
Cardiovascular disease
|
|
T2D
Type 2 Diabetes
|
KOL
Key opinion leader
|
|
t-PA Thrombolysis, fibrolytic therapy
|
Link
to definition page
Two Notes: 1) following
editing convention for quotes, square brackets, [ ], are insertion. 2) Footnotes
are liberally used--most are details
that would break the flow of discussion.
Introduction:
“Each year [2005] 1.5 million Americans experience a heart attack and
460,000 are fatal, and of those who die, almost half die suddenly, before they
can get to a hospital” AHA. 630,000
die
of heart disease (1 in 4 deaths) and coronary heart disease kills over 370,000,
and 735,000 have a heart attack, Center for Disease Control (gov).
What
will likely happen to the over 1 million American hospitalized and during
recover phase? Should they rely upon the
treatment guidelines set upon by
corporate medicine, which physicians adhere to for a confluence
of reasons?
The following of treatment protocol (guidelines) for AMI and CVD, which are written by pharma’s KOLs (key opinion leaders)
results in an average of 6 patented
drugs prescribed long-term. They cost
over $100,000 per year.
There is a fundamental conflict of interest between the patient and
corporate profits. This paper exposes the results of pharma’s influence. Two
themes are developed: what should and shouldn’t be done for a heart
attack (Myocardial Infarction, MI, AMI, Acute), and what should and shouldn’t be done for CVD. Because of the mountains of tobacco science, special attention is
given to expose junk treatments.[1]
The choices I would make are based upon my extensive knowledge of health science, select journal
articles, and what the choruses
of professors, who are critics, say.
1) Bashing Pharma:
To accept the analysis
given below it is
essential that you rise above pharma’s mantra
of safe and effective:
corporate medicine is shaped by
maximization of profits, what I call tobacco
ethics. Sorting through pharma’s influences requires
my carefully research of the journal literature free of marketing
science bias[2]--what I call tobacco science. Bad
Pharma (title of a book by Prof. Ben Goldacre) has seamlessly constructed a house
on distorted health
science that ultimately maximizes their profits. Through their selection of
KOLs, Big bad pharma
seamlessly frames the discussion:
through their KOLs
they writes medical textbooks, provides
the required continuing medical
education (CME), and they set up
clinical
guidelines, all of which is supported by their
tobacco
science.
Physicians believe in what they have been taught, and even when
skeptical about some areas, they will follow the treatment guidelines unless
their patient requests otherwise. The
$800 billion gorilla (a phrase used by Prof Marcia
Angell) has captured
the regulatory system world-wide. Through corporate tobacco
ethics they cause
much more harm than tobacco. To limit their harm, you need to understand why
‘bad’ applies to ‘pharma’, to sort out what is good from bad, and to break free
of the influence of your doctors and media so that you direct your treatments
and live a healthy lifestyle.
There is a chorus of critics who have broken with pharma to
uphold scientific and academic standards; they have published books and given
lectures exposing the tobacco science
concerning statins,
cholesterol, fats, diet, fructose, psychiatric drugs, type-2 diabetes, aspirin,
cardiovascular disease (CVD), etc., and
bad pharma. The pattern of pharma
funding tobacco science to justify
clinical guidelines applies to all
major areas of treatment. Pharma and
corporate media have marginalized the critics.
Having reviewed their evidence, I stand upon their shoulders. On the
video pages you will find links to
their lectures
and
documentaries,
and a list of their
books
and websites. Of the 12 topics on the
video page, Section #4 is on CVD, and
Section #1 on bad pharma. Harvard
Professor Marcia Angell President’s lecture will convince you of her claim:
“We certainly are in a health care crisis,
If we had set out to design the worst system that we could imagine, we couldn't
have imagined one as bad as we have.“ Once you come to recognize the business model
used by bad pharma, than you have good reason to believe that tobacco
ethics generates distortion
based upon tobacco science
to achieve marketing
ethics. It is appliesd to all
areas of
medicine, thus Professor Angell’s words are horrifically accurate. As prof. Prof. Ben
Goldacre states, “A perverse system produces perverse
results.” What pharma seamlessly teaches doctors as being
in the best interest of their
patients, very often
isn’t. Successful treatment isn’t
measured by how many have survived, but
rather it should be on how many would have survived if the physicians knew what
the best treatment is! Marketing is about putting lipstick on a pig,
and Pharma spends over $100 billion
yearly, most of
which goes to “educating” doctors—over twice what is spent on television
commercials. This message
pharma’s KOLs produce is supported by clinical
guidelines that are
spoon-fed to the public and our doctors to create block buster
drugs. All this occurs with the support of the pharma-friendly
FDA. Safe and effective
is the mantra of
pharma and the FDA—not
mine.
Chorus
of critics: There is a revolt among doctors over the
corruption of a once noble profession. The
AllTrials,
Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (Oxford University), and the Cochrane Collaboration which has over 37,000 volunteers, are examples
of the growing opposition to corruption worked by pharma. There is a chorus
of critics who meet the highest academic standards
and publish articles in the leading journals (including the JAMA, NEJM, BMJ,
and Lancet (American Medical Journal, New England Journal of Medicine, and
British medical Journal) and they publish nearly with every issue an article
critical of pharma’s tobacco science. My
very strong academic background in science and philosophy, 40 years of studies
in medicine, and 12 years of building this website has driven me to investigate
the junk science and make this, as of 2009, the theme of healthfully.org. My
investigation of the leading cause of death has led to agree with critics that pharma’s
version is totally wrong and to set down what I would do if I had CVD, and/or
an AMI. The evidence I
uncovered since 2004, when healthfully.org was found, shows that what is said
about conditions, causes, and treatments for CVD is an example of pharma’s
business model. And given the frequency of their divergence
from science, I must be skeptical of all claims that serve business ends. It
is as Harvard Professor Marcia Angell
states: We certainly are in a health
care crisis … If we had set out to design the worst system that we could
imagine, we couldn’t have imagined one as bad as we have. If in doubt,
watch her
President’s Lecture, University of
Montana, which proves those words, and/or click on the links above.
3)
Causes of MI and CVD: Since I am writing on CVD and MI, it
is essential to correct the misconceptions about
heart attacks and atherosclerosis (AS)
fed us by bad pharma about cholesterol and saturated fats being the fundamental
cause of CVD. Myocardial infarction
(MI) occurs when blood flow stops to part of the heart muscle
causing damage thereto which may cause heart failure, angina pain, irregular
heartbeat, or cardiac arrest. The AMI
starts with young vulnerable atherosclerotic
plaque leaking which when a blood clot (thrombosis) forms that blocks the flow
of blood to a large portion of the heart muscles. “Atherosclerosis is
therefore a syndrome affecting arterial blood vessels due to a chronic inflammatory response of
WBCs in the walls of arteries” Wiki. This
inflammation
(like most inflammation) is caused by pathogens, a fact known by autopsy
evidences for over a hundred years.[3] Briefly put, risk of AS very significantly increases with endothelial dysfunction[4] which
permits pathogens to pass
through the endothelial
cells that line the artery walls and enter artery tissue below settling in the tunica intima layer.
These pathogens depending on type and numbers can cause an immune
response, which will cause the white blood cells and LDL[5] to
be actively transported through the endothelial cells into the tunica intima layer where
the
pathogens are. This immune response creates
debris which can overwhelm the debris-removal system of the macrophages (type
of immune cell). This drives the
formation of young-soft plaque—think
of a newly formed boil (also called a furuncle).
If not removed, this plaque will gradually harden
with the growth of fibrous tissues and develop a hard cap. Over time this
process if widespread will
result in condition called atherosclerosis
(AS). The harden plaque will cause
the arteries to
loose elasticity and thus hypertension develops. However, it is not the hardened
mature plaque
that
leaks, but rather the young-fresh
plaque also called “vulnerable plaque (non-occlusive or soft plaque)” Wiki. This type of plaque causes MI and ischemic
strokes[6]—remember this for later discussion. This young plaque only causes under 50%
occlusion which is insufficient to show up through the widely used imaging
techniques of angiogram.[7] The leaking of young plaque explains
why
about half of all heart attacks occur in those without the symptoms of atherosclerosis.
Those with symptomatic atherosclerosis are often
(but not always) producing young, soft plaque at an accelerated rate compared
to the general populace without CVD, thus
their higher risk for MI. Pharma profits
greatly from treating signs such as hypertension rather than developing
treatments to prevent atherogenesis. It
is like treating the fever accompanying bronchitis rather than treating the
underlying bacterial lung infection. And
pharma does even better through treating LDL and its cholesterol content with a
family of drugs called statins (more on that later). Pharma’s business
model doesn’t include
prevention, thus the compelling evidence such as autopsy studies that prove that
atherosclerosis is caused by pathogens is ignored: not one cardiology textbook
acknowledges this
cause. There are hundreds of articles on
pathogens in the artery walls, yet the science is excluded by pharma’s KOL-generated
account of atherogenesis
and CVD. For conformation use scholar.Google.com
and enter
pathogens + atherosclerosis. There
is also numerous journal articles on
the immune function of LDL (enter LDL +
immune). LDL at the site of
infection absorbs and neutralizes reactive chemicals and toxins, yet this too
is missed by cardiology textbooks. LDL
serves two purposes one to transport for cell repair and reproduction the
essential fatty acids and cholesterol and that of fighting infection. The taught
version, called lipid-cholesterol
hypothesis for the development of CVD
is based on metabolic syndrome (MES)
and artery-clogging cholesterol and fats and it
fails
to mention pathogens; or that
cholesterol and fatty
acids constitute less than 50% of plaque.
Their flawed theory of CVD demonstrates
pharma’s power to frame the discussion
of medical science.[8] Their power to generate tobacco
science and
to “educate” has been used to frame not just CVD, but also all areas
of medicine. Sadly research dollars and medical advice
does is not significantly directed to the pathogens and endothelial
dysfunction.
The process just
described with pathogens, leukocytes, and LDL’s role
as absorbing toxins resolves issues
that the standard,
pharma-generated description of
the accumulation of cholesterol and fat
fails. The issues:
Why do over half of all people who have an MI, have
cholesterol level below 240?
Why do people with high
cholesterol live longer (the Framingham Study)?
Why are there macrophages and
other white blood cells in the atheroma?
Why is LDL actively transported to the
atheroma?
Why
would humans evolve a system of vulnerable LDL that causes, rather than
prevents, AMIs?
Why do autopsy studies find pathogens in the ruptured
atheroma and
plaque?
Is LDL a marker for atherogenesis?
One would expect that during the plaque
forming stage of an atheroma the level of cholesterol and LDL would rise given
their role in cell reproduction, growth, and repair; however, the overall demand
of the infected regions of the arteries is only a very small fraction of the
total body’s need based upon its constant turnover of cells. (Remember,
as stated above, both cholesterol
and fats are the building blocks of cell walls and membranes, and thus the need
for LDL). Moreover the atherogenesis process
is constant over long periods of time, thus there won’t be a diagnostic rise in
LDL, cholesterol, C-reactive protein or other marker for inflammation. This
lack of relationship between markers for
inflammation and atherogenesis entails the only an indirect association to
atherogenesis. Thus people with certain
chronic infections, such as form H. pylori in the stomach and atherosclerosis,
is rather an association of that bacteria and their possible migration to the
artery walls where they would play a role in the development of atherosclerosis
(possible a minor one), and as a consequence the association with those
bacteria is both indirect and weak. This
helps to explain why though LDL and cholesterol are found in plaque they are
not a significant marker for CVD. Moreover,
given the vital roles the contents
of LDL plays in cell health, to lower LDL is a bad idea. Though pharma does
all it can to hide the side effects of their statins ,
these side effects are life-threatening, especially among for the elderly. For
more on this go to healthfully.org and
enter in the internal Google search engine cholesterol
+ side effects. The chorus
of scientists and doctors who have gone
public over the cholesterol myth are standing on
solid grounds. Enter
Cholesterol myth in a search of books at http://www.amazon.com/
for pages
of books on this issue.
4) Extensive reviews of the evidence for the conditions
associated with CVD and drugs used
relevant to the topic
raised here are found in a number of papers:
click on links Arrhythmia,
Anticoagulants,
Atherogenesis
& MI, Aspirin, aspirin
inhibits atherosclerosis, Hypertension, Statins, Cholesterol
Myth, Cholesterol
Myth, Source History, infection in artery wall causes Cardiovascular disease, Endothelial
dysfunction
and the over one dozen articles on diet
related topics.
What follows builds upon those works just listed. I will describe what
I would do if I developed
CVD and if I had an AMI; it is not
based on pharma’s
tobacco science.
4a) Symptoms: An MI occurs when unstable plaque leaks from a
coronary artery and forms a
clot downstream which often becomes larger through the formation of a
blood-clot. “In greater than 80% of MI
the leaked plaque constitutes less
than 40% of the obstruction. Spontaneous
thrombolysis [natural
dissolving of the clot that caused the MI] occurs in about 2/3 patients within
24 hours” (Merck Manual 2006, p.
636).[9] “The onset of symptoms in myocardial
infarction (MI) is usually gradual,
over several minutes, and rarely instantaneous. Chest pain is the most common symptom of acute myocardial infarction and is often
described as a sensation of tightness, pressure, or squeezing. Chest pain due
to ischemia [a lack of blood and hence
oxygen supply] to the heart muscle is termed angina pectoris. Pain radiates most often to the left arm, but may also radiate to the lower jaw, neck, right arm, back, and epigastrium [upper-middle
abdomen], shortness
of breath (dyspnea) occurs when the damage to the heart limits the
output of the left ventricle, causing left ventricular failure and consequent pulmonary edema. Other symptoms include diaphoresis (an excessive form of sweating), weakness, light-headedness, nausea, vomiting, and palpitations and sudden death (frequently due to ventricular fibrillation) can occur in myocardial
infarctions. Women also report more numerous symptoms compared with men (2.6 on
average vs. 1.8 symptoms in men).[10] The most common symptoms of MI in women include dyspnea (shortness of breath),
weakness, and fatigue. The differential diagnosis includes other catastrophic causes of chest pain, such as pulmonary embolism, aortic dissection, pericardial effusion causing cardiac tamponade, tension pneumothorax, and esophageal rupture,"
Wiki. Because of the
difficulty of identifying with
confidence an MI and the importance of prompt treatment, when suspecting an
MI seek prompt help. The extent
of damage to the heart is can
in
most cases be greatly
reduced if at first sign I taking
sublingually several 325 mg aspirin (uncoated).
Aspirin irreversible blocks the formation of thromboxane A2 to produce
an inhibitory effect on platelet aggregation (clot formation). Since MI
consists of the leaked plaque partially clogging a coronary artery and the
subsequent complete or near complete blockage by the platelets that form
a clot, thus aspirin is
the best prompt intervention.[11] Nitroglycerine causes dilation of the artery
walls there by improving the flow of blood past the partial clot. However, since
it lowers the blood pressure,
it is contraindicated for those whose systolic blood pressure is below 90. The
subsequent hospital diagnosis and clinical
guideline treatment has minimal endpoint benefits—with the exception is
for
the few who have been resuscitated or who have required mechanical assistance
to stay alive, and
then survive.
[1] To start with there hasn’t been a major
breakthrough which has saved millions of lives.
Each claim is misplaced. For
example the reduction in MI and death between 1970 and 2000 is nearly entirely
from the reduction in smoking, from 46% in 1976 to 16% in 201; this reduction
lowers events by over 20%. Not only are their fewer smokers, but those who
smoke, smokes less. At a pack a day the risk of MI doubles that of a non-smoker.
Pharma claims the reduction resulted from the use of statins and antihypertensive
drugs.
[3]
For a concise, convincing review of the evidence for the role of pathogens go
to Ignore
the Awkward! by Prof. Uffe
Ravnskov chapter 15, and these two links.
[4] Major causal factors are carbon monoxide and
other products of tobacco smoke, chronic infections such as gingivitis, and the
Western high sugar and carb diet which causes fat accumulation in the liver which
causes insulin resistance. That
primitive peoples have eating a traditional diet have a very low rate of MI
among their elderly is strong proof.
Also those peoples who traditionally eat a healthful diet and do not
smoke also have a very low rate of MI.
What is the dietary factor for endothelial dysfunction is hotly
debated. I favor as cause the transient
elevated levels of fructose and glucose following a Western diet meal.
[5] LDL has a second
function that of
attaching to and neutralizing toxins produced by pathogens. LDL is a blood transport
system for
cholesterol and triglycerides (fat) to areas of cell growth—a healing and
immune cell growth occurs during an infection. Thus there are 2 reasons for LDL
to be present in the tunica intima of artery walls—where plaque accumulates.
[6] About 85% of all strokes involve the leaking
of plaque; the remaining 15% is due to a hemorrhage.
[7]
This raises the question,: Why the hell are they using imaging to find plaque
which doesn’t leak and cause AMI, and the treating it with physical
interventions of CABG bypass
surgery and
angioplasty? These junk treatments are
exposed in paragraph 20-27.
[8]
Having extensive background in health science, as I examined the contents of
medical textbooks flawed. A tragic
example: One hundred years ago many
researchers considered atherosclerosis an infectious disease…. The following
statement by two American pathologists,
Oskar Klotz and M. F. Manning is typical for the general view at that time
[1911]: “There is every indication that
the production of tissue in the intima [innermost layer of the arterial wall]
is the result of a direct irritation of that tissue by the presence of
infections or toxins” In Prof Uffe Ravnskov Ignore the Awkward! How the Cholesterol Myths are Kept Alive
2010, p 134.
[9] This is why the thrombolysis, injection of a
drug that breaks up the platelet portion of the clot, proves in real-world
hospital settings to be of minimal value—contrary to pharma funded studies and
what their opinion leaders teach.
Moreover, because of this spontaneous resolution, must MIs go
unnoticed: “estimates of the prevalence
of silent MIs vary between 22 and 64%” Wiki.
[10]
This is mainly due to size: tall people
have a bigger heart and bigger coronary blood vessels; thus complete blockage
by a thrombosis is less likely. This
results in less symptoms and greater survival rate.
[11]
I have been taking an average of two 325 mg of aspirin since1992. Aspirin (and
when needed estradiol or
testosterone) are the most healthful chemicals we can take. Aspirin reduces the risk of cancer and
metastatic cancer dramatically, reduces the risk of atherosclerosis, and
has other health benefits. Aspirin is a less caustic form
of salicylic
acid (a plant
hormone) found widely in plants and made in small amounts in our body. Mammals have evolved methods for utilizing
the salicylic acid form of aspirin.
|
5)
Recommended Prompt Treatment: I would take sublingually UNCOATED 325 mg aspirin and continue with the aspirin both orally
and sublingually for a total of 6 in the first hour. I keep a small pill box
in the car. “Since 50% of all deaths from AMI occur within 2 ½ hours of onset of
the clinical syndrome, the first two hours of management are critical” Merck
1982. Deaths in this period result primarily
from ventricular fibrillation
without underlying AMI or
fibrillation associated with an ischemic event (AMI). Promptly taking
aspirin and getting to the hospital significantly improve my chance for
survival and satisfactory recovery. They
could save my life by injecting adrenalin (epinephrine), use of CPR
(cardio-pulmonary resuscitation), cardioversion (electric shock to the heart at
a specific moment in the cardiac cycle of pumping) to treat abnormally fast
heart beat—tachycardia--or cardiac arrhythmia, a defibrillator (random electric
shock to chest), or a pacemaker to prevent arrhythmia. Mild arrhythmia is a
common effect of an AMI, and time
heals, and is often without symptoms, but can be observed on an
electrocardiogram. I would absolute
refuse drugs for arrhythmia; they don’t save lives and likely increase the risk
of dying, but for an exception, medications for pain. Morphine --or like opiate--and
lidocaine
administered through an IV to manage pain.
They can be of modest value; their usage goes back over 50 years. The use of diagnostic equipment, complex diagnosis with
its obscure terminology,
along with a concerned cardiologist and nurses is all part of the pitch to do
what they think is best and what clinical guidelines and hospital administers
require. This efforts has been seamlessly
orchestrated by bad pharma to gain my confidence in the cardiologist’s
expertise so that I who would take an assortment of drugs approved by the FDA
on the basis of surrogate endpoints of
lower blood pressure, improved heart rhythm, lower cholesterol, and improved
pattern of heart beat on an electrography (ECG). They
are taken on the belief that these surrogate endpoints prove longer life; they
don’t for the real-world population. That
is why surrogate endpoints and tobacco science trials are used to sully the
medical literature and convince the cardiologist, nurses, and public of longer
disease-free life.
6)
Diagnosis of AMI:
Diagnosis begins with assessment of the patient’s complaints and
physical status and would include an ECG (an EKG) echocardiography, a sonogram of the heart
(also known as an ultrasound and echocardiography), and cardiac markers
(blood work) to confirm the diagnosis. The procedure involves reading the
pattern on a sheet of graph paper or monitor.
ST elevation and depression have false positive rate of 15-20% (which is slightly higher
in women than men) and a false negative rate of 20-30%,[1] Wiki. I would refuse the angiogram and angioplasty—for
reasons see Ancillary
Materials #s
18-24below.
The angiogram (angiography) have
risks
that are
grossly under rated.[2] The
ends do not justify angiogram: I would
not submit to an invasive, risky diagnosis that too often results in a
treatment that is contrary (yes contrary) to my best interest, and there are
other useful safe diagnostic tools. Echocardiogram provides helpful
information including the size and shape of the heart, chamber size, pumping
capacity, and the location and extent of tissue damage. The diagnostic equipment
and obscure medical
jargon functions to
establish the cardiologist as expert whom is committed to guiding me through my
medical emergency. Good intensions,
expensive diagnostic equipment, and my medical emergency won’t frighten me
into following pharma’s-KOL
generated guidelines, or to convince me based on doggy- clinical trials[3] that the PCI is my best
interest. There is a longlist of
abandoned procedures and drugs because they do more harm than good. The more
I submit, the more likely I will
continue to submit and my prognosis will get worse. I have seen too many people
who have had the
quality of their lives radically lowered and their death hastened by
treatments that were to prevent
an MI.
7) Prognosis: “Each
year [2005] 1.5 million
Americans experience a heart attack and 460,000 are fatal. Of those who die,
almost half die suddenly,
before they can get to a hospital” AHA. Crunching
the
numbers entails that of the 230,000 will die subsequent to arriving at the
hospital: and another 230.00 0
will die because of the AMI within the couple of days-- about 1
in 6 or 16%. This calculation is consistent with various sources of data.[4] Mortality
rate for those admitted to
the hospital that is not near death, is under 5%. Thus
I presume the remaining 95% will live to go home[5]. A much different picture is given for the
real-world patients. The AHA’s
Handbook of Emergency Cardiovascular Care for Healthcare Providers,
2004, p 31: prehospital deaths 52%, 24
hours in hospital 19%, 24-48 hours in hospital 8%, and next 30 days 21%. However,
this is for all patients including
the elderly and those with significant comorbidities. What I haven’t found
is numbers for those
under the age of 75 and without significant comorbidities (the feeble). Thus if I made it to
the hospital with an AMI, I would
probably survive the tobacco science taught by KOLs
and applied by dutifully by cardiologists, it certainly isn’t in my best
interest to give frick-and-frack my okay.
My father survived 4 heart attacks including two major ones. I recall
when he came home after the first
one that it would take at least 10 minutes to walk one block--I was 10 years
old. He lived 23 years from the first; died
from a stroke in 1976 at the age of 76.
President Dwight D. Eisenhower at the age of 65 had a major heart attack
requiring 6 weeks of hospitalization. He
suffered 6 more heart attacks and died 14 years after his first one in 1969 at
the age of 79. Both men smoke over 2
packs of cigarettes a day until their first heart attack. Their heart attacks
occurred before the day
of statins, hypertension drugs, thrombolysis, and bypass surgery (CABG), angioplasty,
ablation, and
drugs for arrhythmia. What’s new is good
for pharma. There are much better
choices, see #12 for
what I would do.
8) Treatment: If severe pain isn’t relieved by nitroglycerine
and aspirin, then I would request lidocaine and morphine[6]. I would not take oxygen,
it has been definitively shown to be of no value, and increases modestly
mortality, yet
is still part of the treatment protocol.[7] I
would tell my care givers that I have
within the last hour taken over 1 gram of aspirin.[8] The
use of anticoagulants is “relative contraindicated” (see guidelines)[9] and thus angiogram (see #s 18-24) which
leads to angioplasty because of the
risk of major damage to the artery. Even
If I hadn’t taken aspirin I would still refuse the angiogram and its
alternative thrombolysis
(see # 16-24). I would request uncoated
aspirin 325 mg
aspirin, and take a
total of 3.25 grams/day.
Even
if I met the 90 minute
window from first symptoms when modest increased
survival is demonstrated in industry funded trials, I would still refuse those
treatments. Meeting that time limit is
unlikely: one study placed
it at 1 per 125 patients
were treated within the 90 minute window from first symptoms.[10] Note, The industry-funded studies show
that PCI
for those with stable ischemia there is no benefit, and significant risk of harm (see #18-24)
. Thrombolysis,t-PA (tissue
plasminogen activator) is a drug which breaks down a
protein involved in the blood clot. [11] It
use for reperfusion is strongly associated with strokes and major bleeding
elsewhere. Reperfusion occurs
spontaneously (natural return of blood flow) in 65% of patients without intervention” Merck
Manual, 2006, P 636. This
is another reason while I will rely upon
mother-nature. The
endothelia cells can release a
protein that act like t-PA. Moreover, reperfusion
has been made much more likely by my promptly taking a large dose of
aspirin. Meta-analysis of randomized
trials comparing thrombolysis to angioplasty found the later had a 2% greater
comparative reduction in overall mortality-- published in the Lancet
& Oxford Journal;[12] however, quality trials in
real-world patients find no gain over standard medical treatment. Synchronized
electrical cardioversion
can be used to manage major
arrhythmia and major tachycardia (fast heart) if lidocaine and morphine are inadequate.
This is another procedure I would refuse
unless there is prolonged, serious ventricular fibrillation.
Implantable Cardiovascular
Defibrillator (ICD)
reduces risk of sudden death which could be prudent depending on severity of AMI.
Nitric Oxide
(NO) is of value
short term, and thus also nitroglycerin (GNT).[13] Glucocorticoids (GC) are a
class of steroid hormones that bind to
the glucocorticoid receptor (GR), and have
been shown too possible reduce infarction (damage). Given
the weak evidence I would avoid them. Other drugs such as beta blockers and ACE inhibitors
for
hypertension are often added. I
definitely avoid them
they will impair cognitive functions, and make the heart pump slower, thus weaker a bad thing. Their benefits have
been shown only through tobacco
science. I would refuse the other drugs
and treatments on the long list in the Handbook
of Emergency Cardiovascular Care
by the American Heart Association. Polypharmacy
entails a much higher risk that the combination of drugs will produce serious
side effects, side effect that while compromised by the heart attack is much
more likely to be fatal. The body has
evolved mechanism for healing, which too often pharma’s drugs interfere with.
Average life span after the first AMI
is 10 years; about the same as in the mid-1990s once anticoagulants became widely
used as standard
emergency room and recovery phase treatments. These drugs (heparin, warfarin and dicumarol) came on the market in the
late 1940s but were administered in the recovery
phase to prevent “thromboembolic
complications”...with
a “major
decrease in immediate morality rate following the use of dicumarol [similar
to
warfarin] in the first few weeks of illness,” Merck Manual, 1950, p. 1110. Its major benefit comes from the reduced
risk
of a second AMI while in the
hospital. Unfortunately it took
40 years before they or like
drugs were used long-term prophylactically in high risk patients. The
1961
Merck Manual 10th Ed., does
not
recommend the use of clot busting inhibiting drugs
as part of the emergency room treatment, but rather the subsequent use of heparin or warfarin
“for the
first 3 or 4 weeks”
(p 131). I mention
this historical bit so that you will know
that the miracle claimed by pharma is more marketing.[14] The rate of the subsequent MI
was greatly reduced by the addition
of an anticoagulant. That
was
the last major improvement. The advantages
of aspirin
over the other
anticoagulants
is well documented is not
taught in CME classes. Instead
they hear over and over again the risk of stomach bleeds caused by aspirin,
which is in fact no greater than those other anticoagulants, and only aspirin
lower significantly the
risk for Alzheimer’s
disease,
cancer, MI and atherogenesis.
9)
Drugs of value: Morphine
and lidocaine for pain; they reduce/prevent arrhythmia. Epinephrine (adrenalin), and norepinephrine are
is a
strong cardiac stimulant and areis
used for cardiac arrest. The anticoagulant aspirin in high does (3.5
grams, 11 of 325 mg) is safe (once the standard dose for arthritis) and it
makes unnecessary the dangerous family of anticoagulants given as standard
treatment. If subject to heartburn take
an antacid also, not a PPI.
10)
Avoid list: (in order of importance): downers (psychotropic drug), antiarrhythmics,[15]
electrical cautery for arrhythmia and like procedures, beta blockers, ACE
inhibitors, and other treatments for hypertension, angiogram and angioplasty,
thrombolysis (see #s 16 – 28) , all blood thinners such as
heparin since
high dose of aspirin prevent
future blood clotshas dissolved the clot, and oxygen[16].
11)
RECOVERY in hospital or nursing home: I would avoid the aforementioned, statins
and other cholesterol lowering drugs.
AT HOME:
Besides the aforementioned add avoid bypass
operation
(CABG). They only reduce angina pain, and there side
effects are grossly under reported. Angina
with improved lifestyle will gradually diminish as the body undergoes the
process of revascularization.
12)
Do List PRIOR MI
and while RECOVERING: Limit risk factors (list below). Low
carbohydrate diet
reduces reactive
chemical damage by glycation[17]
to the endothelia cells which
starts the process of atherogenesis.
Especially limit sugar, which is 50% fructose[18] the most reactive of the
monosaccharides. I increased
saturated fats and
mono-unsaturated fats as replacement for carbs. Polyunsaturated fats are
subjected to
rancidification in the body, a bad thing—see fats. We have 2 major metabolic systems for the production of
ATP, the energy molecule, one burns fats the other glucose from carbs. The obesity epidemic is caused by our high
carb-sugar Western diet. Fructose is in
part metabolized to fat in the liver.
High carb diet drives the storage of this fat in the liver,
and as a consequence insulin resistance gradually develops. Insulin resistance promotes fat storage
principle in fat and muscle tissues. What
we are told about fats is
wrong.[19] With
the low fat diet, carb are
increased. The fix is to replace carbs
with saturated fats and go on a cleansing
diet., which
takes only 2 weeks. Regular
strenuous exercise helps
regulate blood glucose levels and thus lowers insulin level. I have been on a low sugar and moderate carb
diet the last 2 years. I take
daily 325 mg of aspirin daily (it has many health
benefits
including reducing MI risk by 51%)[20] and reducinges AS
risk
based on its anti-inflammatory
effect. I keep in
my car a small pill container with
20-325 mg aspirin uncoated. I started taking
testosterone
when my level went
below 350. I got a prescription for a high dose (10% 2
gram lotion) filled at a compounding pharmacy, rather than the much lower dose branded
products.[21] It increases muscle mass
and strength
(my heart is a muscle),
lowers MI risk;
low testosterone
is associated
with metabolic syndrome, MI, and
aggressive prostate cancer. My wife takes estradiol
with progesterone (natural HRT)[22]
from a compounding pharmacy. It is very significantly
cardiovascular protective
and much more. I take CoQ10
and vitamin
C
because they prevent oxidative damage
to endothelial cells and long-term these antioxidants reduces
angina
pain, high blood pressure and risk for heart failure. Healthful
lifestyle and diet
is the best way
to promote revascularization. Our body is a demand
system, thus exercise is
very important.
13) RISK FACTORS:
Atherogenesis:
forming plaque is the underlying cause of MIs.
Early
stages of plaque formation cause over 80% of MIs, and half of MIs occur without
diagnosed CVD. Atherosclerosis
is a marker for this
process. Plaque formation is an inflammatory
response
in the walls of the arteries initiated by pathogens and the subsequent immune
response involving T-cells, macrophages and LDL—see MI CVD section above. High sugar high carb diet Western diet causes chemical damage to endothelia
cells which line the arteries. This
damage increasing the risk of pathogen passing into the walls of the
arteries. Change to a low refined carb,
low fructose diet by increasing as a source for energy fats, especially
saturated & monounsaturated fats. The
unnatural rancid fats and transfats contribute to endothelial cell
dysfunction.
Tobacco through
carbon monoxide is itsthe second most
important causal factor after which come glucose and fructose. A pack a day
long-term doubles the death rate
from MI & shortens life an
average of 7-12 years. Also the reactive
gasses mainly SO2 and NO2 promote atherogenesis. Diabetes
mellitus type
2 doubles (T2D)
risk of MI because
it increases the blood sugars level, thus damaging endothelial cells that line
the artery walls and are the gate keepers to the artery walls. It also is associated
with a fatty liver (NAFLD) which
affects various liver regulatory systems.
Low testosterone
is associated with metabolic syndrome and thus increased risk of MI. Low estrogen because
estradiol is a regulatory hormone similar to testosterone and low levels
affects many systems the net result is an increased risk of age related
conditions including osteoporosis, heart attack, dementia. It even improves
blood
flow. Long-term estradiol
HRT lowers
the risk over 44%[23]. Obesity defined by a body
mass index (BMI)
greater than 30 (approximately 25%
above lean body weight) increases risk 50%.
Obesity is associated with metabolic syndrome, type-2 diabetes, CVD, MI, fatty
liver disease, insulin
resistance, et al. Polypharmacy (taking
regularly 4 or more
prescription drugs), some
antibiotics, taking long-term NSAIDS (except aspirin), and
sedative increase AMI risk
. Some such as the NSAIDs (but aspirin)[24] are atherogenic others like
hypertension,
arrhythmia, and
psychiatric drugs weaken the muscles through their effect on neurotransmitters
and thus increase risk of dying from an MI or
arrhythmia. Sedentary
lifestyle is a major direct causal factor because of reduced vitality (weaker
heart muscle) and its secondary factors, an because of its association
with smoking, obesity, substance abuse, use of sedative, polypharmacy etc. Recent
study showed it to be the 3rd lead
cause of death. Arrhythmia is associated
with sudden cardiac arrest. And depending on type can increase the risk
of blood clotting which is causal for ischemic events. But more significant
is that it is associated
with a weak heart muscle and thus lowering the chance of survival during an AMI.
The formation of
plaque results from pathogens. Thus
there is an association with infectious conditions such as gingivitis and
infectious agents including Chlamydophila
pneumoniae, H. pylori,
and others.
Infections
leading to poor health such as colitis are causal indirectly. Poor health: the weak, infirmed, the aged,
the obese the diabetic are more
likely
to have an MI
or sudden death due to arrhythmia.
Fibrinogen, C-reactive protein,
hypertension, high
serum glucose and insulin resistance
among others are
all risks factors for
MI because
they are associated with underlying
conditions such as
infections, AS, MeS, T2D, etc. To
treat the signs and not the condition in general is fruitless, but profitable
for pharma. Cholesterol,
LDL, and triglycerides are not
associated with AMI and CVD. Endothelial
dysfunction converts
young plaque into vulnerable plaque. The integrity of the endothelial cells
determines the risk of plaque leakage. Risk
factors include the Western diet, reactive chemicals such as carbon monoxide
from smoking, liver disease, high blood sugars, T2D, ethanol, toxins produced
by microbes, active infection at site[25], reactive
chemicals released during cell and pathogen necrosis, large liquid core, and various
pharmaceutical drugs. Three major factors
working together determine risk and survival:
“Vulnerable
plaques are not the only culprit factors for the development of acute coronary
syndromes, myocardial infarction, and sudden cardiac death. Vulnerable blood
(prone to thrombosis [clotting]) and vulnerable myocardium (prone to fatal
arrhythmia [weak heart]) play an important role in the outcome. Therefore, the
term “vulnerable patient” may be more appropriate and is proposed now for the
identification of subjects with high likelihood of developing cardiac events in
the near future” AHA, 2003. 14) KEY
POINTS for MI: At first sign I
would take 325 mg sublingually and three 325 mg orally of
not coated aspirin then . Ccontinuing
taking aspirin up to 2.5 grams in
the first 2 hours and 3.5 grams per day.
I would go
promptly to a hospital. In Hospital I would tell
them I am not a pill popper, thus I want minimal drugs and will continue with
aspirin as my anticoagulant, no PPI for indigestion (prefer Tums), no blood
pressure medications, no arrhythmia drugs, or psychotropic
drugs; also no
to t-PA, angiograms, and other invasive procedures. I would tell them that I want an opiate if in significant
pain such as morphine. Lidocaine could
be administered in intravenously for
arrhythmia and pain. Nitroglycerin and
nitrous oxide are acceptable. Recovery
phase: Again I would
remind them that I am not you are not a
pill popperand continue refusing drugs listed above,
plus definitely no to statins and sedatives. I would take with meals 2, 325 mg
aspirin (see aspirin). Standard drug arsenal consists of 3 high hypertension drugs, PPI,
anticoagulant, mood elevator (actually a sedative), statins, arrhythmia, anticoagulants, and drugs,
and for angina pain often a
sedative sold as an analgesic such as Lyrica and acetaminophen which is an NSAID that increases the
risk of an MI. The only invasive treatment I would consider is
a pacemaker. Bypass and stent are oversold,
they only manage angina pain.
But also adopting a healthy lifestyle will gradually reduce angina pain
through revascularization. I would
study the article on for a heart health and start
exercising and healthy diet.
The Video
Library is valuable. 15) The ad post hoc fallacy (after this because of that) proves naught.
My father in the pre big-Pharma era lived 23
years after his first major heart attack in 1953. He had another major one in
1955 and 2 minor ones several years later.
He died in 1976 of a stroke.
Dwight Eisenhower had a major heart attack in 1955. Both were heavy
cigarette smokers who quit
after their first heart attack.
Subsequently Eisenhower had 6 more heart attacks and died of congestive
heart failure in 1969, 14 years after the first one. What pharma and the doctors
(all of whom
are educated by pharma) sell is hope, the reality is that for 98
out of 100 patients following the guidelines will do more harm than good, and
those 2% have been resuscitated from death or near death. Most people survive
in spite of rather than
because of the treatments. The body of
long living mammals is designed to heal, to believe that what has been done by
your doctor made the difference is to slight the natural healing process;
it is the ad post hoc
fallacy of attributing
causality to the treatment.
[2] I shudder when I visualize a hard-long object
being pushed through my arteries from my leg into my heart. I can see it bumping
& rubbing against
(damaging) the paper-thin single layer of endothelial
cells that have essential
functions as a barrier and regulator.
[4] I suspect that this figure is
grossly inflated by relying upon death certificates (a very unreliable tally
method). If they just gave figures for
sudden deaths and AMI of otherwise health people, that number would I
geustimate be about 600,000
deaths—to eliminate the frail elderly
& infirmed. This is another
example of disease awareness campaign done to promote the use of drugs.
[5]
One study found 0.4%
of patients with a low-risk profile died after 90 days, whereas in high-risk
people it was 21.1%” Wiki.
[6]. APAP (acetaminophen, Tylenol) is the most common under the not-clinically-proven assumption
of
enhancing the analgesic effect. APAP
is the number 1 cause of drug
induced liver failure. Tramadol and
other sedatives have been given FDA approval for pain, avoid them. Sedated you
won’t be able to make informed
choices concerning your treatment.
[7]
Every additional action by the care givers will be billed. In theory oxygen
should help oxygen starved
heart muscles survive; however,
in excess it promotes toxic oxidation of the debris from the dead heart tissue, which hinders its disposal.
[8] Aspirin “inhibits platelet
hemostasis,… a dose of 0.65 g of aspirin
approximately doubles the mean bleed time of normal person for a period of 4 to
7 days” Goodman and Gilman’s Pharmacological Basis of
Therapeutics,
6th Ed, p. 692.
[9]
The guide wire and balloon tip are pushed through and thus bump against the
artery walls causing damage, sometimes puncturing them. With an anticoagulant
the subsequent bleed
could result in a medical emergency—thus the contraindication.
[10] Only those already in the hospital would
receive PCI within 90 minutes of first symptoms. Cholesterol embolism is very
strongly
associated with invasive procedures: 20
of 22 patients in a histologically post mortem proven cases. With PCI, e.g., Cholesterol
embolism issues became evident with 3 months, most within 3 weeks, at.
This cause of risk is rarely mentioned, and if the adverse event occurs the
physician will likely attribute it to natural causes, not their invasive
treatment! Moreover, the typical “Anticoagulant therapy appeared to exert
an
adverse affect” at, and also at, which found warfarin a cause.
[11] Statements
that t-PA is controversial at all timeframes and should not be considered
standard of care
·
American Academy of
Emergency Medicine18
·
Australasian College for
Emergency Medicine19
·
Canadian Association of
Emergency Physicians (currently posted policy)20
New Zealand Faculty of
the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine21
http://www.bmj.com/content/350/bmj.h1075?etoc=
[12] There are many ways to cook the
result. One way would be to select for
the trial those who have been on anticoagulants. Since pharma on the
information (raw data) they don’t have to inform the journal peer article
review panel of the selection of patient on blood thinners. Given them another
blood thinner in the
hospital would have less affect than if a real world population was tested.
[13] “Nitrous
oxide plays an important role in attenuates cardiac remodeling [enlargement]
& apoptosis after MI via suppression of oxidative
stress-mediated signaling pathways.
Nitroglycerin is a “ Nitrates which
undergo denitration within
the body to produce NO” Wiki.
[14] Pharma
doesn’t mention the benefit from the
reduction of smoking: 46%
in the 60s to 16% in 2015.
[15]
“… Been shown to be ineffective.
Lidocaine may be used for 24 to 48 hours to treat ventricular
tachycardia” (Conn’s supra 403).
[16] Proven to be ineffective yet
still routinely
administered, also, higher
death
rate. Oxygen increases the rate of the breakdown of
the mitochondria within the muscle cells of the heart, thereby offsetting its
beneficial effect. This is also why
when restoring blood flow by a PCI or angioplasty does not result in a prompt
improvement in the patient’s condition.
[17] Glycation is the random attachment of a sugar
molecule—mainly glucose and fructose.
This damages tissues including the endothelial cells that line the way,
and fructose which goes to the liver, in sufficient amount causes insulin
resistance. At Recommended
healthful diet you
will find articles on diet and cardiovascular disease. There you can find out
why saturated fats are
best and polyunsaturated because of rancidification are the worst along with
trans fats.
[18] Fructose is the worse of sugar: it is 7
times more reactive than the monosaccharide glucose, and it goes to the liver
where it damages the liver 2 ways, one by glycation, the other by conversion to fat. On
a high carb diet this fat accumulates in the liver. This is because
insulin is
secreted by the pancreas to lower the toxic high level of blood glucose, and
insulin does this by telling the body to store fat and burn glucose. This high level
of insulin gradually brings on a condition called insulin
resistance, cells
become resistant to insulin and more insulin is secreted. This mucks up the weight control system for most
people—for summary.
[19] Polyunsaturated fats are
subject to oxidation in the body and while cook, once oxidized they contribute
to CVD similar to trans fats.
Polyunsaturated fats are cheap, which is why they are promoted, and
saturated fats criticized, contrary to the
evidence.
[20] Low dose is a pharma
plow, for long term it doesn’t have an antiplatelet effect—pharma studies are
all short-term. Typical treatment following an for MI runs
with insurance between 66 & 71,000 per year—but compliance is only about
31%, NEMJ (what side effects?).
[21]
Again we heave the workings of bad pharma.
They set up clinical trials designed to fail by setting up small
clinical trials, using low dose testosterone,
to short a period for to produced clinically significant results. More
business as usual.
[22]
Progesterone was not available in pill form until 1995 because of poor
absorption. The micronized in oil has
not been marketed with estradiol. The combination is available only from a
compounding pharmacy. Thus there are no
major endpoint studies.
[23]
Braunwald, Heart Disease
…, 5th Ed, 1997supra, p. 1142. “In
a meta-analysis of case control cross-sectional, and prospective
studies, the
relative risk for CVD in postmenopausal subjects taking estrogen was 0.56
compared with
postmenopausal subjects not taking estrogen.”The effects
of the various HRT
formulas other than Prempro (above) as to side effects have not been thoroughly investigated. Prempro is the worst. Some
formulas are good. Using a
progestins
different than MPA, another study found 50% and the Danish
study cut deaths
115%. See The natural formula is probably
best for overall healthHRT- for benefits & how bad pharma with the NIH (National Institute of Health)
deliberately used the worst HRT in the WHI Trial to get women of HRT.-see footnote 14.
[24] Aspirin is natural because the salicylic acid form of aspirin is found widely in plants.
[25]
Infection causes immune cells and they can release various digesting enzymes
(MMPs 2, 3, 9 etc.) which can weaken a young cap.
Ancillary
Materials:
On Arrhythmia, tThrombolysis (t-PA),
Angioplasty (PCI), Atherectomy,
& Coronary
artery Bbypass graph
(CABG)
While thrombolysis is reserved for an acute AMI, angiogram
and angioplasty are used during an AMI
as well as prior to and during recover phase.
Bypass surgery and atherectomy are done only prophylactically.
16) Cardiac Arrhythmia
is a broad classification, which includes too rapid heartbeat
(tachycardia)
above 100, and too slow heart beat
(bradycardia) below 60, and irregular heart beat. “Many types of arrhythmia have no symptoms. When symptoms
are
present these may include palpitations or feeling a pause between heartbeats.
More seriously there may be lightheadedness, passing out, shortness of breath, or chest pain“ Wiki. Arrhythmia is
quite common, even among children, and it often goes unnoticed. During an AMI,
arrhythmia is quite common; and
only significant for about 15% of patients. “Most
episodes have no symptoms.[3]
Occasionally there may be heart palpitations, fainting, shortness of breath, or chest pain,…
Atrial fibrillation [AF]
is the most common serious abnormal
heart rhythm… the
percentage of people with AF increases with age with 0.14% under 50 years old,
4% between 60 and 70 years old, and 14% over 80 years old being affected.” Wiki. For
purpose paperof this and
following discussion, I
will focus up irregular heartbeat called ventricular
fibrillation
and
use “arrhythmia” in that sense[1] and
focus on its association with CVD
and AMI. “While most types of arrhythmia are
not serious, some predispose a person to complications such
as stroke or heart failure.[1][3]
“This myocardial scarring also puts the person at risk for potentially life-threatening abnormal heart rhythms (arrhythmias)…. Injured heart tissue
conducts electrical impulses more slowly than normal heart tissue. The difference
in conduction velocity between
injured and uninjured tissue can trigger re-entry or a feedback loop that is believed to be the cause of many
lethal arrhythmias. The most serious of these arrhythmias is ventricular fibrillation (V-Fib/VF), an extremely fast and chaotic heart rhythm that
is the leading cause of sudden cardiac death,”
Wiki.
Ventricular fibrillation is a medical emergency that requires prompt Advanced Life Support interventions. If this arrhythmia continues for more than a
few seconds, it will likely degenerate further into asystole ("flatline"). This condition
results in cardiogenic shock and cessation of effective blood circulation. As a consequence, sudden cardiac death (SCD) will result in a matter of minutes… death often occurs
if sinus rhythm is not restored within 90 seconds of the
onset of VF, especially if it has degenerated further into asystole” Wiki. Drugs are
ineffective, thus standard treatment consists of discharge of direct current
form a defibrillator, and for high risk patients the use of an implantable
cardioverter defibrillator.
16b) Procedures: I would not submit to
taking a drug for
arrhythmia for three major reasons: they
are not a magic bullet that goes only to the nerves that regulate
the heart beat and restore its
normal pattern of muscular contraction;[2] second
they have numerous side effects made all the more likely as the number of drugs
given increases,; and third their usage
has been strongly associated with cardiac deaths because of drug induced
arrhythmia—this is called proarrhythmia.[3] In the Cardiac
Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CRAST,
1989-1999) two anti-arrhythmia drugs were tested against a placebo[4] to see
if they could prevent “sudden death in patients who were at higher risk because
they had certain kind of abnormal heart rhythm.
The drugs prevented these abnormal rhythms, so everyone thought they must
be great: they were approved onto the
market to prevent sudden death in patients with abnormal rhythms, and doctors
felt pretty good about prescribing them.
When a proper trial measuring death was conducted, everyone felt a bit
embarrassed: the drugs increased the
risk of death to such a huge extent that the trial had to be stopped early….
(it’s been estimated that well over a hundred thousand people had died as a
result).” Bad Pharma, by Prof. Ben
Goldacre, 2013, p. 133-34. After
10 months on the drugs, there were 43
deaths for the drug cohort and just 16 for the placebo group, a nearly 3 fold
increase risk of death, and for non-arrhythmia causes of deaths there were 17
among those receiving the drug and 5 in the placebo cohort, an over 3 fold increase
risk of death. These drugs were standard
treatment for AMI given to patients without
arrhythmia, not just the
select group tested in the CRAST
clinical
trial. These older drugs
have been replaced by a new
generation of drugs that supposedly manage arrhythmia differently and therefor
save lives in industry funded studies.[5] In a much more pharma- friendly world, trials such as the CRAST
(1991,
1989) aren’t run
today. These drugs “are widely
prescribed for patients after they had a heart attack when they had only mild
abnormal heart rhythms…. They actively increased their risks of dying” Goldacre
supra 176-7. Knowing this, I would
refuse all drugs for arrhythmia. Secondly,
pharma has emphasized irregular heart-beat, while the major player AMI is down
played, thus causing the cardiologist to believe that these events often occur spontaneously
in the diseased heart. Wrong: The majority
of
these deaths are due to ventricular fibrillation secondary to myocardial infarction, or "heart attack"[15] Wiki. And knowing that the expansion of the market
is one way that pharma maximizes profits, I would be very, very conservative
about what I would allow in my body.
Similarly I would refuse all physical interventions such as electric cautery
and cardioversion except under the most-dire circumstances. Doing more
does not entail doing good.
17)
Thrombolysis (t-PA):
The
theory of restoring blood flow by administering a drug which dissolves the platelet
blood
portion
of the clot (but does not dissolve plaque) is
attractive, but how effective??? There
are for thrombolysis numerous
contraindicated,[6]
which would eliminate most patients; however in clinical situation
over-treatment is the norm, and the doctor will go forward with t-PA though the
net sums for risks and benefits is negative.
Guidelines extend
the time frame for t-PA beyond the period of modest benefit (90 minutes since first symptoms).[7] As
stated repeatedly, trials results
are seriously flawed by design since they are funded by pharma for marketing purposes
., and doctors cherry pick asand
pharma’s and their KOLs use those of lowest
quality and
--thus
most favorable—to educate cardiologists in CME classes. The cardiologists then repeat what they have learnt
to their patients. The real-world
outcomes for thrombolysis are quite different.
Even with the most prompt thrombolysis (under 1 hour) in ideal patients,
survival increased by 3.5% compared to control patients (Braunwald 5th
ED 1217).[8] That the use of placebo control patients is
permitted by oversight committees is indicative that the benefit from t-PA is
minimal. Thrombolysis causes 5 types of
reperfusion injuries (thus the benefits are much less than reported); “(1) lethal
reperfusion injury—a term referring to reperfusion-induced death of cells that
were still viable at the time of restoration of coronary blood flow. (2) Vascular
reperfusion injury—progressive
damage to the microvasculature such that there is an expanding area of no
reflow and loss of coronary vasodilatory reserve. (3) Stunned myocardium—salvaged
myocytes
display a prolonged period of contractile dysfunction following restoration of
blood flow owing to abnormalities of intracellular biochemistry leading to
reduced energy production. (4)
Reperfusion arrhythmias—burst of ventricular tachycardia and on occasion
ventricular fibrillation that occur within seconds of reperfusion…. (5) The
loss of magnesium with ischemia, followed during reperfusion by sudden exposure
of severely ischemic cells to both calcium and oxygen upon restoration of flow,
has been observed to affect severity of ischemic damage in several animal
species” (Braunwald supra 1213-14). (6)
In real-world situation (versus select ideal patient in a trail with highly
trained physicians) for 29 hospitals in Cleveland, there was a 3 fold increase
of intra-cerebral hemorrhage compared with a matched number who did not receive
t-PA in the 3-hour window from admission (15.7% vs 5.1%) JAMA.
In
one analysis monitoring of performance of what is termed “real world patients”, it was determined that just 1 patient
in 125 was helped, which happens to be the number given such treatment within
the 90 minute window of first symptoms, at. This
hemorrhages caused more than offsets the
3.5% improved survival for those treated in the first 1.5 hours
from symptoms. The risk of
hemorrhage is not just limited to the brain (stroke), but applies to all
tissues. Another study used Danish
patient to measure the number likely
to benefit with alteplase, a t-PA:
“we estimated that 0.4% of unselected stroke patients would benefit from
alteplase treatment—at 1999. Often instead of “survival” pharma uses “benefit”.
The same study found that 4% benefited,
but if a treatment hasn’t the ability to increase survival, than how can
meaningfully improve the quality of life?
“Benefit” is a vague term subject to inflation. These dismal
results for drugs that
effectively breakup clots applies not just to strokes, but aslo to heart
attacks. The reason is that by the time
treatment has begun, the tissue that is not receiving oxygen has already
died. Within about 20 minutes for
tissues that are have a high rate of metabolism most of the cells have died,
including neuron and myocytes (muscle cells).
Thus whatever type of method is used to restore oxygen, the result are
essentially the same. What benefit these
treatments have for peripheral tissue that is being oxygenated by diffusion
from other not affected capillaries, this is offset by the damage of the
invasive procedure (angioplasty) or the inability to form clots due to t-PA. Moreover, thrombolysis opens
the door for long-term treatment with anticoagulants and polypharmacy.
18)
Angiogram, also
called angiography,
arteriography, coronary catheterization, also called and coronary angiogram:
a
widely overused diagnostic tool which
can lead into a PCI (angioplasty #19).
Depending on the type of angiogram, access to the
blood
vessels is gained most commonly through the femoral artery,[9] to look at the left side
of the heart and at the arterial system; or the jugular or femoral vein, to look at the
right side of the heart and at the venous system. Using a system of guide wires and catheters, a type of contrast agent (which shows up by absorbing the x-rays),
is added to the blood to make it visible on the x-ray images. The X-ray images taken may either be still images, displayed on an image intensifier or film, or motion images. The heart images are taken at
15–30 frames per second, not using a subtraction technique, Wiki. (For a longer description at #31). As for the risks: “After an angiogram, a sudden shock can cause
a little pain at the surgery area, but heart attacks and heart strokes usually
don't occur, as they may in bypass
surgery (CABG).
The contrast medium that is used usually produces a sensation of warmth lasting
only a few seconds, but may be felt in a greater degree in the area of
injection. Additionally, damage to blood vessels can occur at the site of
puncture/injection, and anywhere along the vessel during passage of the
catheter.” Wiki. Thus the procedure seems safe, but a
critical review of the literature comes to the opposite conclusion.
Cardiac Catheterization
(heart cath) is the insertion of a catheter into a chamber or vessel of theheart. This is done both
for diagnostic and interventional purposes. Subsets of this technique are
mainly coronary
catheterization,
involving the catheterization of the coronary arteries, and catheterization of cardiac chambers and
valves of the cardiac system. In
2009 there were 600,000 of these procedures.
"Cardiac catheterization" is a general term for a group of
procedures that are performed using this method, such as coronary angiographyand left ventricle
angiography. Once the catheter is in place, it can be used to perform a number
of procedures including angioplasty, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), balloon septostomy, electrophysiology
study or catheter ablation. … Other
common diagnostic procedures include measuring pressures throughout the four
chambers of the heart and evaluating pressure differences across the major
heart valves. Interventional cardiologists can also use cardiac catheterization
to estimate the cardiac output, the amount of blood pumped by the heart per
minute,[1]” Wiki. By the end of this section, the evidence as
to why I would not allow this procedure and its sister the angiogram will allow
you to understand why I would submit to it.
Simply put, angiogram and cardiac catheterization do not lead to beneficial
treatment (with a few rare exceptions, thus why go the risks?
Risks from angiogram
(description of procedure in last section) and
angioplasty:
1) Gateway
to treatments not worth their risks: The subsequent treatments for the
finding of over 50% occlusion. nearly all patients once submitting to an
angiogram now follow their cardiologist’s recommendations. But hHigh
-quality
scientific studies reveal that the prescription of anticoagulants (but for
aspirin), angioplasty (balloon or use
of a stent), CABGbypass
surgery, and the assortment
of drugs increased
likelihood that the patient will tatakesn for high cholesterol and blood,
all these pressure lowering medications are allare, counting side effects and dollar
costs,
on an average worse than nothing at all. Testing for a condition where the
interventions do more harm than good is not in my the
patient’s best interest.[10] Angiogram
opens
the door to the sales pitches by the cardiologist
using pharma’s tobacco science. My father would not have lived 23 years
since
his major heart attack if the current standard guidelines and confirmed treatments were available in 1953
and he followed them. The loss of trust in guidelines is
earned.
2)
Risks
angiogram: (at https://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/003876.htm,
From
the
NIH (National
Institute of Heath) government site
“Cardiac catheterization carries a slightly increased risk
when compared with other heart tests. However, the test is very safe when
performed by an experienced team.”[What follows on the NIH site
proves the opposite!]
Risks of the procedure include the
following:
Cardiac tamponade a medical emergency [accumulation of blood or
fluid inside the membrane sack that surrounds the heart. It can lead to heart
failure, pulmonary
edema, shock, and death, see] Irregular
heartbeats [arrhythmia] Injury
to a heart artery [perforation
of artery is
significant risk at,
less or injuries much more common] Low
blood pressure Allergic
reaction to contrast dye or a medicine administered during the exam Stroke Heart attack [See heading kidney
damage below, for a 15 fold association with MI.[11]]
Considerations associated with any
type of catheterization [thus
also for balloon and PCI]
include the following:
Bleeding, infection, and pain at the IV or catheter site.
[which is an
artery, not vein. “…frequent complications
from arterial
puncture wounds as well as major systemic haemorrhage, at]. Damage the blood vessels or sur”rounding
structures by soft plastic catheters [the wire with surrounding mesh
tube is not soft, thus causes bruising to the single cell layer protective
endothelia cells and
underlying layerballoon expansion and stent]
. Blood
clots could form on the catheters
and later block blood vessels
elsewhere in the body [risk of clinically significant strokes, MI, renal
damage, etc. and of course subclinical events, mini strokes and MIs]. Kidneys damaged by contrast dye (particularly in people with diabetes or
prior kidney problems). [Is symptomatic
in 30% of angiograms.[13] Below this major issue is developed.] [Missed: 1) cholesterol embolism” which causes events
in other areas than stroke (listed above), and which in fact is under 20%
cholesterol; it should be termed “plaque embolism.” 2) coronary- artery spasm which
causes occlusion leading in worse cases to AMI
and death; 3) perforation of coronary artery; 4) restenosis which occurs in over
30% to 50% of angioplasties by month 6; 4) cancer from high exposure to x-rays
during
the 1
hour procedure; 5) “Thrombosis within a stent causing myocardial infarction and
death” at
] Summary angiogram:
a very invasive procedure involving using a system of guide wires and
catheters that to enter the coronary blood vessels and then inject a
contrasting agent. The procedure
depending on finds can take up
to 2 hours and involves
multiple blood vessels for entry. See
description of procedure above at beginning of this section. Given the
assorted risks (all grossly
underestimated) multiplied
by the fact the subsequent treatments based upon finding , my with
rare exceptions are a net
negative, the prudent response is would
be to refuse the
procedure. What
follows are the
evaluations of angioplasty and bypass
surgery. At
the links you may read about the drug
prophylactics
which are good
only for
pharma; see hypertension,
statins,
arrhythmia,
and anticoagulants. It is easiest to say no at the start. 19)
Renal reaction to the iodine contrasting fluid: On Renal damage from the
conservative Medscape site: “Modern intravenous contrast agents are
typically based on iodine. Iodine
contrast
agents are used for the following:
angiography, Venography, …. Iodine-based
contrast media are usually classified as
ionic or non-ionic. Both types are used most commonly in radiology due to their
relatively harmless interaction with the body and its solubility,” Wiki.
On Renal
damage from the conservative Medscape site “Severe symptoms include the following: life-threatening arrhythmiaarrhythmias , (ie, ventricular tachycardia), hypotension, overt bronchospasm, laryngeal
edema, pulmonary edema, seizures, syncope, and death. Moderate symptoms include the following:
persistent vomiting; diffuse urticaria; headache; facial edema; laryngeal edema;
mild bronchospasm or
dyspnea; palpitations, tachycardia, or bradycardia; hypertension; and abdominal cramps…
Nephropathy:
Contrast agent–related nephropathy is an elevation of the serum
creatinine level that is more than 0.5 mg or more than 50% of the baseline level
at 1-3 days after the ICM injection. The elevation
peaks by 3-7 days, and the creatinine
level usually returns to baseline in 10-14 days.[14] The incidence of contrast agent–related
nephropathy in the general population is estimated to be 2-7%. As many as 25%
of patients with this nephropathy have a sustained reduction in renal function;
most commonly when the nephropathy is oliguric.[15] A second article
exposing the assorted risks: “ICM [iodine contrast medium] can cause hypotension and
bradycardia. Vasovagal reactions, a direct negative inotropic effect on the
myocardium, and peripheral vasodilatation probably contribute to these effects.
The latter 2 effects may represent the actions of cardio-active and vasoactive
substances that are released after the anaphylactic reaction to the ICM. This
effect is generally self-limiting, but it can also be an indicator of a more
severe, evolving reaction. ICM can lower
the ventricular arrhythmia threshold and precipitate cardiac arrhythmias and
cardiac arrest. Fluid shifts due to an infusion of hyperosmolar intravascular
fluid can produce an intravascular hypervolemic state, systemic hypertension, and pulmonary edema. Also, ICM can precipitate angina. Other non-idiosyncratic reactions include syncope;
seizures;
and the aggravation of underlying diseases, including pheochromocytomas, sickle cell anemia, hyperthyroidism, and myasthenia gravis. Delayed
reactions: Delayed
reactions become apparent at least 30 minutes after but within 7 days of the
ICM injection. These reactions are identified in as many as
14-30% of patients after the
injection of ionic monomers and in 8-10% of patients after the
injection of nonionic monomers.[25] Common delayed reactions include the development of flulike symptoms, such as the following: fatigue, weakness,
upper respiratory tract congestion, fevers, chills, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea,
abdominal pain, pain in the injected extremity, rash, dizziness, and headache. Conclusion
DARS (delayed adverse reactions to contrast media are not rare
but are often are not recognized as being
linked to contrast administration and
may be falsely ascribed to other drugs. These
side effects are problematic because the patient is usually
without medical supervision” American Journal of Roentgenology,
2014. Another study of the
2,308 patients used N-acetylcysteine to lower
the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy found that “the incidence of contrast
induced acute kidney injury (primary
endpoint) was
12.7%”.[16] The
is is another research based
article that diverges with the KOL-generated
literature found such
as in
Wikipedia, WebMD,
and textbooks, which paint a rosy picture for the sake
of business. The
risks described
are just for the
contrasting agent. This is the pattern of corporate
medicine to hide the issues and sell the fluff.
For a similar situation of risks buried read 2003 for Scientific American on what is referred to by cardiologist
as “pumphead” the normal result following bypass surgery (CABG), at. Reduced
cognitive function “42% at
five years” (NEJM) based
on a decline of 1 standard deviation,[17] 15 IQ points! I doubt that today’s editors of Scientific
American, given their current pharma-friendly editorial policy, would
publish this at
article on pump head, or an article on chemohead from chemotherapy, or on the decline in cognitive functions
from taking psychiatric
drugs. How can the doctors inform
us if these and other side effects are deliberately hidden and/or minimalized
by pharma?
Look at the illustration page firsts
20) Angioplasty (PCI) procedure: in most cases it is a continuation of the
angiogram procedure. Thus all of
the angiogram’s the negative effects listed
apply and
then those for angioplasty (below): “A sheath is a vascular tube placed into the access
artery, such as the femoral artery in the groin that allows
catheter exchanges easily during these complex
procedures. A balloon catheter is a long, thin plastic tube
with a tiny balloon at its tip. A
stent is a small, wire mesh tube. Balloons and
stents come in varying sizes to match the size of the diseased artery”
at. “Angioplasty
is an endovascular procedure to widen narrowed or obstructed arteries or veins, typically to treat
arterial atherosclerosis. An empty,
collapsed balloon, known as a balloon catheter, is passed over a
wire into the narrowed locations and then inflated to a fixed size. The balloon
forces expansion of the stenosis (narrowing) within the vessel and the surrounding muscular wall, opening
up the blood vessel for improved flow, and the balloon is then deflated and
withdrawn. A stent may or may not be inserted at the time of
ballooning to ensure the vessel remains open. Percutaneous coronary
intervention (PCI), commonly known as coronary angioplasty is a therapeutic
procedure to treat the
stenotic (narrowed)the stenotic (narrowed)
coronary arteries of the heart found in coronary heart
disease” Wiki. “It
has been increasingly recognized, since the late
1980s, that coronary catheterization does not allow the recognition of the
presence or absence of coronary atherosclerosis itself
[namely the immature soft plaque that causes under 20% occlusion and 80%
of AMIs], only significant luminal
changes [over 50%] which have occurred as a result of end-stage complications of the atherosclerotic process.
See IVUS
and atheroma for
a better understanding of this issue” Wiki,
2016. This procedure of placing a sent or expanding
the
catheter to open a clogged coronary artery will dislodge debris from the
atheroma that will travel throughout the body to cause ischemic events and thus
tissue destruction. There
are issues with placing
the stent: Stent-dislodge (migration), wrong
location, and loss: Mishaps happen; this includes loss of stent
during incursion process which requires an attempt to retrieve the stent. In
one case of the 38 lost, 35 were retrieved
and 3 were crush by balloon procedure and left there—see. Fortunately this mishap is rare
according to industry; but
sufficient for a patent (6,027,509) to be issued for a retrieval device—at, and
another patented 5913871 device at. Upon looking at the imaging (see example at illustration page), I can only wonder how many
stents and balloon procedures are performed at locations that are not a cause
of the MI or cause of the angina pain. And
it gets worse when we
consider the sum total of negative effects associated with angiogram (prior
summary) and PCI
(developed below).
Benefits: A red flag as to its merit
is the scarcity
of
clinical trials that compare preventative long-term drug treatment to angioplasty with
drugs. The short-term 2004 MASS II found at 12 months the
standard treatment group (203 patients) had an insignificant greater survival
rate than the angioplasty group (98.5 vs 95.6%), a 1.9% difference. Moreover
for PCI with
drugs cohort there were 5
more patients who undergone either an additional PCI or a CABG than the standard medical
treatment cohort. These
results for additional
procedures and death falls well below
the standard for
significance (95% confidence interval) in a trial for 408
patients. This means that the positive result for
medical treatment only has about a 40% of being negative if the trial was ran
again. Since it is an industry funded
trial, where the mischief lies is not known since pharma owns the raw data and
doesn’t share it with the reviewers. The
MASS II trial is supported by other better trials: According
to some clinical trials, bypass surgery and
angioplasty procedures have had at best a minimal effect, if any, on improving
overall survival. Typically mortality of bypass operations is between 1 and 4%,
of angioplasty between 1 and 1.5%, Wiki. The failure of PCI[18]
lies with the fact that it
fails to treat the
actual cause of AMI, young plaque
causing less than 50%
occlusion. Neither of these physical
interventions come close to the benefits of exercise—see next to last journal article reproduced at bottom. The prestigious Cochrane found similar
benefits in their metastudy
comparison.[19] The
side effects and restenosis explains why I would not
undergo a PCI.
21)
Angioplasty as primary treatment for AMI or for preventive therapy for
patients with with
CVD:
Given
the risks associated with thrombolysis, my a use of high dose of aspirin an
angioplasty would appear to be preferred.[20] The artery-opening
procedure alleviates chest pain far more quickly than medical therapy, but has
not been shown to prolong life. The "vast majority of heart attacks do not originate
with obstructions that
narrow arteries" Wiki
2014. However, other
studies show there is no
advantage to having both procedures (Braunwald 1375-76). This statement by Braunwald
means that since
I have taken high dose of aspirin, there is no advantage to undergoing an
angioplasty. The bias of market studiesing
entails that these benefits are overstated.
Adverse events associated with PCI
include those listed for angiogram since the procedure involves an angiogram
followed by adding a shunt. Adverse cardiovascular events associated with
thrombotic occlusion occur in 4% to 12.8% of patients after coronary
angioplasty”, AHA 1997. More
telling is a study of real-world
patients who at one month had major adverse events[21] of 16.5%, 65 of 406 undergoing
stent placement—AHA. Among
the major issues following an angioplasty are cholesterol embolism, dislodging
of stent, restenosis, and the damage to the endothelia cells.
22)
Cholesterol embolism: (often cholesterol
crystal embolism or athero-embolism, sometimes blue toe or purple
toe syndrome or trash foot or warfarin
blue toe syndrome[1]:338) occurs when cholesterol is released, usually from an atherosclerotic plaque, and travels as an embolus in the bloodstream to lodge (as an embolism) causing an obstruction in blood vessels further away. Most commonly this causes
skin symptoms (usually livedo reticularis), gangrene of the extremities and sometimes renal failure; problems with
other organs may arise, depending on the site at which the cholesterol crystals
enter the bloodstream.[2] When the kidneys are involved, the disease is referred to
as athero-embolic renal
disease (AERD).[3] The diagnosis usually involves biopsy (removing a tissue sample) from an
affected organ. Cholesterol embolism is treated by removing the cause and
giving supportive therapy; statin drugs have been found to improve the
prognosis.[2] is the leaking of plaque, and thus the
labeling it as “cholesterol” is deliberately misleading.[22] The
rate is embolism major adverse events at 20%: but their placement carries a 20% incidence of
procedure-related complications, which potentially are related to the distal
embolization of atherosclerotic debris—AHA. And it gets worse
because the plaque can
lodge in the brain resulting in cognitive decline or a stroke, and it can cause
a MI.
23) Restenosis
and increased mortality:
Restenosis occurring in the first six months after angioplasty is caused
largely by smooth muscle cell proliferation and fibrointimal hyperplasia (often
called neointimal proliferation), as well as elastic recoil. It is usually defined
as a greater than 50%
reduction in luminal diameter” at BMJ 2003.[23] “In cardiac
procedures, balloon angioplasty has been associated with a high incidence of
restenosis, with rates ranging from 25% to 50%, and the majority of these
patients need further angioplasty within 6 months[4]” Wiki. In the real
world patient population that
figure is closer to 50%. Moreover, the
risk of dying from PCI procedure in the next 30 days due to PCI was over 50%
higher than those who died from cardiac event not related to PCI.[24] In
other words in the first month, PCI doubles the rate of deaths from cardiac
events. Furthermore those who
get standard medical
treatment (drugs) had lower rate of deaths than those who received drugs and
had a PCI or bypass operation, MASS-II trial, see Capo supra 325. In the supplemental
section is hope’s hypothesis buried, it explains
why doing something doesn’t increase your chance of survival, though it does
lower angina pain.
24) Spasms
causing occlusion, bleeding at sight of angioplasty, and perforation
of coronary artery: These are all
major risks mentioned in some journal articles (for example), for which
clinics are highly motivated to ignore or attribute to natural progression of
coronary artery disease. The
BMJ 2015 points out that of those who suffer in
the US from bleeding event
following a PCI, 12.1%
of them die from it in the
hospital. The list of issues with an oversold invasive
procedure is
long. The true risk
shall never know, and for whom patients
in the clinical setting will not make an informed choice. Only a nerd such as
me has the ability, time,
and inclination to sort it out as best I can from a very biased journal
literature and
medical textbooks
can make a reasonable informed choice. I am not faulting the cardiologist, but rather it is a bad system
which causes the bad results;
one that is very good at marketing. Thus I am not aware
of quality figures
for these types of events, and if there are they are surely under estimated.
25) Atherectomy:
“The advantages of atherectomy when
compared to balloons (angioplasty) and stenting are less vessel barotrauma, no foreign object
(stent metal) left in the body and leaving all future options open for the
patient at the treated site¸ There are four types of atherectomy
devices: orbital, rotational, laser, and directional. The decision to use which
type of device is
made by the interventionist, based on a number of factors. They include the
type of lesion being treated, the physician's experience with each device, and
interpretation of the devices' risks and effectiveness, based on a review of
the medical literature” Wiki. In Cochrane Review, the benefit for
elective rotational atherectomy of coronary artery disease was comparable to
that of angioplasty for major adverse coronary events, but had increased risk
of vascular spasm, perforation, and transient vessel occlusion. Thus like PCI,
it should not be used for prevention. However in theory the procedure should
cause less down-stream MIs (listed as about 20%, see above). A 1998 trial
achieved modest benefits over balloon angiography, AHA, Braunwald hold results similar, though
procedure takes longer. Given the
minimal advantage and the under reported cholesterol embolism (see above), it
is recommended that this procedure like PCI should be limited to the first 2
hours from symptoms.
26) Bypass surgery (CABG):
While not performed during an AMI
for an obvious
reason; the surgery is common: “in 2001 there were over 500,000 bypass surgerieCABGss performed in the US
(making it the most
common major surgery) with the average cost of $61,000 for a total of $32
billion”, Colpo, The Great Cholesterol
Con, 5 Ed 2012 p. 323. The two major trials comparing surgery to
standard treatment came out with reduced angina pain, but no lives saved, and
there is at least a 5% increased chance of dying in the first month from
surgery.[25] And there
is a very real major decline in cognitive
function, which occurs in all CABGS, so common that it merits a
Wikipedia article entitled pumphead—also called postperfusion
syndrome. In 2003 for Scientific American’s article on what is
referred to by cardiologist as “pumphead”
warned of major cognitive
decline the normal result following CABG, at. The main cause is
mini-strokes
caused by micro-embolisms (tiny air bubbles).[26] Reduced cognitive function “42%
at five years” (NEJM)
based on very CABG
friendly decline of 1 standard deviation.[27] And
there is the fact that those undergoing a CABG,
die sooner than those who adopt a
healthful lifestyle,
and those who receive standard drug management (see Colpo supra 324-25). The fundamental reason why angioplasty fails
to extend lives applies to CABG (mature plaque is does not
leak to cause AMIs). Read carefully the
summary below, it explains why invasive treatments do not address the
underlying cause. One
more cautionary note, the
comparison of implant devices is a crap shoot.
Industry published journal articles again and again show that the
regulatory system doesn’t function. Facing
an eminent end of life choice, I would probably opt for a device such as a left ventricular assist
device. If not eminent the evidence
would have to demonstrate very
significant benefit. I
would like my father deal
with major angina pain rather that shorten my life, rather than
experience a very traumatic
operation in which my heart is stopped, a vein is taken from my leg, and my
sternum
is split. The long term results fail to
show in quality studies a significant increase in survival. Exercise
and diet is the best path to health.
27) Hope’s hypotheses
buried: doing a
risky procedure where the sum
total of events is negative is not doing the right thing. In the paper on cancer (#23) I labeled this hope’s hypothesis. This faith that some will be saved
occurs because with a body of data there are some which do much better than the
average (and others that do much worse).
To assume that a person who lives 23 years following a PCI or
CABG would have
died sooner
without that treatment doesn’t stand up unless that treatment has been shown in quality studies to add years to the lives of the entire
population. Quality PCI studies in real
world populations fail to show this benefit.
Fortunately regular aerobic exercise does extend lives—see supplement
below for the journal article. In Part
5, I present a list
of other proven ways to lower the risk of developing CVD and to promote healing.
There
are 2 excellent ways to determine the merits of a treatment: 1) is to run a
clinical trial designed to
rigorously assess long term the benefits and designed to
uncover all risks in a real-world population (not a select ideal population
favoring a positive outcome). The second
way is to open up the General Practice Research Database (GPRD, UK) or similar
databases for analysis, because this will
reveal outcomes in real world patients with various co-morbidities and taking
an assortment of medications. The data
bank will reveal if for example patients on the diabetes drug sulfonylurea who
undergo a PCI are at great risk for MI
following a PCI due to the procedure than the general
population of diabetics on
different medicationsnot taking that drug. We need the governments require wide university access
to the data
banks
opened up. See Ben
Goldacre’s Bad Pharma, p. 156,
227. There are computer programs to
tease out the risks from the data.
Pharma with the support of government regulators has kept the evidence
sealed. If GPRD and other computer
databanks became available for computer analysis, then marketing of drugs would
be greatly diminished. Pharma
spends twice that of
research on marketing. Remove market and
the costs of
drugs would drop. Marketing
is about sales.;
it exaggerates the
benefits and buries the down sides.
The
mantra of pharma is safe and effective. Marketing would
not be cost
effective if physicians knew the merits of treatments and clinical guidelines
were rewritten to uphold the highest scientific standards for patients.
28)
SUMMARY (Invasive therapies bad idea):
Undergoing an angioplasty is not the end
of invasive treatment. Because of
restenosis occurs in about 60% of who undergo insertion of a stent by 3
year6 monthss, and it is the norm for angiograms to
be repeatedly performed, frequency is influenced by angina pain
and other signs of CVD.
And with each new angiogram a significant percentage will undergo
angioplasty or bypass surgeryCABG to fix further
occlusions. Thus the risk of adverse
consequence is multiplied by subsequent procedures. Since the treatment of clogged
coronary arteries
doesn’t treat the cause of over 80% of MIs, the claimed significant risk
reduction for AMIbenefits
can only be based upon junk science.
Allow
me to explain why a logical idea is shot down with ugly facts: As stated before
and strongly supported by
evidence, pharma has
sold the public and doctors on a grossly flawed explanation for CVD and MI—see above causes of
CVD item 3 or the link. Pharma knows that those who undergo these
procedures will very likely take all the (useless) drugs his cardiologist
proscribes, which if
followed and patented run over $70,000 a year--list. Fact one, over 80% of thrombosis caused AMI result from leaking young fresh
plaque. Fact 2, the young plaques in
major coronary arteries causes only about 20% occlusion.[28] Fact 3, an angiogram only reveals an occlusion
greater than 50%. Fact 4, both bypass surgery CABG and angioplasty treat what shows up in
angiogram; thus they are not treating the future cause of AMI, the coronary vessels
with young-immature plaque. To understand the process just below the
endothelial cells of your arteries, think of having a young fresh inflamed boil
that could leak. When the young plaque
leak it could causes an AMI
depending on the amount that leaks and where.
It will block down-stream a narrower coronary artery. It is the amount
of plaque that leaks, where
it lodges, and the degree of subsequent clotting caused by platelets that
determines if you will have a major heart attack. The prophylactic bypass or
stent will not likely
affect the events that follow caused by the leaked young-fresh plaque.[29] A person with advanced CVD will have many occluded coronary vessels and very probably is still
forming young fresh plaque. This is why
the best studies state that within 6 months approximately half experience
restenosis (see #23). The result is the
same with or without the physical intervention:
A prophylactic bypass operation or angioplasty does not treat the cause
of AMI,
the young immature plaque. “While a single ruptured plaque can be identified during
autopsy as the cause of a coronary event, there
is currently no way to identify a culprit lesion before it ruptures” Wiki,
see
image of heart vessels.
This inability to identify
where the event will occur makes
replacing a small section of a coronary artery through bypass surgeryCABG,
or by expansion
through angioplasty, entails that the treatment will not alter the risk of an AMI;
the small benefit is more than
canceled by the increased risks from these procedures. In the
real world patient population (not the carefully selected subset of patients)
the results are worse. It is why most
trials are comparing one invasive treatment to another and not to those who
undergo just drug treatment.
There
is a large industry pushing angiogram, angioplasty, and bypass surgery (CABG).
There are well over one million five hundred thousand procedures
performed in the US annually. Pharma
promotes these procedures because over 90% of those patients will take some or all
the drugs their cardiologist prescribes and their insurance covers. Clinics
promote those procedures because of
the cash cow; for example in 2001 there were over 500,000 bypass surgeries CABGs
performed in the US
(making it the most common major surgery) with the average cost of $61,000 for
a total of $32 billion (Colpo supra 323).
The health insurance companies profit because their rates reflect costs,
and higher cost yield higher net profits.[30]
This
leaves on the table one last benefit from angioplasty and bypass surgery CABG,
namely that for those
with extreme angina pain, it can be a quick fix; however, for about half of
patients it fails to be a fix.[31] There is a better solution: follow
the recommendations below to stop atherogenesis and are willing to allow your
body through revascularization to heal, then o
As
for those experiencing an AMI, by time
of intervention, if more than 90 minutes from first symptoms, after which there
is no benefit to restoration of blood flow, since the damage has already
occurred to the heart muscle. Even for
those who fall within the 90 minute window, the benefit is under 5% increase in
survival. Moreover “On the basis of the NINDS study, thrombolysis could only help, at most,
1 of every 125 stroke patients8” at 1999 . This
number given the similarity of the 2 events (stroke and AMI) also applies to
both thrombolysis and PCI. Thus nearly every patient with AMI is undergoing invasive, risky
procedures which do not increase the rate of survival. Thus
I am advising that for all cases at point
zero, arriving at a clinic with an AMI,
the decision to undergo an angiogram will lead to significantly more harm than
good. Assuming that there is a subgroup
which truly does shows a net benefits, there is no way at point zero for the
patient or doctor to know if you are part of that subgroup; moreover given the
norm of biased by design in clinical trials (average of 32%)
and side effects grossly underestimated, the claimed benefits are merely
a sales pitch. Even if near death, a
significant number of patients survive without angioplasty. I would put my trust
in my body to weather
the storm and submit to only the minor interventions listed rather than relying
on a very misinformed medical profession to perform procedures which on the
average do more harms than good. I think
of my father who survived 2 major and 2 minor heart attacks (1953 through 1960)
and who regained his health; he died from a stroke in 1976. His extreme angina
pain[32]
gradually went diminished until he was pain free by 1964. President Eisenhower
survived 6 heart
attacks. Finally, if you follow my
recommendations for healthful heart,
you will be in the group who does very
significantly better that pharma’s approach for treating CVD. I have at the end of
this paper attached a journal article that confirms the superiority of 20
minutes of daily exercise. Its benefits
include lower risk for AMI,
reduction in angina, and overall feeling much healthier compared to
conventional treatments. At Part
5 is the collection of healthful choices,
ways that have been shown to reduce risks.
Remember that these papers are periodically updated. Also each sections home page has an internal
Google search engine as does each page in the recommended section.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Treatment
decisions today for CVD and MI are predicated
upon tobacco ethics. I strongly
recommend that you watch what university professor’s say about bad pharma. At
http://healthfully.org/rg/id4.html are
posted over 110 links to YouTube lectures and documentaries. With each link
I provide from 2 to 5 lines of
description. The collection of links is
divided into 12 sections. Section 4 is on
cardiovascular disease. There is a list
of worthy books I have read--at.
[1] With an AMI, if the heart is
beating unusually
fast it is probably based upon need, and if slow because of damage to the
myocardium (heart muscle). Both can be
easily remedied if
there is such need. Epinephrine (adrenalin) or an analogy is the
preferred method for increase cardiac output. I would
avoid drugs to slow my
heart; they
relax muscles and cloud the brain.
If it is
prolong and life threatening, there are several electrical ways
to corrects a weak,
fluttering heartbeat,
I would choose them.
[2] Most popular are those which block
neurotransmitters and therefor affect both cognitive functions and mobility by
causing muscles to relax. For more on
these and other drugs used which are widely used to treat hypertension, link.
[3] This side effect is so common that it merited
a Wikipedia article. “Proarrhythmia is a new or more
frequent occurrence of pre-existing arrhythmias, paradoxically precipitated by antiarrhythmic therapy’ Wiki,
[5] This is
the normal pattern of bad pharma in their
drive to expand the market based upon tobacco trials.
[6] Absolute
Contraindications: Previous intracranial
bleeding at any time, stroke in less than 6 months, closed head or facial
trauma within 3 months, suspected aortic dissection, ischemic stroke within 3
months, active bleeding diathesis, uncontrolled high blood pressure (>180
systolic or >100 diastolic), known structural cerebral vascular lesion,
arterio-venous malformations, thrombocytopenia, known coagulation disorders,
aneurysm, brain tumors, pericardial
effusion. Relative contraindications: Current
anticoagulant use, invasive or surgical procedure in the last 2 weeks,
prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) defined as more than 10 minutes,
known bleeding diathesis, pregnancy, hemorrhagic or diabetic retinopathies,
active peptic ulcer, and controlled severe hypertension. The For AMI guidelinesthe re is a
window ofis
4-6 hours from onset
of symptoms.
[7] Studies vary greatly on
death rates, but it
averages about 16%. That is 16 per
hundred who arrive in the hospital die there.
A 5% reduction in deaths for those who are treated with t-PA in the
first 90 minutes entails that the treatment saves less than 1. These numbers
are very close to those for angioplasty.
Thus if
100 patients are treated
with either procedure in the real-world clinical practice, less than 1 life
would be saved. For
one thing only about 1 in
125 is treated in the 90-minute
window. Clinics
use a 6-hour window, not the 90 minute one. . It is very hard to sort
out the
deaths caused by the treatments because
in the industry funded studies they are
attributed to the AMI. Industry
funded studies
favor the industry. Read Prof. Ben Goldacre’s Bad Pharma, the books is about how trials
are ran and written up. Industry is actively protecting
their
investment.
[8] The number eligible for
thrombolysis using the 90 minute from first symptoms entails “On
the basis of the NINDS study, thrombolysis could only help, at most, 1 of every
125 stroke patients8”
at 2000. This number given the similarity of the 2
events probably also applies AMI
for both thrombolysis and PCI. See footnote 37 for a discussion
of the
difference between % save and lived saved.
If 5/100 die without the treatment, and 4/100
treated, there is a 20% increased survival; however, 100 had to be treated to
save 1 life, and the side effects including other causes of death and dollars
are not figured in.
[9] To use a major artery with its
high blood pressure entails a significant risk for major bleeding.
[10]
A number of tests have been shelved because of the negative net results in the
real-world patient population, these include PSA for prostate cancer, X-ray
lung cancer screening are two examples; and critics have questioned the Pap
smear and mammogram.
[11]
Patients who develop CIN after
PCI have a
15-fold higher rate of major adverse cardiac events during hospitalization than
patients without this complication.13 They also have a 6-fold increase in myocardial
infarction and an 11-fold increase in coronary vessel reocclusion.12 At.
[12]
“Infections,
especially of the bloodstream, are common in patients with CVCs; sometimes
these infections are fatal,” Cochrane Review.
[13]
The reason why clinical trials often give a
much lower figure is that they don’t look for the issue by doing the blood work
which shows elevated creatinine, but only include those who have a medical
emergency. Moreover the assorted symptom
are often called idiopathic (cause unknown) assuming that the patient reports
them and their doctor records them.
[14] I found a study in which 30% of those
undergoing a angiogram had subsequent elevated creatinine. Creatinine elevation
is a marker for kidney
damage. I certainly don’t want to stress
my kidneys.
[15] Oliguria is defined as a urine output that is less
than 1 mL/kg/h in
infants, less than 0.5 mL/kg/h in children, and less than 400 mL daily in
adults.
It is one of the clinical hallmarks of renal failure and has
been used as a criterion for diagnosing and staging acute kidney injury,
previously referred to as acute renal failure. At onset, oliguria is frequently acute.
It is often the earliest sign of impaired renal function and poses a diagnostic
and management challenge to the clinician.
[16]
This figure of 12.7% and all that has been uncovered above demonstrates
the bias of pharma’s KOLsS in Wikipedia: “If the patient is allergic to the contrast
medium, much more serious side effects are inevitable; however, with new
contrast agents the risk of a severe reaction are less than one in 80,000 examinations”
Wiki. What
counts as severe reaction???
[17] “Decline in postoperative function was defined as
a
drop of 1 SD or more in the scores on tests of any one of four domains of
cognitive function.” This would entail, e.g.
going from 100 IQ to 85 IQ, only 15.8% of the
population would score lower—see Wiki.
[18]
Similar results were for the CABG cohort of the trial. Both groups had very
significant reduction in
angina compared to the MT group 88%, 79%, and 46% were angina free at 1
year. These results have been known for
decades, that these procedures reduce short-term angina superior to that of
just drugs.
[19]
The findings
of this update are consistent with the previous (2011) version of this Cochrane
review and show important benefits of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation
that include a reduction in the risk of death due to a cardiovascular cause and
hospital admission and improvements in health-related quality of life, compared
with not undertaking exercise.
[20] As stated above typical
angioplasty (PCI) involves the use of an anticoagulant. Given that heparin is
inferior to aspirin
(see above), aspirin should be requested over heparin or other adjunction to
PCI treatment.
[21] Major events (primary
endpoints) are all deaths, MI, emergency bypass, and revascularization by 30
days—AHA.
[22] Plaque described: “An atheroma is
an accumulation
of degenerative material in the tunica intima (inner
layer) of artery walls.
The material
consists of (mostly)macrophage cells,[1][2] or
debris,
containing lipids (cholesterol and
fatty acids),
calcium and a variable amount of fibrous connective tissue. The accumulated material forms a swelling in
the artery wall, which may intrude into the channel of the artery, narrowing it
and restricting
blood flow” Wiki.
[23]
This article reads like a sales pitch for PCI with everything new diminishing
older issues. The lack of spine in
medical journals as to review and correction of industry spin is a main theme
of Prof. Ben Goldacre’s book Bad Pharma—highly
recommended.
[24]
In the study 17% of deaths among the 4078 consecutive patient who underwent
elective or emergency PCI, 17% of death were attribute to cardiac deaths not
related to PCI and 38% were related to PCI. at
AHA 2012.
[25]
Again I must remind you that industry and government funded studies favor
industry. The best study found average
bias at 32%.
[26] One problem “in addition
to
bubbles, clotted shards of blood cells, particles of corroded tubing and
arterial plaque—all collectively called emboli—can make their way through the
pump and canulae and back into the body… and they can block blood flow in a
manner akin to a mini stroke, starving or even killing nearby tissue.” (p.
80-81). “Micro-emboli—one
tenth the size of the detectable ones
and numbering 200 to 300 an hour—may still escape discovery and potentially
damage body or brain tissue. Newman and others believe that these types of anomalies
during surgery, could cause cognitive problems in patients” at. “CPB [CABG]
may contribute
to immediate
cognitive decline. The heart-lung blood circulation system and the connection
surgery itself release a variety of debris into the bloodstream, including bits
of blood cells, tubing, and plaque. For example, when surgeons clamp and
connect the aorta to tubing, resulting emboli may block blood flow and cause
mini strokes. Other heart surgery factors related to mental damage may be
events of hypoxia, high or low body temperature, abnormal blood pressure,
irregular heart rhythms, and fever after surgery Wiki.
[27] “Decline in
postoperative function was defined as a drop of 1 SD or more in the scores on
tests of any one of four domains of cognitive function.” This would entail,
e.g. going from 100 IQ to 85 IQ, only 15.8% of the population would score lower—see
Wiki.
[28]
“lder plaque is stable and unlikely to cause a
medical emergency, though, for example, it can cause stable angina. Most
MIs occur with less than 50% and typically
at locations with about 20% stenosis
(narrowing), prior to sudden lumen closure resulting in an MI”Wiki—Note,
this quote has been removed. Most
medical articles in Wikipedia have been
edited by pharma’s KOLs to create consistency with what is taught
physicians. I have found numerous
changes in the last 3 years.
[29]
“According to some
clinical trials, bypass surgery and angioplasty procedures have had at best a
minimal effect, if any, on improving overall survival” wiki.
[30]
All me to explain, assume health insurance companies average 15% profits, and
suppose the average family of 4 pays $2,000 directly or indirectly (as through
taxes) for coverage. Making 15% of
$2,000 is more than making 15% of $1,500.
Competing with other companies, they save costs by beating down payments
to clinics, drug companies, doctors, etc.; and by increasing co-pays, pocketing
the spread being Medicare payment and cost of drug, they fatten their
profits.
[31] Though not relevant to discussion of those
with angina pain, those without pain run about 15% of developing angina from
the procedure for some will undergo spasm and/or blockage from a cholesterol
embolism
[32]
A month after release from the hospital, It took him a month al 15 minutes to
walk one block; the same after the 2nd 2 years later.
|